Commanders Post at The Warpath - View Single Post

firstdown · 10-28-2005, 10:02 AM

Moss last year just average, Brunell last year just terrible. It's a toss up. Ramsey might, and thats a big might have the stuff to carry the team but I think we would lose those close games Brunell is winning. If Moss went down our other WR's might be able to carry the load but we lose the some close games that Moss would have won for us. Our offense is much better this year so if either went down it would be much easier to replace one of them. Someone made the comment that the Eagles could survive without TO but with as much as they are throwing the ball they maybe dead in the water without him.

10-28-2005, 10:02 AM	#25
firstdown Living Legend Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: chesapeake, va Age: 61 Posts: 15,817	Re: Who is more important, Brunell or Moss? Moss last year just average, Brunell last year just terrible. It's a toss up. Ramsey might, and thats a big might have the stuff to carry the team but I think we would lose those close games Brunell is winning. If Moss went down our other WR's might be able to carry the load but we lose the some close games that Moss would have won for us. Our offense is much better this year so if either went down it would be much easier to replace one of them. Someone made the comment that the Eagles could survive without TO but with as much as they are throwing the ball they maybe dead in the water without him.