View Single Post
Old 09-18-2006, 09:06 AM   #14
onlydarksets
Playmaker
 
onlydarksets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
Re: Al Saunders: was he necessary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redrock-skins View Post
Weren't most of those 1st and 2nd down passes late in the game? Not to mention that some of those "passes" were the short dump off variety.
Lets put this to rest. Here is the breakdown by quarter:

Code:

      FIRST       SECOND       
   Pass   Run   Pass   Run       
Q1   3     1      2     2       
Q2   1     3      2     2       
Q3   1     4      0     1       
Q4   7     1      5     0

Obviously, we ran on 1st/2nd downs a LOT more in the first three quarters. We gave up the run in the fourth when we had no choice.

If the announcers are to be believed, I blame this one on Gibbs. They quoted him as saying that we were going to run the ball a LOT more tonight because he thought 17 touches was not enough (FWIW, I agree). However, that suggests he took some control back from Saunders. How the hell are the players supposed to learn the system if Saunders isn't allowed to run it?
__________________
Stop reading my signature.

Last edited by onlydarksets; 09-18-2006 at 09:08 AM. Reason: Formatting got hosed
onlydarksets is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
 
Page generated in 1.28980 seconds with 10 queries