Why?
Why do we need 16 year olds with assault rifles "protecting people".
If something starts to happen .. I dont trust a 16 or 17 year old to be able to maintain their composure.
A frazzled 16 year old armed with an assault rifle is going to perceive a lot of things as a threat when an adult might be more rationale.
The first guy Rittenhouse killed was unarmed but acting like a "babbling idiot" asking to be shot.
The adults could see he wasnt a real threat ... Rittenhouse was scared. Scared kids tend to do dumb things.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/wisconsin...use-protesters
-------------------
Lackowski, who was armed the night of the unrest, said he had traveled to Kenosha to protect local property. He said he met Rittenhouse, who introduced himself as an EMT.
The former Marine testified that he also came across Rosenbaum, who "had been...acting very belligerently, he had asked very bluntly to shoot him" but that he did not consider the man to be a threat.
Lackowski said he perceived Rosenbaum as a "babbling idiot" and that he turned away and ignored him. He said Rosenbaum was "false stepping ... to entice someone to do something" -- an action he demonstrated for the jury as taking a quick step forward before stepping back.
At one point, Lackowski testified, he ran toward the sound of gunfire and encountered Rittenhouse -- who appeared "frazzled, in shock" and was still armed -- running away.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/05/us/ky...day/index.html
---------------------
I dont want your fucking 16 year old daughter walking around volatile areas with an assault rifle ffs.
I dont trust your 16 year old daughter with my life.
I shouldnt have to trust the judgment of an armed 16 year old.
-------------
Rittenhouse .. all those adults with guns and its not by coincidence the 17 year old perceived a threat when the adults didnt.
17 year old was the only one to fire his weapon (except some random gun fire that spooked Kyle to begin with).