Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

Might be a good topic for a poll. Anyway this is about who you would bet on being the teams next QB not who you want to be the teams next QB.

[B]Free Agents [/B]- Manning, Flynn

[B]Trades -[/B] Bradford, Sanchez, Hoyer

[B]Rookies -[/B] RGIII, Luck, Tannehill, Foles, Moore, Etc

[B]Suicide -[/B] Grossman, Beck, Crompton

For the record my pick was Tannehill.

Also if possible could the title be changed to "Your Pick For The Redskins Next QB"

Re: Your Pick For The Redskins Next QB
 

[quote=Dirtbag59;878598]Might be a good topic for a poll. Anyway this is about who you would bet on being the teams next QB not who you want to be the teams next QB.

[B]Free Agents [/B]- Manning, Flynn

[B]Trades -[/B] Bradford, Sanchez, Hoyer

[B]Rookies -[/B] RGIII, Luck, Tannehill, Foles, Moore, Etc

[B]Suicide -[/B] Grossman, Beck, Crompton

For the record my pick was Tannehill.

Also if possible could the title be changed to "Your Pick For The Redskins Next QB"[/quote]

Seeing as how my current desktop picture is Robert Griffin III in a Redskins uniform #11 that I took from The Bleacher Report I am going with:


Robert Griffin III

[B](Dirtbag or SmootSmack I'm going to need you to find and post that pic.)[/B]

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

Dream scenario: Luck

Most likely to happen: Weeden

Why? Shanahan won't like Tannehill as much as Weeden, and can get Weeden in the 2nd, where as Tannehill would be a mid-late first. He knows he can't get Luck. He wanted RG3, but realized that Cleveland has 2 first rounders, and if St. Louis or Minnesota trades with Cleveland, either of those teams gets one of their major needs, Kalil a LT or Blackmon the WR; where as if they traded with the Redskins, they don't end up with a great player.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

[quote=CultBrennan59;878606]Dream scenario: Luck

Most likely to happen: Weeden

Why? Shanahan won't like Tannehill as much as Weeden, and can get Weeden in the 2nd, where as Tannehill would be a mid-late first. He knows he can't get Luck. He wanted RG3, but realized that Cleveland has 2 first rounders, and if St. Louis or Minnesota trades with Cleveland, either of those teams gets one of their major needs, Kalil a LT or Blackmon the WR; where as if they traded with the Redskins, they don't end up with a great player.[/quote]

Yep, cause we all know you NEVER EVER get a great player at pick #6.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

I'd prefer Sanchez, Bradford or Flynn. In that order.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

I want the Browns to sign Flynn.
RGIII falls to us.

The crowd goes wild!

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

Bradford 1st & 3rd & next yrs 2nd.
RG3 1st & 2nd & next yrs 1st & 3rd & we get ST. Louis's 4th next year.
Chad Henne he's a FA.

You need to say how your going to get these QB's.

Something tells me we end up with LUCK. SHOCK the World.

I want Bradford.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

I think we pay the price and land Andrew Luck.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

People have quickly forgotten that this thread is about WHAT WILL HAPPEN, not WHO YOU WANT.

My answer: Ryan "Steve Young" Tannehill.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

[quote=Schneed10;878628]I think we pay the price and land Andrew Luck.[/quote]

Indy isn't going to give that pick up. It's not happening. I think getting RG3 is a long shot at this point. If we can't trade for Bradford I think we will take BPA at #6 or trade down again like last year and go QB in the 2nd round or late 1st.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

[quote=SkinzWin;878633]Indy isn't going to give that pick up. It's not happening. I think getting RG3 is a long shot at this point. If we can't trade for Bradford I think we will take BPA at #6 or trade down again like last year and go QB in the 2nd round or late 1st.[/quote]

That didn't answer the question.

Re: Your Pick For The Redskins Next QB
 

[quote=Dirtbag59;878598]Might be a good topic for a poll. Anyway this is about who you would bet on being the teams next QB not who you want to be the teams next QB.

[B]Free Agents [/B]- Manning, Flynn

[B]Trades -[/B] Bradford, Sanchez, Hoyer

[B]Rookies -[/B] RGIII, Luck, Tannehill, Foles, Moore, Etc

[B]Suicide -[/B] Grossman, Beck, Crompton

For the record my pick was Tannehill.

Also if possible could the title be changed to "Your Pick For The Redskins Next QB"[/quote]

If we trade for Sanchez, nobody will need to be near me within a 5 mile radius.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;878634]That didn't answer the question.[/quote]

What was the question I did not answer? Are you referring to where I said trade down and get a QB in the late 1st or 2nd, but didn't list anyone specifically?

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

I said Griffin, just because I'm thinking more and more that the Browns would rather trade down to pick up more picks and build a team around Colt McCoy.

re: Predict Who Will Be The Next Redskins QB (Not Necessarily the QB You Want)
 

[quote=skinsguy;878648]I said Griffin, just because I'm thinking more and more that the Browns would rather trade down to pick up more picks and build a team around Colt McCoy.[/quote]

I want to agree with you as I know that is Holmgren's inclination, but I just just can't help but feel like with all of these extra picks he has he won't go for the big fish this time. If you play the percentage game about us getting RG3 vs not, I can't help but feel we are on the bad side. There are so many situations working against us. If we just hadn't beat the Giants none of this would be an issue...