![]() |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[quote=Chief X_Phackter;1263959]I'd rather them take their chances on a young QB in the 2021 draft.[/quote]
Me too. Again, I'm not recommending this trade as the best course of action. But if they were to do it, that is where I'd stand on what I would be agreeable with in terms of return compensation. I'd even be OK with not drafting a QB at all and getting someone like Sewell from Oregon and building up the rest of the roster. We can build a team and use Kyle as a placeholder for another season. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
Well, I think they will have to go QB one way or another. Hopefully the opportunity presents itself to get a young QB they really like in the draft. Kyle is on a 1-year contract, so you'll have to resign him if he's your placeholder for another year. We'll see how he fares the rest of the season, as to whether there would be much competition to do that.
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[QUOTE=MTK;1263958]Ok but why would they want Haskins?
I don't see Haskins having much trade value. I'm sure someone will give him a shot as a free agent, but in a trade especially to a team like the Jets that is going to be blowing up their coaching staff after the season? Again, makes zero sense.[/QUOTE] They don’t want Haskins, and they are giving up nothing except another bad quarterback. Haskins is just a more secure road to Trevor. It is just a tank move dressed up as a desperation move to right the ship. They don’t want to right the ship though. Darnold might actually win a game or two. Haskins actually makes them worse. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
Nobody tanks in the NFL, can we just stop with that baloney already.
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
Sure we can dress it up and call it evaluation....
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
Seahawks may be interested in Anderson and Hollister could be on his way out (cap casualty). Straight swap?
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[url]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/30235462/source-ryan-kerrigan-requested-trade-washington-football-team-deal-veteran-de%3fplatform=amp[/url]
Kerrigan wants out. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports Washington DE Ryan Kerrigan has requested a trade but Washington has told teams they won't be moving him. Kerrigan has only played on more than half of Washington's defensive snaps twice this year and the team only listed him as a starter once.
Wow so looks like we will mishandle this even with Rivera here. Things not changing folks. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1264033]ESPN's Adam Schefter reports Washington DE Ryan Kerrigan has requested a trade but Washington has told teams they won't be moving him. Kerrigan has only played on more than half of Washington's defensive snaps twice this year and the team only listed him as a starter once.
Wow so looks like we will mishandle this even with Rivera here. Things not changing folks.[/QUOTE]Why do you think this is being mishandled by the office? There were plenty of times where players requested to be traded but it never happened. Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
I don’t see why they won’t trade him
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[quote=skinsfaninok;1264037]I don’t see why they won’t trade him[/quote]
Idiots...should have traded him last year when Baltimore inquired. So looks like we will overpay him in an extension to a guy who shouldn’t get snaps in front of young or sweat. He terrible against the run. How do you know your terribly mismanaged organization? Take a look at your top paid players on the team: Alex Smith: terrible trade, worst contract: $21 cap hit for nothing, you get nothing from him. Without the injury he wouldn’t be playing folks, that’s just a fact. Good lock room guy, that how idiots rationalize Collins: 15 mil cap hit. Garbage, no impact position decision to pay a middle of road safety Schreff: 15 mil tag where intelligent organization with a plan extend quality players before you are forced to tag. Kerrigan: 11 mil cap hit for part time player. 11 mil for a part time is complete mismanagement as you renegotiate the cap number for a reasonable extension or cut him. He would be 0 cap hit if we would have...no ramification for the cap. A part time pass rusher is a 7-7.5 million at most per year contract, if you really had a plan it would be done. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[quote=Chico23231;1264038]Idiots...should have traded him last year when Baltimore inquired.
So looks like we will overpay him in an extension to a guy who shouldn’t get snaps in front of young or sweat. He terrible against the run. How do you know your terribly mismanaged organization? Take a look at your top paid players on the team: Alex Smith: terrible trade, worst contract: $21 cap hit for nothing, you get nothing from him. Without the injury he wouldn’t be playing folks, that’s just a fact. Good lock room guy, that how idiots rationalize Collins: 15 mil cap hit. Garbage, no impact position decision to pay a middle of road safety Schreff: 15 mil tag where intelligent organization with a plan extend quality players before you are forced to tag. Kerrigan: 11 mil cap hit for part time player. 11 mil for a part time is complete mismanagement as you renegotiate the cap number for a reasonable extension or cut him. He would be 0 cap hit if we would have...no ramification for the cap. A part time pass rusher is a 7-7.5 million at most per year contract, if you really had a plan it would be done.[/quote] To be fair, which of those contracts were put together since RR took over? |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
They should trade him. He has been great for this team. Since we are going with youth there is no reason not to trade him.... get what we can, unless the front office is saying that to try to get the best offer...
|
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
[quote=GridIron26;1264036]Why do you think this is being mishandled by the office? There were plenty of times where players requested to be traded but it never happened.
Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk[/quote] Agreed. Sweat and Young are better than him, at this point in all their respective careers. You can't just trade someone immediately every time they request it. And even if you're actually agreeable, you have to play the game, to maximize value. And earlier Kerrigan said he wanted to retire here. He's allowed to change his mind, but the team shouldn't give him away immediately. |
Re: Buyers, Sellers, Both, or Neither?
If Kerrigan requested it and there are people calling about him, at this point with his contract ending at the end of the year, I don't see why they dont trade him.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.