Quote:
Originally Posted by nonniey
Don't know where you are getting that from? Takes quite a bit of reading into the testimony, and the anonymous source that said the Secret Service disputes what she said, to say she has been debunked. First of all, none of her first hand accounts have been debunked (which were legally the most damaging) and her 3rd hand accounts (most embarrassing to Trump) have only been disputed (again I want to highlight that the latter claim of a dispute came from an anonymous source). Given that it has been 18 months since she heard the story told to her (2d hand although in front of the actual witness), I wouldn't doubt some of the details she reported on were wrong about what happened in the beast. That doesn't mean she is lying. I imagine if and when the actual witness testifies there will be discrepancies from what was relayed to her and then by her to Congress, but I'd put money on it that his testimony will still be pretty damning toward Trump.
|
The obsession continues…lol. This is show, smear, political hit job, illegitimate, etc. And by all means bring charges…if they don’t, this mean zero.
her credibility was crushed by the NBC news report and if they don’t immediately bring the 2 secret services officers in to testify, then again, it’s a joke.