Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1253220]The hypocrisy is expected. I have a governor who nickname was coonman at VMI and had a picture of him either in a KKK outfit or blackface along with a LT Gov who has accused of rape at duke and sexual assault following a national DNC event... liberals happily give a pass.

Of course the coward Kimmel takes a 2 month break...he knew this was coming out.

I just wonder what minority voters thinks when they keep seeing this continuing to come from the liberal elite? That’s their party? It’s puzzling[/quote]

chico , you're sad ,very sad.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1253217]The hypocrisy of the NYPD Police Union.

Shake Shack story about cops being poisoned was false .. and made up by the NYPD Union.

Investigation and surveillance footage reveals no wrong doing but perhaps the machine wasnt rinsed enough.[/quote]


Like you're making up this story here chico? Considering the present environment that Police are dealing with it was a reasonable assumption. Not a made up lie as you claim but you will keep lying about these things just to keep your bias agenda going.


The sad thing is chico had it been one of your shakes you would sue the shit out of the company and be crying left and right,like you are now.

[url]https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/us/nypd-officers-sick-shake-shack-trnd/index.html[/url]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Giantone;1253223]Like you're making up this story here chico? Considering the present environment that Police are dealing with it was a reasonable assumption. Not a made up lie as you claim but you will keep lying about these things just to keep your bias agenda going.


The sad thing is chico had it been one of your shakes you would sue the shit out of the company and be crying left and right,like you are now.

[url]https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/16/us/nypd-officers-sick-shake-shack-trnd/index.html[/url][/quote]

Like all public unions such as teachers...the police unions should be broken up.

How you like that butter cup? I’m glad you and sunnyside agree with the dismantling of them.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=mooby;1182530]I deliberately left the end blank so this can be a bipartisan discussion. It doesn't have to be about politics either, let's talk about the hypocrisy of anybody you feel is worthy.

For instance, the hypocrisy of the right, in that when Obama is president, every single major bill passed the main argument was about adding to the deficit. But now that Congress and our President is Republican, adding another tril to the deficit for the tax bill is just a necessary thing we have to do for some tax breaks.

Just so Chico doesn't think this is another excuse to attack the poor innocent right wingers, I also thought it would be interesting to discuss Rose McGowan's attacks on her fellow Hollywooders like [URL="https://www.thedailybeast.com/rose-mcgowan-calls-out-alyssa-milano-for-supporting-weinstein-ex-georgina-chapman"]Alyssa Milano[/URL] and [URL="https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/rose-mcgowan-slams-meryl-streep-over-harvey-weinstein/ar-BBGpkVf?li=BBnb2gh"]Meryl Streep[/URL]. Seems she's not cool with Milano/Streep feigning outrage about Weinstein when Weinstein's soon-to-be ex-wife got on board with him for the money and the connections, and supposedly they knew about all the allegations.[/quote]
What's adding trillions of dollars to the deficit is the social programs that continue to grow. We've actually seen increases in revenue since the tax bill was passed.

[quote=Giantone;1253124]Barr is what we all thought he was, a trump hack!


[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/mueller-report-details-highlight-trumps-143553934.html[/url]


Barr had put forward a “distorted” and “misleading” account of the Mueller report findings in a fashion that downplayed the special counsel’s more damaging findings and shaped the public narrative in the president’s favor, Walton wrote.

“These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility,” he wrote — and in turn, cast doubt on the department’s statements to him that the redactions were lawful.


After Trump attacked the prosecutors’ recommendation for a stiff prison term on Twitter, Barr intervened and the department asked for a more lenient sentence — an extraordinary reversal that stunned legal experts and department veterans. Four career prosecutors withdrew from the case in protest, and one quit the department entirely.

Stone, who is scheduled to report to the Bureau of Prisons by the end of June to start serving his sentence, has expressed hopes that the president will pardon him.[/quote] What exactly did Barr mislead the country about? The entire Russian collusion nonsense was a hoax. There was no evidence from the very beginning. This was a hit job by the federal government on behave of the democrat party. The FISA warrant was issued under false pretenses. The FBI withheld exculpatory evidence against Carter Page. He was working with the CIA and the FBI knew that and lied. They did not verify the Steele Dossier, nor did they inform the FISA court that it was paid for by the opposition party. The sub source for the Steele Dossier stated that Steele flat out lied and exaggerated about the rumors that he told him. Let me not even get into the biggest lie about the Russians hacking the DNC. If that was true why didn't the DNC hand over those servers so the FBI forensics team could verify that the Russians hacked the DNC? Why didn't Jim Comey subpoena those servers? I'll tell you why. It never happened and they never had any evidence that it happened. President Trump didn't do anything wrong.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1253224]Like all [B]public unions [/B]such as teachers...the police unions should be broken up.

