OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

[URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/sports/20070618-122312-8593r_page2.htm"]Check this article out, Smoot finally answers ?3[/URL]

[QUOTE] "There were never any hard feelings with me and the Redskins," Smoot said. "I realized the situation they were in monetarily [during contract negotiations in 2004-05]. [B]It wasn't as close as everybody thinks it was. Most of their offer was on the back end. I wanted a contract to make me secure. [/B]That was a decision I had to live with. I most definitely regret leaving. I missed the playoff year, and I know I could've been a big help last year, too." [/QUOTE]

Does this mean the question is solved, or is the real mystery just beginning?

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

He never really gave a direct answer. He gave us a couple of clues but I am not ready to close the book on Q3. Not now, NOT EVER!!!! [B]LONG LIVE QUESTION 3[/B]

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

You're probably right. We wants us to think that he answered THE question so that it will just sort of go away.
I'm glad to see that he couldn't pull the wool over your eyes Giggity.

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

Somewhere Wewhite feels vindicated today. LOL

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

I...I...just don't know how to feel. Should I laugh? Should I cry?! :( :mad: :confused:

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

oh my god. i think i feel the same way as when the Davinci code was cracked. I'm with gigitty, long live Q#3!

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

Do you think that when Smoot used the term "on the back end" he was really referring to his contract?

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

foreshadowing of the love boat? hahaha

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

[quote=ArtMonkDrillz;319411]Do you think that when Smoot used the term "on the back end" he was really referring to his contract?[/quote]He was probably like: "Back end???? I dont swing that way coach!!

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

The question was originally questioned to gibbs. THe Holy thread's title was once, did you hear my question i asked gibbs(or something like that). It was an important descripition of the question and one that was put there for us to use today. I will wait on the word of Gibbs.

?3 is forever.

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

What is question 3?

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

[quote=gabe1984;319421]What is question 3?[/quote]
what isn't ?3 ?

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

That was a "Grassy Knoll" answer to distract us.

The Question is yet unanswered for me still.

peace

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

[QUOTE=BigSKINBauer;319418]The question was originally questioned to gibbs. THe Holy thread's title was once, did you hear my question i asked gibbs(or something like that). It was an important descripition of the question and one that was put there for us to use today. I will wait on the word of Gibbs.

?3 is forever.[/QUOTE]You're right about that, and I was thinking about whether or not this counts as an answer to the question when I started this thread.
On the one hand, the question was about Smoot, so I do feel that he's in a position to answer it.
But on the other hand, it was posed to Gibbs so he is probably the only one who actually holds the Golden Key.

Like I said before, maybe Smoot is just trying to fool all of us. I bet that either the CIA or the Stone Masons put him up to it.

Re: OMG - Smoot finally answers Question 3!!!
 

After much thought, can one of the mods please change the thread title to something like [I]"Smoot alludes to the answer to Question 3"[/I] or something along those lines?
Please, and thank you.