View Single Post
Old 09-18-2006, 12:49 PM   #44
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 2,631
Re: Al Saunders: was he necessary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Well we can't underestimate Clinton Portis anymore, for those that have. For one thing, you know he would have laid out a few people with some blocks to give Brunell that extra second. Betts and Duckett don't compare to Portis as runners or as blockers.
absolutely dead on.

Ladell and T.J. (all 254 lbs of him) were directly responsible for two sacks, did you see that? i bet Mark feels alot safer passing with Clinton back there.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 0.58091 seconds with 10 queries