Czaban Back on the Air
 

The Bald Boob is Back. You guys told me last week that he got canned. Just a lousy one-game suspension. Is there no justice in this life?

He claims to have a "theory" about the Unknown Redskins but we have to listen to his hideous radio program to hear the details. Pass. I'd rather listen to Micheal Irvin on the Dan Patrick show.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

i like his radio program. i can't listen though. someone tell me what he says tomarrow about who said the stufff.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

I'm glad he is back. I doubt he will change, hopefully he will be harsh, and just not attack people like he did to Brunell.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

I had heard he was just celebrating his grandfather's birthday, or something like that, last week. No actual suspension.

Thought it was interesting, and a bit off-base, that he said the only reason the team ran well is because they had no choice since the passing game was non-existent

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

Yeah. NFL teams hate it when they have to resort to running the football.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=TAFKAS;251140]I had heard he was just celebrating his grandfather's birthday, or something like that, last week. No actual suspension.

Thought it was interesting, and a bit off-base, that he said the only reason the team ran well is because they had no choice since the passing game was non-existent[/quote]
if czaban was in the W.W.E., he would be the first one getting pile drived right thru a table. i hate his style.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

Czaban was his typical self yesterday. Made some good observations, some lame one's (like the running game remark) and some very predictable ones.

I would love to do a comedy show commentating on the Comcast Post Game Show like they do on Comedy Central for the State of the Union. The first thing I would have said was I wonder how long before Czaban goes for the "why didn't they do this sooner angle".

It didn't take long.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

The post game show is better with Czab.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=70Chip;251141]Yeah. NFL teams hate it when they have to resort to running the football.[/quote]

Yeah especially a Gibbs led team. He really hates running the ball, even though he was preaching the emphasis on that all week.

Go figure.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=Mattyk72;251249]Yeah especially a Gibbs led team. He really hates running the ball, even though he was preaching the emphasis on that all week.

Go figure.[/QUOTE]

The redskins ran the ball so much yesterday because that was about all they could do. The passing game was terrible and the game was low scoring so the game itself dictated run. Thats more of the reason the skins ran the ball than any back to redskin football baloney.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=irish;251270]The redskins ran the ball so much yesterday because that was about all they could do. The passing game was terrible and the game was low scoring so the game itself dictated run. Thats more of the reason the skins ran the ball than any back to redskin football baloney.[/QUOTE]

So you think they started the game hoping to air it out but when they couldn't they had no choice but to play smashmouth football??

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=Mattyk72;251249]Yeah especially a Gibbs led team. He really hates running the ball, even though he was preaching the emphasis on that all week.

Go figure.[/quote]
Yeah I dont really get that, does he expect us to play like the Colts or the Eagles? Even the Colts went back to a running game last night. I really think he doesnt have any patience in general. This is in regards to coaching, performance, and scoring.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=irish;251270]The redskins ran the ball so much yesterday because that was about all they could do. The passing game was terrible and the game was low scoring so the game itself dictated run. Thats more of the reason the skins ran the ball than any back to redskin football baloney.[/quote]

They ran the ball yesterday because #1 that's what Gibbs wanted to get back to, playing physical smashmouth ball. From last week's postgame presser that's what Gibbs was preaching, about getting back to playing their style of ball.

And #2 because they were running effectively.

I don't see why they should have to apologize for running the ball, with our OL and backs and given Campbell's inexperience, why would they not run the ball?

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

i actually kinda like czaban, atleast he asks the tough questions that everyone else is afraid to ask

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

I dont think they expected to come out gunning like the Colts (they dont have the horses for that), and I certainly dont think they need to apologize for running the ball because it was working great. I think as the game progressed and it was apparent that JC could not hit the side of a barn and the run was working it was best to pound the ball with the run. In addition, the score was low and close so they could keep running, had they been down by 10 or 15 they would not have been able to run quite as much as they did as its hard to play comeback from a big defecit with a running game.

