Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=Mattyk;1062181]Morris, Helu, Sproles would be a nice RB group.[/quote]

It would be epic.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

I see no one wants to sign anyone, so lets just shell the same team out there next year.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=Paintrain;1062191]Gotta shake the 'all things shiny are bad' mentality to free agency. It's as ludicrous as the 'all things shiny are good' way we used to think as an organization.

If a player is a fit, improves the team and can be signed for a reasonable amount, smart teams make that move. Not specific to Sproles but free agency in general.[/quote]

To me this is where the Redskins need to leave no stone unturned in the draft and signing undrafted players, and developing players. With all of the numerous needs we simply can not pay a back up 30 year old rb and special teams player several million dollars.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1062201]I see no one wants to sign anyone, so lets just shell the same team out there next year.[/quote]

I just don't want to see the same old crap we always do cause that doesn't work. I'd almost wait for the first wave to go by. Let the Miami's of the world overpay and then try and find some solid bargains on that second round of signings.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1062203]To me this is where the Redskins need to leave no stone unturned in the draft and signing undrafted players, and developing players. With all of the numerous needs we simply can not pay a back up 30 year old rb and special teams player several million dollars.[/quote]

How much money do you think Sproles will get?

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1062205]How much money do you think Sproles will get?[/quote]

I don't know, maybe a couple million tops. If I were the Redskins he's not even on my radar. I don't make that signing at all.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1062204]I just don't want to see the same old crap we always do cause that doesn't work. I'd almost wait for the first wave to go by. Let the Miami's of the world overpay and then try and find some solid bargains on that second round of signings.[/quote]

Some FA signings have worked. I think Sporles at the right price is a bonus for this team.

A lot folks fears is just they don't understand the whole picture $$$ wise and how the cap works; so they think if we do X we can't do Y.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=skinsfan69;1062206]I don't know, maybe a couple million tops. If I were the Redskins he's not even on my radar. I don't make that signing at all.[/quote]

Why not he fills several holes(ST&RB Depth); you got pay someone why not him.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

To me Dri Archer is a better option that is younger, faster, and cheaper at this point than Sproles.

Sproles could be Randle el part 2.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

im torn on sproles. i would have liked to sign him before 2011 vs now but it seems like he got limited use last year so he should be fresh and it seems gruden places a high value on a catching rb.

cooley made the case for signing hester at a reas price and using him out of the backfield. he also sd hester provides a lot more value in the return game then just retunging kicks bc the opposing teams whole ST spends all week on directional kicking and doesnt have time to focus on other aspects.

i think id pass on hester though. and i apologize for starting every post with what cooley sd but im really liking what i hear from him.

side note - what does a 5 0 ("five ohh") call by the offense at the LOS pre-snap mean? jailbreak/hot read?

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

In regards to Sproles. Let's remember, it takes two to tango in FA. Think of it from Sproles' perspective. Why would he come to a team that has a young, talented, 3 down type back on the roster and no real hope of winning the Super Bowl in the near future. If I'm Sproles I'm looking for a few things.

1) A competitive team. Get another SB ring.
2) A team that will showcase me in the offense.
3) A team that will pay me.

He could potentially get #3 here, but that's it. I think it would be a mistake for both sides if we went after Sproles. Save that cash and put it towards locking up players for the future. He's nice to have. We already have a pretty nice backfield. I like what I saw from Helu last year and Morris played great again.

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[quote=Daseal;1062212]In regards to Sproles. Let's remember, it takes two to tango in FA. Think of it from Sproles' perspective. Why would he come to a team that has a young, talented, 3 down type back on the roster and no real hope of winning the Super Bowl in the near future. If I'm Sproles I'm looking for a few things.

1) A competitive team. Get another SB ring.
2) A team that will showcase me in the offense.
3) A team that will pay me.

He could potentially get #3 here, but that's it. I think it would be a mistake for both sides if we went after Sproles. Save that cash and put it towards locking up players for the future. He's nice to have. We already have a pretty nice backfield. I like what I saw from Helu last year and Morris played great again.[/quote]

What do you mean another SB ring?

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

From Sproles perspective he is not a running back in the traditional sense, so having a 2 down back on the roster doesn't matter. Redskins have a dynamic QB (when healthy), they are in a weak division, and are one year removed from being NFC East Champs. Can Gruden use Sproles like Payton did? If so it is a easy decision... yes to Washington

Based on ur logic Daseal, everyone would only play for Seattle, SF, Denver and the Patriots

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

[url=http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/10/49ers-to-cut-carlos-rogers/]49ers to cut Carlos Rogers | ProFootballTalk[/url]

Re: Current 2014 Free Agents
 

Alfmo's greatest weakness is catching passes. Sproles does this as a strength. Plus Sproles can return kicks.

That said, to sign Sproles is to sign the older and theoretically slower Sproles, not the Sproles of 2010. So I won't miss any sleep if we don't land Sproles.