Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse
But that's the point, the ball is NOT dead, as he's still an active runner. If the ball had touched the ground while in his possession before he went into the end zone or his knee etc. had touched down beforehand then yes it would be a downed ball. But he caught it in mid air and ran straight into the EZ. There have been other examples in the past where a runners momentum carried him into the EZ and it was ruled a TB. Arguably the ref should have assessed it wasn't his momentum that carried him into the EZ, but you are asking the official to make a judgement call on whether a player deliberately ran over the goal line or not, and they are going to err on the side of caution.
NB I thought it hit his hand warmer on the replay but I only saw it from the one angle where it moved as the ball gets near him. That could easily be simultaneous movement and an optical illusion. I was a bit narked that we didn't get any other angles (at least I don't recall any) to confirm that. And the studio didn't seem keen on looking at it more closely so I can only assume it wasn't challenged because someone had an angle that confirmed it didn't hit.
|
Yes it is. You're not allowed to run back a punt as a member of the kicking team, the ball is dead when you catch it,
he was absolutely NOT an active runner.
"The game clock operator shall stop the game clock (timeout) upon a signal by any official or upon the operator’s own positive knowledge:
b) when the kicking team recovers a scrimmage kick beyond the line of scrimmage;"
And then:
"When the kickers catch or recover a kick beyond the line of scrimmage,
the ball is dead at the spot of recovery, even if a member of the receiving team has first touched the ball."
This is why I say the
rule is badly written: on one hand the
ball is dead when caught by a
player of the kicking team... but on the other hand if he
crosses the goal line it's a touchback.
Again, I think this rule was written for bang bang few centimeters of the goal line situations. I see how if you read it litteraly it could apply here, but I don't think it's the spirit of this rule.