Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger? (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=27808)

saden1 01-11-2009 10:30 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=skinsfan69;519669]Baltimore got some real lucky breaks against Tenn and I think their corners are suspect. I don't think they beat Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh.[/quote]

Lucky? They forced 3 turnovers...I'm sure cheers of Ravens fans channeled all the luck in the universe and willed them to win.

Oh, when you have Ed Reed back there you corners can be suspect not that their corners are as suspect as you think.

The Goat 01-11-2009 10:37 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
How is it that SD couldn't get to Ben? Philly was all over him earlier in the season and even the lowly Redskins pass-rush got 4 sacks on him.

SFREDSKIN 01-11-2009 10:45 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=The Goat;519687]How is it that SD couldn't get to Ben? Philly was all over him earlier in the season and even the lowly Redskins pass-rush got 4 sacks on him.[/quote]

The Steelers have a decent OL, when the playoffs arrive is all about who's the hungriest team. Just look at the Cardinals, they stunk up the joint from Thanksgiving until the playoffs arrived.

SFREDSKIN 01-11-2009 10:51 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
This guy is a little over confident:

[url=http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=wojciechowski_gene&id=3825769&sportCat=nfl]Gene Wojciechowski examines Arizona's long-shot chances - ESPN[/url]

I hope the Cardinals kick their ASS!!

The Goat 01-11-2009 10:54 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
Probably just wishful thinking but I believe Ben is just a monster hit or two away from losing his effectiveness. I was just very surprised SD didn't target him especially after the serious concussion... Ray-Ray and the Ravens will do everything they can to put Ben on the turf.

GMScud 01-11-2009 10:55 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=Defensewins;519684]Your right it was not Joe Buck. It was who ever was partnered with Phil Simms during that game.?.?[/quote]

It was Jim Nantz.

rypper11 01-11-2009 11:02 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=Scott;519647]3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...[/quote]
3-0 against NFC championship teams
0-2 against AFC championship teams

In fact, 7-5 against NFC overall and 1-3 against AFC overall.
Maybe we could petition the NFL for no games against AFC?

SmootSmack 01-11-2009 11:06 PM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=The Goat;519693]Probably just wishful thinking but I believe Ben is just a monster hit or two away from losing his effectiveness. I was just very surprised SD didn't target him especially after the serious concussion... Ray-Ray and the Ravens will do everything they can to put Ben on the turf.[/quote]

Why do you wish that?

SouperMeister 01-12-2009 08:34 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=SFREDSKIN;519688]The Steelers have a decent OL, when the playoffs arrive is all about who's the hungriest team. Just look at the Cardinals, they stunk up the joint from Thanksgiving until the playoffs arrived.[/quote]Even more importantly, most of the playoff winners this post-season have been dictated by who got the steadier QB play. Eli was terrible yesterday, and Delhomme was categorically worse on Saturday.

Giantone 01-12-2009 09:31 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=Scott;519647]3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...[/quote]


Were those teams any good when you played them?

44Deezel 01-12-2009 09:34 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=Paintrain;519619]Since we beat both NFC Championship teams does that mean

A. It's a good sign meaning we're right there with the best in the conference?

B. It's a bad sign meaning we may have as much talent to play with those teams but for some reason we're still not good enough to consistently compete?

C. It's a sign of danger because the front office will think that we're [b][i]this close[/b][/i] to being a Super Bowl team.

What do you think?[/quote]

It means the Bengals think they're going to the playoffs next year, because they tied and Eagles and beat the team that swept the Eagles AND Cardinals;)

The Eagles and Cardinals lost to everybody. It goes to show that missing the playoffs because of losses to the Rams, Bengals and 49ers is inexcusable. Anything can happen in the playoffs. Just gotta get in!

Giantone 01-12-2009 09:34 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=rypper11;519698]3-0 against NFC championship teams
0-2 against AFC championship teams

In fact, 7-5 against NFC overall and 1-3 against AFC overall.
Maybe we could petition the NFL for no games against AFC?[/quote]

But the Giants swept you ?Untill someone else wins it the Giants are still the NFC Champions.

ridgely 01-12-2009 09:56 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
It's bad. I still remember Snyder on tv screaming in the bowels of the Linc about beating Dallas,Philly! Yeah! on the road. He's an idiot.

44ever 01-12-2009 10:04 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=44Deezel;519737]It means the Bengals think they're going to the playoffs next year, because they tied and Eagles and beat the team that swept the Eagles AND Cardinals;)

The Eagles and Cardinals lost to everybody. It goes to show that missing the playoffs because of losses to the Rams, Bengals and 49ers is inexcusable. Anything can happen in the playoffs. Just gotta get in![/quote]

Good point on the Bengals 44Deez. We sweept the Eagles because Westbrook wasn't 100% the 2nd game. McNabb was also his twin brother.

I'd like to add we had the potential to beat any team in the NFL the first half of the season including the Giants which we played well. Unfortunatly we had them first game of the season coming of there SB.

Bottom line, the teams that come on late in the season win in the playoffs. We did it backwards as usual. No way could we compete in the playoffs at this point. But we do have the potential.

TheMalcolmConnection 01-12-2009 10:08 AM

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 
[quote=Giantone;519636]Yup , the Eagles beat the Giants today now the #1,2,and 3 seed of the NFC are all out which bows well fro the AFC.We were out played but more important we were out coached today AR beat Coughlin all the way around the board.I'll be rooting for the Steelers becuase McNabb is so classless I just can't root for him.:)[/quote]

I wouldn't even say you were outplayed. It seems like this past few weeks that the Eagles have caught teams on their worst games of the season. I swear the Cardinals better freaking take it to them.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.22858 seconds with 9 queries