Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1 (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=35374)

MTK 02-26-2010 08:58 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=Trample the Elderly;666400]Honestly, what does Schefter know? When you get right down to it, he knows just about as much as you or I do. My tea leaves say no one knows. After the first two picks everything goes out the window.[/quote]

I'm going to guess he has a tad more inside info and connections than we do.

mredskins 02-26-2010 09:20 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
I would not mine seeing getting a great OT at 4 and then McCoy in the 2nd round.

mredskins 02-26-2010 09:35 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
nothing is for sure until the picks are made.

skinsfan69 02-26-2010 10:46 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=SmootSmack;666507]Of course it's still possible Campbell ends up being the guy. Redskins won't just give him away and they were talking contract extension with his agent back in November/December (talks which apparently are picking up again).

All that said though, my own gut feeling is there won't be a contract extension and Campbell will be traded before the draft[/quote]

Then who is going QB this team next year if what you say is true. Is Shanahan willing to just start a rookie when everyone wants to win now? Also does anyone know what they think about Clausen? I think if he's there at #4 then we should take him.

SmootSmack 02-26-2010 10:57 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=skinsfan69;666547]Then who is going QB this team next year if what you say is true. Is Shanahan willing to just start a rookie when everyone wants to win now? Also does anyone know what they think about Clausen? I think if he's there at #4 then we should take him.[/quote]

The people that have a "win now" mentality shouldn't be and aren't the ones making the key decisions

I like Clausen as a QB, I give Bradford the slight edge but if he's there at #4 I wouldn't be against drafting him...of course, the answer to all our problems is Jevan Snead!!!!! What!

Lotus 02-26-2010 11:17 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=skinsfan69;666547][B]Then who is going QB this team next year if what you say is true. Is Shanahan willing to just start a rookie when everyone wants to win now?[/B] Also does anyone know what they think about Clausen? I think if he's there at #4 then we should take him.[/quote]

I suppose we would draft a QB at #4, sign a vet like Pennington or Bulger, and see what happens from there.

mredskins 02-26-2010 11:23 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
What about Campbell and the 4th pick for the number one pick which turns into Bradford. I won't like it but just wondering what folks thought.

BigHairedAristocrat 02-26-2010 11:27 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=SmootSmack;666507]Of course it's still possible Campbell ends up being the guy. Redskins won't just give him away and they were talking contract extension with his agent back in November/December (talks which apparently are picking up again).

All that said though, my own gut feeling is there won't be a contract extension and Campbell will be traded before the draft[/quote]

Seems to me, the smart thing to do would be to give him a modest extension right now. something no more than 3 years with salaries no more than 4-5MM/year and 5MM in signing bonus money. If they decide to keep him, great.

but if they decide to trade him, having him under a contract like that should help us get more value out of him in a trade since 1) it would appear that we actually wanted him and 2) the new team wouldn't have to worry about negotiating a huge deal with him or fear that he could walk away after only one year.

MTK 02-26-2010 11:31 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;666560]Seems to me, the smart thing to do would be to give him a modest extension right now. something no more than 3 years with salaries no more than 4-5MM/year and 5MM in signing bonus money. If they decide to keep him, great.

but if they decide to trade him, having him under a contract like that should help us get more value out of him in a trade since 1) it would appear that we actually wanted him and 2) the new team wouldn't have to worry about negotiating a huge deal with him or fear that he could walk away after only one year.[/quote]

Exactly what I was thinking, something like a 3 year deal at $5M per. Look for a QB to groom in the later rounds. Address OL early.

Frost 02-26-2010 11:38 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=skinsfan69;666547]Then who is going QB this team next year if what you say is true. Is Shanahan willing to just start a rookie when everyone wants to win now? Also does anyone know what they think about Clausen? I think if he's there at #4 then we should take him.[/quote]

Jake Locker ... duuuuhhhh :cool-smil

Pocket$ $traight 02-26-2010 11:43 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=Lotus;666555]I suppose we would draft a QB at #4, sign a vet like Pennington or Bulger, and see what happens from there.[/quote]

What would make you think that Pennington and Bulger are better than Campbell? Hell, are they better than Todd Collins?

Pocket$ $traight 02-26-2010 11:43 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=mredskins;666558]What about Campbell and the 4th pick for the number one pick which turns into Bradford. I won't like it but just wondering what folks thought.[/quote]


If you want to win less than 4 games, sure...

SmootSmack 02-26-2010 11:48 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
My guess is that his agent will insist on a no-trade or limited-trade clause in any new deal

MTK 02-26-2010 11:54 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
From Chris Mortensen on Twitter:

I trust what I hear Dr. James Andrews is telling teams - Bradford's shoulder is on schedule & will be strong. [B]Brees' injury was much worse[/B].

Longtimefan 02-26-2010 11:58 AM

Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
 
[quote=SmootSmack;666550]The people that have a "win now" mentality shouldn't be and aren't the ones making the key decisions

I like Clausen as a QB, I give Bradford the slight edge but if he's there at #4 I wouldn't be against drafting him...of course, the answer to all our problems is Jevan Snead!!!!! What![/quote]

"The Future Is Now" was on every page in my season ticket renewal package I received by mail a couple of weeks ago. It's obvious that the future being now and winning now are two different things. It's not likely we'll win now with a rookie QB. Keep that bid going for Snead, just not in the first round. jk


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.11067 seconds with 9 queries