Quote:
Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins
I guess I am questioning whether the courts would be any better?
|
I believe that IF the House made a case that there was an urgency around the elections then the Courts would have acted with expedience. The House implicitly argues that it was not worth their time to even try to find out, and that to me is wrong.
In other words, I believe the courts would find, with reasonable evidence, that protection of our election process was worthy of expediting. Heck they expedited the NFL NFLPA lawsuits in 2010 over the CBA because of a football season.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk