![]() |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=Mattyk;823379]Or you just work a 3 team deal. Taking the risk of trading for someone in hopes of being able to turn around and trade him right away doesn't make much sense at all.[/quote]
I think I heard a rumor like that our 1st & A Hole for the lambs 1st last year. OH well I like what were doing now, can't cry over spilt milk. |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=CultBrennan59;823366]seeing this thread reminded me;
I was listening to ESPN 980 the other day, and I heard [B]I think it was steve czaban[/B], saying that he heard from a high ranking redskins official, that last year Mike Shanahan wanted Bradford badly.[/quote] I listen to Czab in the morning and he is hilarious in a hybrid homer simpson/george costanza sort of way. But you really gotta fact check the sh*t his says. he gives some bad info. I still remember when Czab ask Mark Brunell if he would bench himself for the better of the team on CSN. Classic. |
Re: sam bradford
You would think the next Peyton Manning would be better then Colt McCoy.
Not saying that Bradford isn't gonna be a good QB but you would think that people would either temper the Peyton Manning or start mentioning McCoy in the same ligth. |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=30gut;823361]Just thought I'd pass along that both Football Outsiders and ESPN's new QBR have Colt McCoy's rookie season ahead or Sam Bradford.
So you can add them to the list of people not in their right minds.[/quote] No hate for mccoy here. I'm just going to bring this tread back up in 3 years when bradford is a superstar. |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=NYCskinfan82;823378]Why go through all that when you could just offer your 1st & 2nd. I think SS story sounds more beleiveable.[/quote]
That's what I say, but again this is what I heard on the radio the other day. |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=skinster;823398]No hate for mccoy here. I'm just going to bring this tread back up in 3 years when bradford is a superstar.[/quote]
Am I right to take it that you're conceding for now that your statement that: "nobody in their right mind thinks McCoy is even close to Bradford" Was a bit off? Unless you think the Football Outsiders stats and the TQBR aren't in their right minds? |
Re: sam bradford
Eli Manning and Matt Schaub are both franchise quarterbacks, and both surely better than Joe Flacco.
|
Re: sam bradford
[quote=jonny5dicky;823645]Eli Manning and Matt Schaub are both franchise quarterbacks, and both surely better than Joe Flacco.[/quote]
I wouldn't say Franchise QB's for Schaub he hasn't even made a Playoff appearance yet.. Flacco is JC imo |
Re: sam bradford
[quote=jonny5dicky;823645]Eli Manning and Matt Schaub are both franchise quarterbacks, and both surely better than Joe Flacco.[/quote]
What are you talking about? Flacco matched Eli's career year numbers in literally half the time (3 years to 6). Schuab fine but Eli? Thats just good old fashion hatting. |
Re: sam bradford
I would take Eli Manning over Flacco any day....look at Flacco's playoff figures, I don't think they're good. But then again, I'd take Rex Grossman over Flacco also. Rex is the man, the savior of D.C. He's going to surpass Brad Johnson's numbers of the '99 season when the Redskins had the 2nd best offense in the NFL.
|
Re: sam bradford
It's funny we probably could have drafted Rex Grossman and Jabar Gaffney instead of Patrick Ramsey and Taylor Jacobs in '02 and '03. The Redskins management has really been ridiculous season after season, but I believe this is really the turn of the Redskins and it will be led by Rex Grossman. I remember wishing we hadn't drafted Patrick Ramsey so we would be going after Grossman the next draft. I bet Spurrier didn't want to draft Ramsey, and if he had the chance to get Grossman I bet his offense would have been a lot more dynamic. Grossman led the Bears to the super bowl his first season as a starter. I really look at the rest of the NFL for being pretty stupid for not getting this guy, basically because I know he can play and the Redskins are going to surprise the NFL. The Redskins receiving core is actually good too even though it didn't look that way a month ago. I really like how Terrence Austin has been looking.
|
Re: sam bradford
[quote=jonny5dicky;823645]Eli Manning and Matt Schaub are both franchise quarterbacks, and both surely better than Joe Flacco.[/quote]
??? |
Re: sam bradford
I was responding to like the beginning of this post lol
|
Re: sam bradford
Eli is overrated. He had the one SB and it will be all downhill from there. He ahs a nasty tendency to throw INTs when the game is on the line or real close. Favre started doing this when he hit the big 36. How old is Eli?
|
Re: sam bradford
[quote=GusFrerotte;823691]Eli is overrated. He had the one SB and it will be all downhill from there. He ahs a nasty tendency to throw INTs when the game is on the line or real close. Favre started doing this when he hit the big 36. How old is Eli?[/quote]
Favre always threw picks in big/any moments. For some reason though he was always given a pass by the media on this, when he threw a stupid pick it was because he was a "gun slinger" |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.