How you like that butter cup? I’m glad you and sunnyside agree with the dismantling of them.[/quote]

Public unions ... honestly I dont know enough about public unions to make an informed decision but yes, id lean to not having public unions if you put a gun to my head right now.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1253224]Like all public unions such as teachers...the police unions should be broken up.

How you like that butter cup? I’m glad you and sunnyside agree with the dismantling of them.[/quote]

LOL, chico you're a sad sorry trumpett .You can't even come up with legit arguments anymore,sad,very sad.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1253236]Public unions ... honestly I dont know enough about public unions to make an informed decision but yes, id lean to not having public unions if you put a gun to my head right now.[/quote]

LOL, so you admit to knowing little to nothing about them put you want them gone. LOL.:postcop:

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1253236]Public unions ... honestly I dont know enough about public unions to make an informed decision but yes, id lean to not having public unions if you put a gun to my head right now.[/quote]

You are learning well young Jedi.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Lol yes I can admit I don’t know enough about an issue. Honesty I’d have to do a ton of reading to form an informed opinion.

I know it’s rare, someone on the internet not pretending to be an expert on every single minut talking point. On here I try to link and cite sources to what I read or am saying.

That’s why I went out of my way to condition my response as if I had to choose right now.

Yesh ....

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=MTK;1253190]Digging deep[/quote]

Yes it is but isnt not showing Gone with the wind over the top also? Is every movie featuring slaves going to be pulled of the air now? Is Spartacus not going to be shown anymore because he was a slave?I'm sure not,because it's ok to be a white slave or am I missing something? Is Django going to be pulled?No,I imagine not because he kills all the white people in the end so that's ok :confused?: I dont see the hypocrisy ending anytime soon:rolleyes:

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Yeah the Gone with the Wind drama was definitely over the top

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Just imagine someone like Ryan Seacrest sitting down and spewing both racist and probably the most offensive anti Semitic things I’ve heard:

Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve give you Nick Cannon

[url]https://www.forbes.com/sites/sethcohen/2020/07/13/nick-cannon-spreads-anti-jewish-theories-criticizing-rothschilds-and-zionists/#7f9c136710c8[/url]

Then went on some racist shit:

The people that don't have [melanin] are a little less. They may not have had the compassion when they were sent to the mountains of Caucasus when they didn't have the power of the sun. The sun then started to deteriorate them so then, they're acting out of fear, they're acting out of low self-esteem, they're acting out of a deficiency. So, therefore, the only way that they can act is evil. They have to rob, steal, rape, kill in order to survive. So then, these people that didn't have what we have -- and when I say we, I speak of the melanated people -- they had to be savages. They had to be barbaric because they're in these Nordic mountains. They're acting as animals so they're the ones that are actually closer to animals. They're the ones that are actually the true savages."


Of course Why would the media cover it?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1255170]Just imagine someone like Ryan Seacrest sitting down and spewing both racist and probably the most offensive anti Semitic things I’ve heard:

Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve give you Nick Cannon

[url]https://www.forbes.com/sites/sethcohen/2020/07/13/nick-cannon-spreads-anti-jewish-theories-criticizing-rothschilds-and-zionists/#7f9c136710c8[/url]

Then went on some racist shit:

The people that don't have [melanin] are a little less. They may not have had the compassion when they were sent to the mountains of Caucasus when they didn't have the power of the sun. The sun then started to deteriorate them so then, they're acting out of fear, they're acting out of low self-esteem, they're acting out of a deficiency. So, therefore, the only way that they can act is evil. They have to rob, steal, rape, kill in order to survive. So then, these people that didn't have what we have -- and when I say we, I speak of the melanated people -- they had to be savages. They had to be barbaric because they're in these Nordic mountains. They're acting as animals so they're the ones that are actually closer to animals. They're the ones that are actually the true savages."


Of course Why would the media cover it?[/quote]

Give it time ya dingus. Enough people click that link or start to discuss it and it will get picked up by other mainstream outlets. Next thing you know Nick Cannon is cancelled. (I'm alright with that, I've disliked Cannon for years personally).

