![]() |
Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
Sporting News August 5 issue...
NFC: [B]Vikings[/B] - A [B]Eagles[/B] - Donovan McNabb is the NFC's East best. Koy Detmer and Mike McMahon are solid. Grade: A [B]Falcons[/B] - A- [B]Packers[/B] - B+ [B]Rams[/B] - B+ [B]Panthers[/B] - B [B]Seahawks[/B] - B [B]Saints[/B] - C+ [B]Bears[/B] - C [B]Giants[/B] - Eli Manning must ace his sophomore year. The backups have thin resumes. Grade: C [B]Buccaneers[/B] - C [B]Cardinals[/B] - C- [B]Dallas[/B] - Both veteran Drew Bledsoe and youngster Drew Henson have alot to prove. Grade: C- [B]Lions[/B] - C- [B]49ers[/B] - C- [B]Redskins[/B] - Patrick Ramsey needs to avoid turnovers. Rookie Jason Campbell has potential. Grade: C- AFC: [B]Colts[/B] - A [B]Patroits[/B] - A [B]Chargers[/B] - A- [B]Titans[/B] - A- [B]Chiefs[/B] - B+ [B]Steelers[/B] - B+ [B]Bengals[/B] - B [B]Texans[/B] - B [B]Jaguars[/B] - B [B]Jets[/B] - B [B]Raiders[/B] - B [B]Broncos[/B] - B- [B]Bills[/B] - C+ [B]Browns[/B] - C+ [B]Ravens[/B] - C [B]Dolphins[/B] - C- |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
bills browns ravens and dolphins are too high ;) I think we should be above the bears in the nfc rankings instead of in the gutter behind untested rookies and teams with unsettled (becausse of bad play) QB positions.
|
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
well i guess that we have trust this, they did a hell of a job on Running back
|
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
Nobody below a C-? Commoooon' they need to be tougher on some.
|
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
Our starter has a career QB rating of 82-point-something, and had more TDs than INTs over his career. Our backup (though he had a bad year last year) is among the top tem EVER rating-wise. Like many other teams, we have a rookie in the mix.
How does that make us tied for last? |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
[QUOTE=BrudLee]Our starter has a career QB rating of 82-point-something[/QUOTE]
Did we sign a new QB? Ramsey hasn't got even close to 80 in his 3 years. |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
[QUOTE=davy]Did we sign a new QB?
Ramsey hasn't got even close to 80 in his 3 years.[/QUOTE] I stand corrected - he has a career rating of 74.4. That was an absolute brain-fart. On the other hand, that puts him higher than the following: Joey Harrington (67.2) David Carr (72.5) Kyle Boller (68.1) Drew Henson (61.8) And it out him within striking distance of Carson Palmer, Mike Vick, and a host of other "stars". I know there's more to the position than rating, but a little credit... |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
David Carr is going to be a pretty good one...
|
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
[QUOTE=BrudLee]I stand corrected - he has a career rating of 74.4. That was an absolute brain-fart.
On the other hand, that puts him higher than the following: Joey Harrington (67.2) David Carr (72.5) Kyle Boller (68.1) Drew Henson (61.8) And it out him within striking distance of Carson Palmer, Mike Vick, and a host of other "stars". I know there's more to the position than rating, but a little credit...[/QUOTE] I"ve always thouight that Ramsey has been one of the best QB's drafted since he came out. Sure other guys might have more natural skills, but considering ALL THE CRAP he has gone through . . . his #'s are not too far behind many people. |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
Bottom of the Barrell??? I got a Unit they can analyze.
'Course, they'd probably go below a c- for that one lol |
Re: Unit Analysis: Quarterbacks
G-G-G-G-G-G-G-Unit?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.