Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Redemption (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=63555)

NC_Skins 01-18-2016 09:36 PM

Re: Redemption
 
Sorry bro. We shot our wad getting into the playoffs and winning the division.

That Guy 01-18-2016 10:08 PM

Re: Redemption
 
grats to the panthers though, they look pretty serious.

Chico23231 01-18-2016 10:14 PM

Re: Redemption
 
I'm pulling for the winner in the nfc championship.....fuck Denver and the patriots

Giantone 01-19-2016 04:10 PM

Re: Redemption
 
[quote=coffee;1137965]You let me down!

I promised to beat Dallas. Well, we did, then just to be nice to you, we gave Romo the rest of the year off.

I promised to beat NY. Well, we did, and even gave OBJ another game off.

I completely live up to my end of the deal, then show up at the NFCCG and where are you!?! All you were supposed to do was be here and give us the win. Now we're gonna have to do this all on our own. Thanks a lot!

You do realize this means you will be expected to meet us in the NFCCG next year... and no excuses this time![/quote]

LOL, Luck always runs out ,tic-toc.

Giantone 01-19-2016 04:14 PM

Re: Redemption
 
[quote=Chico23231;1137977]I'm pulling for the winner in the nfc championship.....fuck Denver and the patriots[/quote]

I understand your feelings but as I have said from the start that inflate-gate BS was a way to knock Brady down and all it did was piss him off ,he's been a man on a mission since opening day .I wouldn't mind seeing Payton win one last one before he goes out so I'm in the AFC corner this super bowl.

30gut 01-19-2016 04:32 PM

Re: Redemption
 
My respect for Peyton and Brady is tempered by my dislike for how they've impacted the rules at the QB which imo has resulted in the watering down of QB position/stats.

Brady vs Raiders brought us the tuck rule then the when he tore up his knee it ushered in a halo of QB protection, Peyton brought the hands off approach to WRs after Bellitrix pushed the envelope of the bump and run coverage to an insane measure and when the Peyton and the Colts cried about it the comp committee signed on.

Skinzman 01-19-2016 05:39 PM

Re: Redemption
 
[quote=30gut;1138023]My respect for Peyton and Brady is tempered by my dislike for how they've impacted the rules at the QB which imo has resulted in the watering down of QB position/stats.

[B]Brady vs Raiders brought us the tuck rule[/B] then the when he tore up his knee it ushered in a halo of QB protection, Peyton brought the hands off approach to WRs after Bellitrix pushed the envelope of the bump and run coverage to an insane measure and when the Peyton and the Colts cried about it the comp committee signed on.[/quote]

Just to point out, the tuck rule was already in place. It was Brady vs Raiders that made the then unknown rule famous. It was the tuck rule that was cited as to why that wasnt a fumble in the first place. It wasnt just made up on the spot, it was already apart of the rule book prior to that game.

That Guy 01-19-2016 06:08 PM

Re: Redemption
 
[quote=30gut;1138023]My respect for Peyton and Brady is tempered by my dislike for how they've impacted the rules at the QB which imo has resulted in the watering down of QB position/stats.

Brady vs Raiders brought us the tuck rule then the when he tore up his knee it ushered in a halo of QB protection, Peyton brought the hands off approach to WRs after Bellitrix pushed the envelope of the bump and run coverage to an insane measure and when the Peyton and the Colts cried about it the comp committee signed on.[/quote]

pretty sure the cb rules were put in after carolina mugged WRs play after play the last time they made it to the superbowl. it was really ridiculous.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.49401 seconds with 9 queries