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

...Annnnd look who made the front page on MSN:

[url]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/viacomcbs-cuts-ties-with-nick-cannon-over-hateful-speech-and-anti-semitic-comments/ar-BB16KjuD?li=BBnbfcL[/url]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

The Onion: Enraged man accuses the "lame stream media" of not covering a story, by providing news links to the story he claims they are not covering.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1255225]The Onion: Enraged man accuses the "lame stream media" of not covering a story, by providing news links to the story he claims they are not covering.[/quote]

Funny sounds like real life.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Just searched MSNBC and CNN, websites...zero on it

Weird huh?

Famous black says racists and anti Semitic comment...in this current environment and not covered

Weird

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Chico I hear what you are saying ... but to me Nick Cannon is a fringe nobody ... i do think sometimes the factor as to whether a story catches fire is how big of a star it concerns.

Nick Cannon is .. a C list. Maybe because I dont watch whatever shows he is on I view him as a nobody. But Im sure if I watched his shows it would be bigger for me.

Bottom line - do i think the liberal media outlets are making a conscious board room decision to bury the Nick cannon story?

No that just seems silly.

I just dont think Nick Cannon generates much buzz or interest. Its nick cannon, ya know.

----

edit -- look at tucker carlsons writer getting busted for being a racist .. that got very little play, even in the liberal side of the media.

------------

I do think there are liberal media groups and there are conservative media groups.

What i dont get is right wing people so obsessed with "liberal media" while completely ignoring the reality that there is left wing, neutral and right wing media.

A staple of the conservative playbook is to get you guys to think "all media is liberal" and therefore anything negative about Trump is "liberal BS"

The kicker is you then call us sheep .. lol.

The hypocrisy of it all. Searching for anything to scream about the liberal media ... while 100% ignoring the fact that there is right wing and left wing media.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

^ It was a top headline in my USA Today app yesterday.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Why isnt Fox News covering the story of the republican who was just charged with multiple counts of voter fraud!!!!

They buried the story over night and now ... nothing.

Arrrgg! Arggg! Argg!

Right wing media bias!! blah blah blah . ..

I just dont get how a right wing person can be so obsessed with left wing media and ignoring the fact that right wing media does the same thing.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1255249]Chico I hear what you are saying ... but to me Nick Cannon is a fringe nobody ... i do think sometimes the factor as to whether a story catches fire is how big of a star it concerns.

Nick Cannon is .. a C list. Maybe because I dont watch whatever shows he is on I view him as a nobody. But Im sure if I watched his shows it would be bigger for me.

Bottom line - do i think the liberal media outlets are making a conscious board room decision to bury the Nick cannon story?

No that just seems silly.

I just dont think Nick Cannon generates much buzz or interest. Its nick cannon, ya know.

----

edit -- look at tucker carlsons writer getting busted for being a racist .. that got very little play, even in the liberal side of the media.

------------

I do think there are liberal media groups and there are conservative media groups.

What i dont get is right wing people so obsessed with "liberal media" while completely ignoring the reality that there is left wing, neutral and right wing media.

A staple of the conservative playbook is to get you guys to think "all media is liberal" and therefore anything negative about Trump is "liberal BS"

The kicker is you then call us sheep .. lol.

The hypocrisy of it all. Searching for anything to scream about the liberal media ... while 100% ignoring the fact that there is right wing and left wing media.[/quote]

When I search Nick Cannon on MSNBC and CNN, multiple past actual Video pieces and articles pop out about him. So if he is so fringe, why so much coverage about him in the past on both networks?

Now the defense of what he said is a whole other story...

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Honestly idk chico. I dont think im in his demographic so to me, hes a nobody. The first article I have ever read about him was the one you posted.

I imagine he is big news for his targeted demographic .. teenagers and instagram people?

-------------

the melatonin stuff, ive seen it before .. much like white tears and anything Farrakan... hate, stupidity and bigotry.

Im sure cancel culture is doing its thing.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

If it wasn't for Chappelle's show I'd probably barely know who he is lol

"He's hilarious"

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Yayyyy

[URL="https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/entertainment/nick-cannon-viacom-trnd/index.html"]https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/entertainment/nick-cannon-viacom-trnd/index.html[/URL]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Duffman003;1255280]Yayyyy

[URL="https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/entertainment/nick-cannon-viacom-trnd/index.html"]https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/entertainment/nick-cannon-viacom-trnd/index.html[/URL][/quote]

Too late doesn't count

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=MTK;1255297]Too late doesn't count[/quote]

:laughing2

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

republicains, got to love them....................


