Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

offiss · 11-01-2006, 12:13 AM

The only way to truly settle that debate is for the 2 to change teams, sometimes schemes have as much to do with a players success as talent itself, I alway's felt Marino would have at least 4 or 5 rings if he played for us in the 80's, Many QB's have had great success in the 9er's offense. I personally believe there is a lesser desparity between Brady and Manning as far as offense goes, both play in offenses that throw downfield, not a dink and dunk style O, Manning does have the benefit of playing in a dome most of the time, I also feel he has better talent around him, the equalizer is Brady has better coaching around him.

Bottom line it has to be Brady, I believe he's better than Montana. Peyton may get there but he has a long way to go to be considered as good as Brady.

11-01-2006, 12:13 AM	#24
offiss Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ] Age: 60 Posts: 3,097	Re: Brady or Manning? The only way to truly settle that debate is for the 2 to change teams, sometimes schemes have as much to do with a players success as talent itself, I alway's felt Marino would have at least 4 or 5 rings if he played for us in the 80's, Many QB's have had great success in the 9er's offense. I personally believe there is a lesser desparity between Brady and Manning as far as offense goes, both play in offenses that throw downfield, not a dink and dunk style O, Manning does have the benefit of playing in a dome most of the time, I also feel he has better talent around him, the equalizer is Brady has better coaching around him. Bottom line it has to be Brady, I believe he's better than Montana. Peyton may get there but he has a long way to go to be considered as good as Brady.