Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

Chico23231 · 10-02-2018, 03:18 PM

1. https://money.cnn.com/2018/10/02/med...eet/index.html

"New York Times says it was a mistake to enlist writer who posted anti-Kavanaugh tweet to report on him"

2. https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/med...ex.html?iid=EL

New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley

The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701."

But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase.

The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question

Its really ashame and a sham people continue to believe the New York Times is unbiased. Folks the proof is in the pudding...couple more stories of NYT biased and walking back shit

10-02-2018, 03:18 PM	#708
Chico23231 Warpath Hall of Fame Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 34,817	Re: Media Bias 1. https://money.cnn.com/2018/10/02/med...eet/index.html "New York Times says it was a mistake to enlist writer who posted anti-Kavanaugh tweet to report on him" 2. https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/14/med...ex.html?iid=EL New York Times amends report that improperly pinned pricey curtains on Nikki Haley The initial story written by reporter Gardiner Harris carried the headline, "Nikki Haley's View of New York Is Priceless. Her Curtains? $52,701." But the original story included a comment from a spokesperson for Haley who said plans to purchase the curtains were made during the end of the Obama administration and that Haley had no say in the purchase. The story drew significant backlash on social media, prompting editors to review it. Following review, The Times concluded that the story had "created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question Its really ashame and a sham people continue to believe the New York Times is unbiased. Folks the proof is in the pudding...couple more stories of NYT biased and walking back shit