Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[url=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/specials/preview/2006/scout.report/index.html]SI.com - NFL Preview[/url]

no way every team in the east goes 9-7, but they put redskins at #1...too bad they say they're gonna lose in the first round of the playoffs

SI blows

and that is the gayest picture on there...why is joey porter wearing shoulder pads without a shirt

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

the phins get too much credit

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=steveo395;209879][URL="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/specials/preview/2006/scout.report/index.html"]SI.com - NFL Preview[/URL]

no way every team in the east goes 9-7, but they put redskins at #1...too bad they say they're gonna lose in the first round of the playoffs

SI blows

and that is the gayest picture on there...why is joey porter wearing shoulder pads without a shirt[/quote]

Yeah that's easily the most ridiculous prediction ever. All four go 9-7?

I think Dr. Z drummed up these predictions. He's senile.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

I predict everyone goes undefeated.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

bengals go 8-8? i doubt that... i don't think these predictions are any good. and that's a truly horrible cover.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

three teams from the east making the playoffs...not sure i agree with that one.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

What they are basically saying is we really can't predict who will win this division. Also, they have Cowboys and Giants making the playoff as NFC wild-card teams.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

The NFC east I think will be a low win division with only the winner making the playoffs. The division games are tough, add in the NFC South. We're going to have a lot of great teams slugging it out and stealing wins from each other. I could see an NFC North or NFC West team being able to steal WCs from both of these divisions just because of strength of schedule.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

hahaha, the dolphins?? and over the colts of all teams?!? that prediction alone completely invalidates the entire grid. way to go SI...

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

Good point Daseal

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

How long has it taken us to figure that Dr. Z is an imbecile. Here some definite problems with this preview.

1. Every team including the Eagles going 9-7.

2. The Dolphins not only going 11-5 but also going to the freaking superbowl!

3. The 49ers winning more 3 games.

4. The Jets winning more then 3 games.

5. The freaking Ravens having a better record then the Bengals.

6. The Bears going 11-5 again in an improving NFC North.

7. The Rams winning 9 freaking games? What is that.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

Cop-out predictions.

Grow some balls and go out on a limb and make a prediction.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

Dr. Z was hittin the Ol' hootch

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=steveo395;209879][URL="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/specials/preview/2006/scout.report/index.html"]SI.com - NFL Preview[/URL]

no way every team in the east goes 9-7, but they put redskins at #1...too bad they say they're gonna lose in the first round of the playoffs

SI blows

and that is the gayest picture on there...why is joey porter wearing shoulder pads without a shirt[/quote]

Ain't it, I think it looks a little flakey too.......and his lips looks like a sheeps ****Y

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

Yeah Dr. Z hit the nail on the head last year when he made our prediction.


You know what, I hate those car commercials with the guy called dr. z because of SI's Dr.Z. F... the Z.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=NAVYSKINSFAN;209881]the phins get too much credit[/quote]

I don't see the Panthers making the SB either. Playoffs yes, SB, no.

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=BMF21;210011]...and his lips looks like a sheeps ****Y[/quote]

+1 for creativity

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=steveo395;209879][URL="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/specials/preview/2006/scout.report/index.html"]SI.com - NFL Preview[/URL]

no way every team in the east goes 9-7, but they put redskins at #1...too bad they say they're gonna lose in the first round of the playoffs

SI blows

and that is the gayest picture on there...why is joey porter wearing shoulder pads without a shirt[/quote]

Hey, it's better than this pose: [IMG]http://www.fauvestudios.com/pix/about/bo.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

man this is dumbest prediction ever

No way all the NFC East teams go 9-7 that's just DUMB

No way 3 teams from the NFC East go to the playoffs specially with a 9-7 record with Tampa, Arizona, Atlanta having really easy schedules. I only see 1 9-7 as a wild card and that's a long shot. ( I agree with the assessment that probably only 1 team from the division might make it, even though I believe 2 is a better scenario).

No way Miami beats Pitts and the Patriots in the playoffs and noway Denver beats NE.

And no way the ravens go to the playoffs and cincy doesn't not real

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=D'BOYZ;210138]man this is dumbest prediction ever

No way all the NFC East teams go 9-7 that's just DUMB

No way 3 teams from the NFC East go to the playoffs specially with a 9-7 record with tampa, arizona, atlanta having rerally easy schedulles. I only see 1 9-7 as a wild card and that's a long shot. ( I agree with the assesment that probably only 1 team from the division might make it, even thougt I believe 2 is a better scenario). [/quote]


Good to see that you've finally realized the Cowboys will have a miserable season. :)

Re: Sports Illustrated Predicted Standings
 

[quote=D'BOYZ;210138]man this is dumbest prediction ever

No way all the NFC East teams go 9-7 that's just DUMB

No way 3 teams from the NFC East go to the playoffs specially with a 9-7 record with Tampa, Arizona, Atlanta having really easy schedules. I only see 1 9-7 as a wild card and that's a long shot. ( I agree with the assessment that probably only 1 team from the division might make it, even though I believe 2 is a better scenario).

No way Miami beats Pitts and the Patriots in the playoffs and noway Denver beats NE.

And no way the ravens go to the playoffs and cincy doesn't not real[/quote]I agree with a lot of what you are saying D'BOYS.

There is no reasonable way I see Denver beating out BOTH KC and SD this year. How sure am I? I've put Oakland ahead of them.

2 teams will come out of the NFC East. I'm tempted to say Cowboys and Skins, but if Washington doesn't come out of the gates fighting, I could see New York and Dallas making the playoffs and Washington left at home.

The Ravens MIGHT be the worst team in football. There are a lot of teams who are potentially worse, like the Titans, Raiders, Bills, Jets, and Packers, but to put a team that might be the worst team in the NFL in the playoffs is asinine. (On a lighter note, let the record show that GTripp is considering picking the Texans for a wild card)

I'm with Matty. Make a prediction. Why would anyone bother to read rankings that give no insight. It's the same thing we've seen all offseason. Everyones picking the Dolphins. For good reason. Pick the Falcons or the Cards or someone to go deep into the playoffs. Pick some bad teams like the Niners and Texans to improve to the .500 plateau (it happens every year, its really not hard to predict). Don't say the Raiders will be 4-12, that cliche. No team will be worse than 5-11 unless they get hit hard by injuries, so why pick the Texans and the Raiders to do so. Pick Baltimore or St. Louis, someone who was better than that last year.

That's how you make predictions that are worth reading without making a complete fool of yourself like Skip Bayless.

Dr. Z, you say you've been covering the NFL for more than 40 years. I've been alive for 18. How the hell do I know more than you? Dear lord.