Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
This is enough for me. Even a little is worth it. It always comes down to, "Well, it probably won't work so let's just not try it." I mean, why not? That's my question, why NOT try?
And trust me, I don't think guns are the sole problem nor do I think all guns should be banned. Obviously, this is pure speculation, but say we had an assault gun ban in effect, do you think the death toll would have been as high? I really don't think it would have been. I think your serious terrorist would do whatever they could to acquire bomb building materials, assault rifles, etc.
Again, if it lowered these types of crimes by .0000001% that's worth it because really, what is the cost?
|
I think we need to separate a couple things...these assault weapons tend to be used in these activity shooter, mass killing.
"normal" gun violence tends to be hand guns and long guns.
The mass killings are headline makers...normal gun violence isn't talked about much.
We talk about mass killings a lot...we don't talk about everyday gun violence which affect more folks across the country. Chicago, Baltimore...? Are we good with this? Would assault weapons bans stop this violence? probably very little.
The mass killings are usually mentally unstable, mental illness...some terrorists. I think these people would still want to kill regardless of a ban of assault weapons. Is it the act or gun?
These are tough questions for sure