[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/kansas-freshman-gop-rep-watkins-000957910.html[/url]

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A freshman Kansas congressman who had listed a UPS Inc. postal box as his residence on a state voter registration form was charged Tuesday with three felonies, including illegal voting.

The charges against GOP Rep. Steve Watkins came three weeks before the state's Aug. 4 primary election with fellow Republicans pushing to oust him from the eastern Kansas seat he barely won in 2018, even though he's largely toed the conservative policy line and supported President Donald Trump. GOP critics already had worried that the months-long investigation into whether Watkins violated state election laws puts the 2nd District seat in play if he wins the primary.

Watkins called the charges “hyper-political” even though the district attorney who filed them also is a Republican. The congressman said during a televised debate Tuesday evening that he hadn't seen the charges but has done nothing wrong.

“I'll get my name exonerated," he said during his closing statement.

The charges were filed in state district court in Shawnee County, which includes Watkins' hometown, the state capital of Topeka. District Attorney Mike Kagay announced them less than half an hour before the three GOP candidates' only scheduled debate began on three stations.

The UPS postal box was listed as Watkins' residential address for voter registration purposes when he cast a mail-in ballot for a local city council and school board election in November 2019. He later changed his residential listing.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Giantone;1255372]republicains, got to love them....................

[url]https://www.yahoo.com/news/kansas-freshman-gop-rep-watkins-000957910.html[/url]

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A freshman Kansas congressman who had listed a UPS Inc. postal box as his residence on a state voter registration form was charged Tuesday with three felonies, including illegal voting.

The charges against GOP Rep. Steve Watkins came three weeks before the state's Aug. 4 primary election with fellow Republicans pushing to oust him from the eastern Kansas seat he barely won in 2018, even though he's largely toed the conservative policy line and supported President Donald Trump. GOP critics already had worried that the months-long investigation into whether Watkins violated state election laws puts the 2nd District seat in play if he wins the primary.

Watkins called the charges “hyper-political” even though the district attorney who filed them also is a Republican. The congressman said during a televised debate Tuesday evening that he hadn't seen the charges but has done nothing wrong.

“I'll get my name exonerated," he said during his closing statement.

The charges were filed in state district court in Shawnee County, which includes Watkins' hometown, the state capital of Topeka. District Attorney Mike Kagay announced them less than half an hour before the three GOP candidates' only scheduled debate began on three stations.

The UPS postal box was listed as Watkins' residential address for voter registration purposes when he cast a mail-in ballot for a local city council and school board election in November 2019. He later changed his residential listing.[/quote]

Sunny, I know you were kind of making a tongue in cheek example, but FoxNews did cover it. That's actually how I found out about it.

[url]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kansas-freshman-gop-rep-watkins-charged-3-felonies[/url]

In terms of what he did "wrong", simple mistake. Who doesn't think their house isn't at a delivery store from time to time. Many a time I woke up inside of a UPS Store. What a fucking idiot. If they can't just remove him outright, there is no way he would win anyways. He won't become a sophomore.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1255385]Sunny, I know you were kind of making a tongue in cheek example, but FoxNews did cover it. That's actually how I found out about it.

[url]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kansas-freshman-gop-rep-watkins-charged-3-felonies[/url]

In terms of what he did "wrong", simple mistake. Who doesn't think their house isn't at a delivery store from time to time. Many a time I woke up inside of a UPS Store. What a fucking idiot. If they can't just remove him outright, there is no way he would win anyways. He won't become a sophomore.[/quote]

With UPS stores on every corner, it's easy to see how they get confused for houses. We're on the same wavelength SD.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

The hypocrisy of "States rights".

------------

Federal agents in Portland, Ore., must confine their law enforcement duties to the protection of federal assets and wear uniforms that identify them, Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano told “Fox & Friends” on Tuesday.

“The federal government can use federal assets to protect federal property,” Napolitano said.

“Stated differently, the Department of Homeland Security can send police into Oregon to protect a federal courthouse in Oregon, use that as an example.”

He went on to say that the federal government cannot, however, enforce the general criminal law.

“They can't supplement or replace the police,” Napolitano explained. “They can't go throughout the streets and say, ‘Hey, you’re committing a crime. We’re going to arrest you.’”

