still #1 in defence!
 

2004 Regular Season NFL · AFC · NFC Team Sortables - DefensePassingRushingReceivingScoringPuntingKickoffsReturnsField GoalsTotal DefenseTurnovers


Total Defense - Total Yards/Game
Team G Plys Yds/G Y/P FD/G 3rd Md 3rd Att 3rd % 4th Md 4th Att 4th % Pen PenYds TOP TF L
Washington 2 119 223.0 3.7 12.5 4 26 15.4 0 2 0 14 94 28:34 5 2
Miami 2 124 226.5 3.7 13.5 9 31 29.0 0 0 0 10 74 30:58 4 1
Tampa Bay 2 116 236.5 4.1 11.0 7 31 22.6 0 0 0 10 82 29:32 4 1
Oakland 2 113 240.0 4.2 15.5 10 25 40.0 2 3 66.7 10 75 29:48 2 1
Denver 2 101 247.0 4.9 11.5 5 23 21.7 0 1 0 19 155 25:38 1 0
Buffalo 2 116 249.0 4.3 13.0 10 28 35.7 3 3 100.0 19 146 27:54 0 0
San Francisco 2 115 264.5 4.6 15.5 7 25 28.0 1 1 100.0 16 158 27:21 6 1
Seattle 2 126 276.0 4.4 14.5 7 29 24.1 0 1 0 9 73 30:03 5 3
Baltimore 2 117 280.0 4.8 13.5 8 28 28.6 0 0 0 15 127 27:57 1 1
Carolina 2 131 280.0 4.3 19.5 13 28 46.4 1 2 50.0 16 165 31:25 2 1

thats hard to read so ill go look it up. Our defense has kicked ass though.

Of course, this is startign to look liek the year under Lewis, where we had the number five defense. Rankings are based solely on yards, and since our offense turns the ball over so much right now it makes the yardage less. Of course this isnt really true, because ramsey likes to turn it over inside the ten...but brunell would turn it over on our side of the field.

Our defense has been awsome. They have let in less touchdowns than our offense (2 to 1 ) In fact, the one touchdown they did let in was off of a turnover. Hopefully this group keeps up, cause they can carry us to a ok record before our offense starts to click.

[url]http://nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-TOTAL/2004/regular?sort_col_1=4[/url]

Points against our Offense: 14
Points scored against our Defense: 16 - 10 off of turnovers, and 3 from a 3 & out after a long kick-off return.

Not bad.....for the D that is!

If (WHEN) our offense stops turning the ball over, we will be unstoppable!!!

:dallas:

we're #1 in yards per game (223), yards per play (3.7, tied with miami), 3rd downs made (4), 3rd down % (15.4, no ones close to this), tied for first with 0 4th downs made....
great numbers overall.

whats TF and L? having a brain fart...

Maybe Turnovers Forced , and lost or somthing like that?

[b]1)Dallas 2 137 432.0 6.3 23.5 12 28 42.9 3 4 75.0 20 239 32:56 5 3 [/b]
Minnesota 2 124 412.5 6.7 24.0 12 22 54.5 2 2 100.0 15 110 34:05 4 1
Indianapolis 2 129 409.5 6.3 27.5 12 22 54.5 1 1 100.0 5 41 28:23 3 3
New York (A) 2 126 409.0 6.5 23.0 12 24 50.0 0 1 0 5 29 33:47 4 1
New England 2 127 389.5 6.1 23.0 13 24 54.2 0 0 0 20 134 31:48 4 2
Philadelphia 2 112 385.5 6.9 20.0 10 19 52.6 0 0 0 11 75 27:09 1 1
Denver 2 140 384.5 5.5 22.0 11 29 37.9 1 1 100.0 11 92 34:22 6 2
San Francisco 2 140 364.5 5.2 21.5 12 30 40.0 1 1 100.0 20 182 32:39 6 3
St. Louis 2 115 364.0 6.3 20.5 10 24 41.7 2 2 100.0 17 130 32:00 3 3
Houston 2 127 361.0 5.7 22.0 12 23 52.2 1 2 50.0 15 157 30:20 6 4
New York (N) 2 128 345.0 5.4 17.0 6 28 21.4 1 4 25.0 13 80 28:53 5 2


If we cut down on the penalties, especially in or near the redzone. you will really have your hands full

I think it's Total Fumbles and Lost

Skins's opponents have had 5 total fumbles and lost 2...I think

still need our offense to carry us part of the way... we'll see

posted by KMD24 on a cowboys board:

[quote]Depends on how he gets his 100. Dallas can afford to give up one or two long runs to Portis. On the season, Portis has 18 runs (of 48 total - that's nearly 38%) of 1 yard or less. He can spring a big one, but the Washington OL isn't good enough right now to give him the consistent running lanes he had in Denver.

Portis managed 148 rushing yards against Tampa Bay, but the Skins only scored 16 points. Despite all his rushing yards, Washington's longest drive in that game was 4:52, resulting in a FG. Of their 13 drives, only 5 were more than 5 plays.

Washington's offense continued to struggle against New York. Of Washington's 15 drives, only two consisted of more than 5 plays. Washington held the ball for 5:15 and 5:30 on those drives. The next longest drive was 2:14.

Simply put, you're looking at an offense that can't string together a series of good plays with any consistency.

Given that, I think Dallas will get plenty of opportunities on offense. Washington's defensive numbers are exaggerated because they have played two woeful opponents. Tampa Bay managed only 6 points against Seattle, and the Giants managed only 17 against Philly[/quote]

A lotta truth here too..

I think Dallas will load up on the run and let Ramsey and your offense try and beat us via the pass

The same philosophy our opponents used against us with QuINTcy Retarder last year--beat us through the air

Im not saying PR is QC or comparing Ramsey to QC, just the same philosophy

the giants had a real offense, the boys run game is nowhere close right now, though you've got better WRs...

[QUOTE=That Guy]the giants had a real offense, the boys run game is nowhere close right now, though you've got better WRs...[/QUOTE]

Our run game has gotten off to a slow start ...cant deny that

George is gonna give ya around 3 yards a pop.. Richie Anderson back this week is a help...but the guy who gives us the speed and the big play ability is ReShard Lee...and he's 222 LBS

And the best thing (as opposed to Julius Jones) is he runs North/South and has good cutback ability and good elusiveness

Julius Jones maybe placed on IR

The Giants have a real offense? The only thing offensive about that team is their body odor.

That's great about are D. But we still need to score! And not drop the rock 7 FREEKING times!!! I can't wait to see if we can get it right monday! :dallas: :dallas: :dallas: :party