To me the reason the redskins had not been playing redskin football (besides the fact they brought in an offensive coordinator to implement a high flying offense with a 700 page playbook) is that they were often behind in games and had to pass the ball a lot in an effort to get back in the game. Yesterday they didnt have to do that so they could run.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

Not that it matters, but did anyone hear Czaben's theory on who the "deep throat" was for the Skins????

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=Redskins_P;251310]Not that it matters, but did anyone hear Czaben's theory on who the "deep throat" was for the Skins????[/QUOTE]

Yes, he thinks its Springs.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

springs said in an interview it wasnt him, and that if it was him he would have said it to williams' face because they have that "good of a relationship"

he could be lying but i dont think it is him. im actually thinking it might be griffin

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=irish;251312]Yes, he thinks its Springs.[/QUOTE]

What led him to think that?

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

At this point I'm tired of hearing names being thrown around, I mean c'mon Griffin? He was actually pretty ticked off over the whole thing when he was asked.

You have to think that the coaches have a pretty good idea of where this may have come from, and they are handling everything the way it should be handled, all internally.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=irish;251312]Yes, he thinks its Springs.[/quote]
Yeah well it doesnt take a genius to make that guess. We all thought that when the article first came out.

Now it is obviously not him, if you have been paying attention to the interviews and the radio after the game.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=Mattyk72;251318]At this point I'm tired of hearing names being thrown around, I mean c'mon Griffin? He was actually pretty ticked off over the whole thing when he was asked.

You have to think that the coaches have a pretty good idea of where this may have come from, and they are handling everything the way it should be handled, all internally.[/quote]

It is probably AA or someone else on the bench in the secondary, beside Springs no one comes to mind. And it isnt him, so bamm

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=hooskins;251319]Yeah well it doesnt take a genius to make that guess. We all thought that when the article first came out.

Now it is obviously not him, if you have been paying attention to the interviews and the radio after the game.[/QUOTE]

I didnt say it was Springs Czab did. That said, just because Springs says it wasnt him doesnt mean it wasnt.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

look. read the comments. it has to be someone who has been on the team a while, witht he comments about bringing in new guys all the time, that rules out archuleta since he just got here. he doesnt know anything about the past of this team really besides we were solid. it cant be a young guy i dotn think, because of the talk of the buddy ryan stuff, i think that rules out rogers, and sean taylor who it hought it may be at first. i dotn think it was daniels or wynn. doubt its salave'a or marshall, where would they be without williams? nowhere. that leaves springs, washington, and griffen. after springs' comments i doubt its him. i never heard the griffen comments matty so i cant judge, and i just cant see washington saying stuff like that, i guess its possible

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=irish;251333]I didnt say it was Springs Czab did. That said, just because Springs says it wasnt him doesnt mean it wasnt.[/quote]

I am not saying it that you said it was Springs. I am point out Czab is a retard, because almost everyone on this forum thought it was Springs too. We didnt need some "super secret" message to let us know.

And it really isnt him. You havent been reading his quotes. First one I read went something like "Anyone can be a TO in this league, but if you wanna say something like that, put your name on it". Second one was something like "My father would be beyond mad if I said anything like that, that is not how I was raised." It isnt Springs...

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=hooskins;251339]I am not saying it that you said it was Springs. I am point out Czab is a retard, because almost everyone on this forum thought it was Springs too. We didnt need some "super secret" message to let us know.

And it really isnt him. You havent been reading his quotes. First one I read went something like "Anyone can be a TO in this league, but if you wanna say something like that, put your name on it". Second one was something like "My father would be beyond mad if I said anything like that, that is not how I was raised." It isnt Springs...[/QUOTE]

Like I said, just because he says something does not mean its true.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=irish;251351]Like I said, just because he says something does not mean its true.[/quote]

Ok... If Springs was the person in the article, AND he said all that stuff to the media, that would be very unprofessional.

To me chances are slim to none it was Springs, more like none.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=hooskins;251356]Ok... If Springs was the person in the article, AND he said all that stuff to the media, that would be very unprofessional.