“They certainly can't do what they have been doing in Oregon, which is arresting people without a warrant and without probable cause, holding them for a few hours and then letting them go,” he went on to explain. “So they have to be restrained and they have to confine their activity to the federal property.”

“Their law enforcement duties must absolutely be confined to the protection of federal assets, [B]so says the Constitution[/B], which leaves the general police power in the hands of the cities and states and not the federal government,” Napolitano said on Tuesday.

[url]https://www.foxnews.com/media/judge-napolitano-federal-agents-portland-constitution[/url]

---------------

I am sure all the "States Rights!!!!" conservatives are denouncing Trumps trampling of the Constitution.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

President Donald Trump and a top Homeland Security official on Monday defended the actions of federal forces in Portland, Oregon, and suggested the tactics could be repeated in other cities despite widespread charges from protesters and elected officials that the militarized response has been a violent abuse of federal power.

Federal agents in tactical gear have tear-gassed and bloodied protestors, and detained some off the streets using unmarked vehicles, according to local media, accounts from protesters and videos of the encounters.
[

READ: Racism Resonates as Public Health Crisis ]

State and local leaders have condemned the actions of the forces and asked the federal government to remove them, and the state's Department of Justice is suing several federal agencies for civil rights abuses. Prosecutors are also looking into pursuing criminal charges against a federal officer after a protester was seriously injured when he was shot in the head with what witnesses say was a less-than-lethal munition.

Federal officials say they are quelling unrest and defending federal property from "violent anarchists." They say protesters have graffitied property and thrown rocks and other projectiles at buildings and law enforcement.

[B]Trump on Monday praised the actions of the federal law enforcement members in the city, saying they have done a "fantastic job," and also implied that federal forces could be sent to other cities.[/B]

"We are going to have more federal law enforcement," Trump said, speaking from the Oval Office, after being asked by a reporter what he planned to do to address issues he says are rampant in cities led by Democratic leaders.

Trump called protesters in Portland "anarchists" who "hate our country," adding that the situation is "worse than Afghanistan."

Earlier Monday, Ken Cuccinelli, the acting No. 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, told CNN that the administration would "respond in the same way" in other places if authorities believed federal facilities were under threat.

The Chicago Tribune reported Monday that DHS plans to send about 150 personnel to Chicago this week, though it is not clear what role those federal agents will play.

DHS formed "rapid deployment teams" after Trump signed an executive order directing agencies to protect monuments and federal property amid national protests for racial justice sparked by the death of George Floyd, a Black man, in police custody in May. The deployment teams consist of officers from Customs and Border Protection, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Transportation Security Administration, and the Coast Guard, as well as the Federal Protective Service, which is already tasked with protecting federal property.

[url]https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2020-07-20/trump-praises-actions-of-federal-agents-in-portland-amid-widespread-condemnation[/url]

Federal law enforcement have a 100% right to defend federal property and Federal Courthouses. But these "agents" in unmarked mini vans are jumping out and arresting people far from Federal buildings.

These protests are getting old but we cant allow a Federal force to take action because its getting inconvenient or we disagree with it.

Imagine a Democrat president sending unmarked federal agents to detain (for no reason or PC) boogaloo or 3 percenters because of perceived threat.

I dont really agree with protests on day 54 but the constitution is clear on this.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Lol...these aren’t protesters, these are rioters trying to destroy and burn down federal buildings as well as attack police. This isn’t about the killing of George Floyd...we know that right?

protesters are not allowed to perform criminal acts, that is not allowed under the constitution. So if any alt right group performed the same act they should be met with violence...AS They have been in the past! These people should be met with the same force imo.

Theses aren’t peaceful protesters but traitors. The want the destruction of the US, they have said this...so traitors, right?

Listen to the first 30 seconds...July 17 2020: this tranny ugly bitch states it:

[YT]kfz4f-gCr9k[/YT]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

The Hill
@thehill
· 23h
#BREAKING: President Trump says he may send "more federal law enforcement" to New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Detroit, Baltimore, Oakland, and other cities to deal with unrest: "In Portland they’ve done a fantastic job."

--------------

I was in Baltimore this weekend ... it was normal, we went with gellato and these amazing almond cookies.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1256078]Lol...these aren’t protesters, these are rioters trying to destroy and burn down federal buildings as well as attack police. This isn’t about the killing of George Floyd...we know that right?

protesters are not allowed to perform criminal acts, that is not allowed under the constitution. So if any alt right group performed the same act they should be met with violence...AS They have been in the past! These people should be met with the same force imo.

