Quote:
|
Originally Posted by railcon56@comcast.net
Well the media is trying to make more of this i just saw lavar on tv saying it was alot of his own opinions... and he i worried about philly now..... but bauer i wont fight with you i have been very entertained by your posts on the eagles board ... you have my respect...... and i am clouded alot by the fact that Lavar maybe my all time favorite football player....
|
yeah, its all fine we all have our opinions.
Now after further thinking
I just don't think lavar did anything wrong. He is saying he might not be here next year. The thing is everyone from the guys at ESPN to your average joe has thought this. I think it is impossible due to the cap hit we will take. According to
http://redskins.scout.com/3/2006_Salary_Cap.html the skins hit from my man lavar is about 500,000 more than if we kept him. No way will we pay to take him away. Our very own CrazyCunuck does a great job and his cap also shows a difference in about 700,000.
Now if the writer of the times is right that means we save 6.5 million by cutting him and if that is true lavar should be scared of because he WILL be gone. BUt if everyone else is right lavar in my opinion will be lighting people up for years to come as a redskin.
I am not mad at lavar but it does seem that there is something wrong with big boy dan. Everyone leaves on such bad terms. Smoot and pierce shouldn't be upset but like lavar said it happened to davis, coles and bailey. All fan favorites, all taken down by dan. Lavar didn't have to bad talk the organization this week but the thing is if he did this 5weeks ago i would call him crazy or 4 weeks ago or 3 or 2 or last week or next week. If he wants to get this off his chest this was the best week to do it but the quote that hurt me was.
"Causing a fumble to win a game or getting an interception to change a season, that's not the extent of my life," he says. "It never has been. I always see myself as a person first. Maybe coaches get upset that I don't take myself or this game too seriously and they do. Maybe they get upset because I see it as a game and nothing more than a game."
Lavar was Lavar because he fought hard and if he is saying that he doesn't take the game as seriously as the coaches do then i feel like i was wrong about him. I think this is not what he meant but he did say it.