To me chances are slim to none it was Springs, more like none.[/QUOTE]

I totally agree. No way it was Springs.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

they ran the ball because bulger got sacked 7 times last week when the rams tried to throw the ball. Saunders and gibbs did their homework this week, they were attempting to buy some time for campbell by setting up for the playaction. In the beggining it wasnt working cause the panthers D-line was fresh, but eventually they wore down, and the run game opened up for the pass game to work effectively........Cooley.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

I dont know who said it, nor do I care. Who ever said it did a great service to the team by getting them fired up for yesterday's game. They did a good thing.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

One thing is for certain, Joe Gibbs knows who said it, if there's any truth to the whole matter. If the statements in that ESPN article are accurate, players should be careful how they speak (so called off the record) without knowing the reputation and history of whom they're speaking, and their relationship with the team.
I mentioned in another post that there's nothing that goes on with this team that Bubba Tyer dosen't know, and he tells Gibbs everything. The author of that article is no stranger to redskin park, if memory serves me correctly, he was a beat writer for the team during portions of Gibbs first tenure. There won't be any secrets here, the culprit has been exposed to Gibbs.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=Longtimefan;251414]One thing is for certain, Joe Gibbs knows who said it, if there's any truth to the whole matter. If the statements in that ESPN article are accurate, players should be careful how they speak (so called off the record) without knowing the reputation and history of whom they're speaking, and their relationship with the team.
I mentioned in another post that there's nothing that goes on with this team that Bubba Tyer dosen't know, and he tells Gibbs everything. The author of that article is no stranger to redskin park, if memory serves me correctly, he was a beat writer for the team during portions of Gibbs first tenure. There won't be any secrets here, the culprit has been exposed to Gibbs.[/quote]

Are you sure the team knows exactly who it was? I hope they do, because I have it narrowed down to a handful of players. Obviously they have more resources than all of us combined, we just have to wait till the offseason.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[QUOTE=hooskins;251416]Are you sure the team knows exactly who it was? I hope they do, because I have it narrowed down to a handful of players. Obviously they have more resources than all of us combined, we just have to wait till the offseason.[/QUOTE]



I won't say the team knows who said what, or if it was said at all, but if it was said Joe Gibbs knows who said it. He may never reveal to the public that he knows who said what, if it was said, because that's the nature of Joe Gibbs, he would never do that, but believe me, there's nothing that goes on having anything to do with this team the Joe Gibbs dosen't know about. All of his older players know and will attest to that fact. Some of the younger players with this Gibbs tenure might not be quite as familiar, but if they stay around long enough, they'll know too.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

what exactly did z get suspended for?they have to pipe sunshine in this little town where i live.what article and what did zbanon
are you guys talking about?

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=Redskinhog1963;251463]what exactly did z get suspended for?they have to pipe sunshine in this little town where i live.what article and what did zbanon
are you guys talking about?[/quote]


He wasn't suspended it turns out. He had to go to a birthday party. Which was apparently scheduled in 1998 before he started covering the Redskins on Sundays. I thought he had been fired because that was what was being said here last Monday after Mike Wise sat in for him. He wasn't, which was a great diappointment to me since he's a complete terd.

The reason we thought he had been fired was he had pissed off Brunell by asking a provocative and pointless question. Also there were several clues on the covers of various Beatles Albums.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

[quote=70Chip;251486]He wasn't suspended it turns out. He had to go to a birthday party. Which was apparently scheduled in 1998 before he started covering the Redskins on Sundays. I thought he had been fired because that was what was being said here last Monday after Mike Wise sat in for him. He wasn't, which was a great diappointment to me since he's a complete terd.

The reason we thought he had been fired was he had pissed off Brunell by asking a provocative and pointless question. Also there were several clues on the covers of various Beatles Albums.[/quote]

I thought what he say was retarded, but at the same time I do not support censorship. I dont care what he says, if it is stupid it helps me justify that my opinion is correct.

Re: Czaban Back on the Air
 

I don't know where anyone ever got the idea he was suspended in the first place. I had not read, or heard that anywhere else but here. When I read it here I was looking for any other reports to confirm what was suggested, but to no avail.
Maybe Mark Brunell didn't like the question that was put to him, but certainly that's no reason to suspend the guy who asked the question.