|
Re: Media Bias
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231
Well written piece supported by facts of a non political source.
Best part of article:
Many beltway journalists are essentially establishment creatures, gatekeepers for the political ruling class, members of that class and fierce guardians of their place in the empire. The political class sees Trump and the 62 million Americans who voted for him as the stuff they scrape off their shoes.
While Trump's 80-20 negative coverage ratio is amazing, Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush also received much negative coverage in their first 100 days, at about 60-40 ratios.
So how was President Obama covered in his first 100 days? With a 60-40 positive to negative ratio, according to the Harvard study.
"That's a significant shift, a significant difference," says Bevan. "I think this is reflective of the fact that the media does root from the press box and they do cheer for certain personalities and they do cheer against others."
|
How do they explain that even the "press that supports trump" reports a 52% negative news about him?Harvard has been wrong before.The Tangerine turd brings it on himself.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
|