Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sizing up the NFC (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=21643)

MTK 12-29-2007 12:31 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=The Zimmermans;398539]Green Bay is not who we want to play in the playoffs, especially in Lambeau, [B]we aren't a cold weather team[/B], we proved that by the way our skill players played up there in the regular season. However, I would like our chances more so in Dallas, where the rivalry aspect of the game would give us a shot. So I'd say Green Bay with HOF Brett Favre is the last team we want to play.[/quote]

So are we a warm weather team??

Teams that run the ball well and play D can play in just about any weather.

railcon56 12-29-2007 12:57 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=chrisl4064;398257]I just keep going back to the origional posters first sentence. Lets just beat the cowboys![/quote]
AMEN brother!

Skinsfanmania 12-29-2007 02:15 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=Giantone;398437]Does that stuff come in 6 packs?:doh:[/quote]

no, it has to be rolled.

prinzeofmoval 12-29-2007 03:03 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[QUOTE=SFREDSKIN;398233]If we don't lose anymore key players to injury and make the playoffs we can play with any of them and beat them. Our intangible is our coaching staff. We had GB and Dallas on the ropes, we beat ourself s in those games.[/QUOTE]


yeah if we get in i fear none of those teams.we beat ourselves vs tampa,dallas,giants and green bay

Giantone 12-29-2007 03:32 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=Schneed10;398443]Who's got a better shot, the Giants or the Skins?

I rest my case.[/quote]



You need to prove it before you rest it.:spank:

Giantone 12-29-2007 03:33 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=Skinsfanmania;398559]no, it has to be rolled.[/quote]


LOL............what ever it takes.

Schneed10 12-29-2007 03:33 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=skinsfan69;398532][B]In order for us to get to the SB we would have to win 3 straight road games in the playoffs. The odds are just too stacked against us[/B]. I honestly don't see us going to Seattle and beating them at home. I'm not sold on Seattle cause they lost to Carolina so that game is winable. But it's going to be tough cause they are real real tough to beat at home.[/quote]

That's exactly why I made the point that only one team has made it to the Super Bowl with a 9-7 record, and no team has won it. Three in a row on the road will indeed be tough.

Seattle has been good at home, but they haven't really been tested much. I think it'd be a pretty even matchup.

Schneed10 12-29-2007 03:34 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=Giantone;398585]You need to prove it before you rest it.:spank:[/quote]

Did 22-10 in your house not do it for you?

724Skinsfan 12-29-2007 04:35 PM

Re: Sizing up the NFC
 
[quote=Schneed10;398587]That's exactly why I made the point that only one team has made it to the Super Bowl with a 9-7 record, and no team has won it. Three in a row on the road will indeed be tough.

Seattle has been good at home, but they haven't really been tested much. I think it'd be a pretty even matchup.[/quote]

Today, I don't feel a team's record is truly reflective of their "power". Today's 13-3 Dallas and Green Bay teams would lose to any of the 80's greats as well their own 90's counterparts. Tampa and Seattle both could've lost a couple more games this year if they had half the misfortune that we did. Our 9-7 record is not indicative of our team's skill level or balance. We can run, pass and defend both as well. Our special teams are solid. We lost the turnover/injury battle this year which reflects heavily on our regular season. We're not turning the ball over, nor our we hampered by as many injuries.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.13815 seconds with 9 queries