Theses aren’t peaceful protesters but traitors. The want the destruction of the US, they have said this...so traitors, right?

Listen to the first 30 seconds...July 17 2020: this tranny ugly bitch states it:

[YT]kfz4f-gCr9k[/YT][/quote]

Chico - Yes, when it comes to federal buildings, they have a 100% right to protect Federal buildings.

The constitution does not allows federal agents to enforce local police laws away from Federal Buildings.

^^that is the issue.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=SunnySide;1256062]I am sure all the "States Rights!!!!" conservatives are denouncing Trumps trampling of the Constitution.[/quote]

I do not agree with Trump on this. This is not the federal government's job. If the federal government just followed the constitution, and specifically the 10th amendment, since well before and including the Trump administration, the national debt would be a whole lot less.

This is up to people in Portland and Oregon to resolve. If they want to let those losers destroy their city that is on them. That's who they elected. Either demand they fix it or vote some people in that have an ounce of common sense.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[IMG]https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/57051608.jpg[/IMG]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Jimbo;1256478]Same situation that Obama did to the American public. Think about it[/quote]

..............troll alert!:spam:

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[url]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/william-barr-is-a-disgrace-to-his-office-now-house-democrats-can-show-why/ar-BB17gkvQ?li=BBnbfcL[/url]

[quote=NBC News Op-ed]
A second pivotal step — though little noticed — was on Feb. 5, when Barr issued a memorandum to Justice Department officials setting down election-year rules for conducting politically related investigations and prosecutions. In this memo, Barr made fundamental changes to longstanding department policy. These changes allow Barr to issue a report on a criminal investigation or bring criminal indictments in late summer or fall to help Trump get re-elected.

Previously, Justice Department rules had long prevented it from taking actions in an election year that might affect voting results. Past attorneys general have laid out these rules in almost identical memos: in March 2008 by Attorney General Michael Mukasey, a Republican appointee, and in March 2012 by Attorney General Eric Holder and April 2016 by Attorney General Loretta Lynch, both Democratic appointees.

All these memos state that "politics must play no role in the decisions of federal investigators or prosecutors regarding any investigations or criminal charges." There is a clear purpose for this: to prevent the powers of the Justice Department from being misused to affect an election.
[/quote]

I wanted to make sure you get advance notice of Barr's plot Chico, so you can come up with a solid defense in time of the sham charges he's gonna bring to influence the election.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[url]https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/29553829/espn-investigation-finds-coaches-nba-china-academies-complained-player-abuse-lack-schooling[/url]

ESPN investigation finds coaches at NBA China academies complained of player abuse, lack of schooling

Holy fucking shit. Lol the NBA directly involved with slaves at their training facilities:

Most of the players who trained at the NBA's Xinjiang academy were Uighurs, but it was unclear to league employees who spoke with ESPN if any were impacted by the government crackdown.

After returning from Xinjiang last fall, Corbin Loubert, a strength coach who joined the NBA after stints at the IMG Academy in Florida and The Citadel, posted a CNN story on Twitter describing how the network's reporters faced surveillance and intimidation in Xinjiang.

"I spent the past year living in Xinjiang, and can confirm every word of this piece is true," Loubert tweeted. "One of the biggest challenges was not only the discrimination and harassment I faced," he added, "but turning a blind eye to the discrimination and harassment that the Uyghur people around me faced."

Loubert declined several interview requests from ESPN.


I’m done with the NBA, they are a fucking disgrace. Wonder what Woj thinks about this?

So current day slavery is problem, right? Not slavery from a couple hundred years ago, but slavery today...where piece of shit hypocrite athletes like lebrona James complains daily, actually works for two companies now involved in modern day slavery.

Lol...good god fuck China i wish to god we nuke that entire fucking country.

COVID, slavery, oppression...why are folks carrying their water?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Yeah, I agree with you on China Chico. I used to hate Lebron, which peaked right around the time of the decision. Then he started speaking his mind a little more and I started to respect him for using his platform to effect change worldwide.

Then the NBA China scandal happened and he basically turned a blind eye, and now I'm back to having little respect for him. The NBA is in a unique position because I'd say out of the big 4 it's probably the biggest American league in China, but they are definitely turning a blind eye to Chinese transgressions so they can keep making money.