Thread: Monk vs Reed
View Single Post
Old 10-03-2006, 06:56 PM   #12
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 54
Posts: 3,048
Re: Monk vs Reed

This is the problem they will face with not allowing Monk in. He had very strong numbers so Reed poses a dilemna. They want to put Reed in, because the media LOVED that Bills team, but if they do, they have to answer for Monk and they don't have one. Witness P.K. trying to explain his vote. He can't because the real reason he won't vote for Monk is that he has always despised the Washington Redskins. Period. It's insane and it's an insult. Every other dynasty team gets their props except us. The Packers, the Raiders, the Steelers, the 49ers, soon the Cowboys, and the Vikings, My God, the Vikings. Apparently we won all of our Super Bowls on the strength of Coach Gibbs and John Riggins which is amazing since Riggins didn't play in the last two. Good for you, John!

The reality is that the Bills were a very good team in a lousy conference and some folks just never got the memo. (But they went to four straight Super Bowls. You can't forget that, blah, blah, blah). Exactly. The AFC was that bad. They had to send somebody.

I predict they will put Reed in before Monk and we'll hear how his impact was different than Monk's. (I just think that Reed really embodied the spirit of that team, yada, yada, yada). And they'll harp on the 19 TDs till they're blue in the face. Whatever they can think of to avoid telling the truth. And if you think I'm paranoid, check out the SportsCenter thread. More proof! I believe they have sent Tafkas to watch us. (Just kidding) (Maybe)
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.50005 seconds with 10 queries