Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid! (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=38356)

MTK 09-13-2010 04:33 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.

Monkeydad 09-13-2010 04:35 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=firstdown;732925]What the hell was he yelling. "Hey ass holes see we didn't even need that f***ing touchdown I dropped".[/quote]

It's only funny because we won.

Sundberg could have yelled something similar.

firstdown 09-13-2010 04:42 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
I did not realize how well that ball was thrown until I just saw the pic in the above link. I hope it was just his nerves and this is not the start of any trend.

MTK 09-13-2010 04:54 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
The first fade to Armstrong was right on the money, he just flat out dropped it. The 2nd was better defended, but the pass was still right there.

Dirtbag59 09-13-2010 04:56 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
We should put in Thomas if for nothing more then the fact that he's among the better blockers playing receiver.

diehard 09-13-2010 04:57 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.

mooby 09-13-2010 05:07 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.

Dirtbag59 09-13-2010 05:11 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=diehard;732951]Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.[/quote]

I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.


[quote=Mattyk;732932]I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.[/quote]

I pray you're right.

redskin37 09-13-2010 05:15 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
Joey Galloway will be benched and or cut by week 4. How he is staring is crazy.

Longtimefan 09-13-2010 05:43 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=mooby;732953]You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.[/quote]

He got in briefly on a couple of plays, got a penalty for holding and I didn't see much of him after that.

theJBexperience 09-13-2010 09:35 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?

GusFrerotte 09-13-2010 09:44 PM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=Dirtbag359;732954]I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.




I pray you're right.[/quote]

Not sure about Armstrong more close in breaking out than DT. I know it is one game, but so far, he doesn't look like he is going anywhere. I am thinking WR will be a top priority in the draft or the next FA signing period, or both. I love our TE's but you can't always target them.

KI Skins Fan 09-14-2010 12:03 AM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=theJBexperience;733020]So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?[/quote]

He should have.

The Goat 09-14-2010 12:26 AM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
[quote=Lotus;732905]My thought exactly. As long as we have invisible WR's we should be getting Cooley and Davis on the field and catching balls at the same time. I'm not sure why that didn't happen last night.[/quote]

Word. It's a glaring "mystery." Davis is nearly as agile as a WR and arguably has better hands than any (WR) on the roster. Throw him in the slot and Cooley at TE.

I agree w/ those who think Thomas should get his reps out there. He's still got the most potential of any WR on the roster. Maybe the Shanny's are working him in easy, which would make sense considering it's the elephant in the room (how much pressure/expectation there is for him).

SportsFanatic 09-14-2010 08:25 AM

Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
 
The main thing Mcnabb did on Snday night that impressed me was keeping drives alive and not turning the ball over. I'm sure the TD's will come as we move forward in the season.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.30113 seconds with 9 queries