Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

That Guy · 11-15-2006, 04:10 AM

from the first games, it looks like it'll be betts 75% of the time at least, but maybe the coaches finally realized TJ can play... if that's the case who knows?

the other problem (besides whether TJ steals carries), is how good or bad campbell's going to be, since that'll directly effect how the offense is called.

If you don't need jamal, it'd be a good move, just in case it works out since betts numbers would be more consistent in the best case senario. if you need that rb in you lineup (no other decent depth), you could end up screwing yourself...

so, who are your other RBs and how many RB/flex spots do you have?

11-15-2006, 04:10 AM	#2
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,574	Re: ladell for jamal? from the first games, it looks like it'll be betts 75% of the time at least, but maybe the coaches finally realized TJ can play... if that's the case who knows? the other problem (besides whether TJ steals carries), is how good or bad campbell's going to be, since that'll directly effect how the offense is called. If you don't need jamal, it'd be a good move, just in case it works out since betts numbers would be more consistent in the best case senario. if you need that rb in you lineup (no other decent depth), you could end up screwing yourself... so, who are your other RBs and how many RB/flex spots do you have?