![]() |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=Schneed10;1356858]Because they were smart enough to keep swinging at the QB position. They took Lance in 2021 and took Purdy with a late pick in 2022.
Keep swinging at it until you're sure you've hit. We might take Williams or Maye but if we see someone we like in later rounds we should take them too. [B]Robert Griffin III gave rise to Kirk Cousins.[/B] Trey Lance gave rise to Brock Purdy. That's the model, keep swinging.[/quote] Kirk was picked because of Kyle; they obviously know what they are doing |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=skinsfan69;1356853]SF was able to withstand that massive miss. Down right awful draft pick. Just goes to show how fickle it is drafting QB's. Their 7th rounder ended up being better than the first rounder.[/quote]
This is what scares me about drafting a qb this year. You can do all the research and homework you want, but even the best ones fuck it up. Hopefully we don't miss. I also agree about keep swinging - the Cardinals were quick to move on from Rosen when it was clear he wasn't the guy. |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1356848]*whispers Trey Lance*[/quote]
To strengthen your argument, he also traded for CY But I still take him |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
So would I. and the CY move isn’t necessarily bad - for a team poised for a SB run, even small upgrades can make the difference and CY and Bosa on the edges is scary.
Whiffed on Trey Lance for sure but there no evaluator anywhere that wouldn’t be guilty of a big swing and miss. And as pointed out above, they’re still a favorite to get to the SB. They have depth on that roster everywhere. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
Speaking of Kirk, some teams should seriously consider going after him on a 2 or 3 year contract. Seattle is a team that has enough talent for him to make a big difference. Perhaps Atlanta, as well. I read that Tampa Bay is considering extending Baker Mayfield which I think would be a terrible move when they might be able to sign Kirk.
|
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=KI Skins Fan;1356875]Speaking of Kirk, some teams should seriously consider going after him on a 2 or 3 year contract. Seattle is a team that has enough talent for him to make a big difference. Perhaps Atlanta, as well. I read that Tampa Bay is considering extending Baker Mayfield which I think would be a terrible move when they might be able to sign Kirk.[/quote]
Bill Belichick as HC in Atlanta, bring in Kirk with Jay Gruden as OC...bam instant contender. |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
It’s down to Peters and Cunningham for President of Football operations per everyone
|
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=mredskins;1356868]To strengthen your argument, he also traded for CY
But I still take him[/quote] You know I was trolling. He’s my top guy too |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
Keim reported that we haven't shown any interest in Belchick, which is a relief for now..
|
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=Chico23231;1356877]It’s down to Peters and Cunningham for President of Football operations per everyone[/quote]
I thought they were both candidates for the GM position. If one of them becomes President of Football Ops, could that mean Martin Mayhew might keep his job as GM? |
Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1356883]I thought they were both candidates for the GM position. If one of them becomes President of Football Ops, could that mean Martin Mayhew might keep his job as GM?[/QUOTE]
I think whatever we call it that Peters or whoever will be in charge of personnel. Don’t think we will have a president and a gm. If we do the GM will basically be in charge of holding the door open for Peters… or whoever. John Lynch is the President/ GM in San Fran. |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[QUOTE=Chico23231;1356852]Pete Carroll, Saban and now Bill Belichick[/QUOTE]
You forgot Rivera….. |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
J P Finlay
[quote]Best news for Commanders fans? Both Cunningham and Peters have told other teams no. Not interested. Now theyre both in the running for the Washington job. Peters prob the favorite, but theyre both in it. They want this job. In DC. This is very different. This is good.[/quote] |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=punch it in;1356885]I think whatever we call it that Peters or whoever will be in charge of personnel. Don’t think we will have a president and a gm. If we do the GM will basically be in charge of holding the door open for Peters… or whoever.
John Lynch is the President/ GM in San Fran.[/quote] That is the way I see it as well. Head of Football Ops, President of Football Ops, GM...all going to be the same guy - and he will pick his HC. |
Re: Potential GM/HC/Coaches Thread
[quote=EdmundDorf;1356892]J P Finlay
Quote: Best news for Commanders fans? Both Cunningham and Peters have told other teams no. Not interested. Now theyre both in the running for the Washington job. Peters prob the favorite, but theyre both in it. They want this job. In DC. This is very different. This is good.[/quote] Honestly, this gives me chills. I am not sure I know how to handle people actually wanting to be a part of this organization. So refreshing and also just a bit twilight zoneish... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.