Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NFLeurope
I dont know why you guys think lavar is gone in the offseason... I mean if we were in a dire cap situation like the titans this year i could understand. But with the normal restructuring/cutting of loose ends it looks like we'll be ok in terms of getting under the cap. And in addition, it would cost more to cut/trade lavar than to keep him.
Plus, lavar hasnt been entirely healthy this year. I truly believe that with a full healthy offseason he would be back to his old self next season, and with him marcus washington and lemar marshall...i reallly think we would have one of the best linebacking corps in the league.
Then if the year after someone wants to get rid of him...once he has top market value, and a lesser cap hit for the skins...well that might be a business decision (though i hope he remains a skin for the remainder of his career). But why trade him now??? The timing just doesnt seem favorable at all...huge cap hit+not top trade value cause he hasnt been healthy. I say keep him...but thats just me i guess.
|
I agree with you that it's a bad time to get rid of him because we'll have to eat a cap hit in the realm of $12 million. And I agree that he doesn't come with top trade value right now. The problem is that he clearly doesn't want to be here. Maybe something will change and he and Gregg Williams can work things out, but right now Williams doesn't seem to like Lavar too much.
I tend to trust Gregg Williams, if he thinks Lavar doesn't follow the script enough, then we're better off without him. Might as well get something for him if Gregg Williams thinks he'll be of little use to the Redskins.
The thing is, Arrington is due a $6 million roster bonus in the offseason. The only way the Skins would pay him that money is if he restructures his deal, which would mean we'd be committing ourselves for another few years in terms of the salary cap. I don't see Gregg Williams making that committment to Lavar.
Lavar is supposed to count $12 million against our cap next year if he's on the team. If we cut him post June 1, he'll count $5 million in 2006 and $7 million in 2007. So that would save us $7 million in 2006, but we'd carry $7 million in dead money in 2007.
If we cut/traded him before June 1, he'll count $12 million in 2006 as dead money. So in that scenario he'd count $12 million whether here or gone.
Cutting/trading him post-June 1 seems most likely. I can't see Gregg Williams making the committment.