Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10
LOL
She doesn't need to define 'woman' she just needs to apply the law of the land as written. She's not being nominated as a psychological expert on gender identity, she's being nominated as a Supreme Court Justice.
It was a stupid question that smart people see right through. That's why she answered it that way.
|
Definitely an interesting answer. Of course this is the first time a politician has attempted to score political points with its base at a nomination hearing.
But I agree, it’s about the law of the land as written. Interesting Biden chose his nomination based on identity…his words, not mine. I think she’ll do fine