Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

I was curious about poor mr. trudeau's country, so I googled it, cuz that's what you do right.

[quote]Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said military spending will grow 70 percent to reach CAN$32.7 billion (U.S. $24.3 billion) in a decade. That means Canada would spend about 1.4 percent of gross domestic product on defense by 2026-2027, up from about 1.2 percent now.Jun 7, 2017
Canada to increase military spending 70 percent in 10 years

[url]www.defensenews.com/.../canada-to-increase-military-spending-70-percent-in-10-years/[/url][/quote]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=dmek25;1182807]wanting roy moore elected, while wanting frankken to resign?[/QUOTE]



Ding ding ding. We have a winner. Every other post is going to suck after this one. Lol

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1182877]There is way too much hypocrisy in all walks of life to narrow it to one political agenda, or point of view. The biggest problem of hypocrisy is that the hypocrit of any particular subject can't see his/her hypocrisy likely until it's way in hindsight IF ever.



That said, I will acknowledge I am a hypocrit when it comes to Trump's agenda versus the idiocy that is Trump. In my opinion, this country's future is at stake when it comes to agendas of Sanders/Clinton/Swamp republicans, so I will condemn them in anyway I can, while supporting Trump's agenda. and yes that is the definition of hypocrisy. C'EST LA GUERRE[/QUOTE]



WTF you could have said this months ago in the When is enough enough thread and saved me hours of my time. Hahahaha.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

The absolute illegal, ridiculous, dumbass shit I did as a teenager vs what I expect from my daughter who is about to become one. [emoji10]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=punch it in;1195682]The absolute illegal, ridiculous, dumbass shit I did as a teenager vs what I expect from my daughter who is about to become one. [emoji10][/quote]

Nothing as scary as a teenage girl between the ages of 14 and 18 ,they will make you fight ,scream ,drink ,swear,.....drink and all that while trying to get them to school on time. I went through it three times!!!All I can say is time heals all wounds and it does pass.:food-smil

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=Giantone;1195689]Nothing as scary as a teenage girl between the ages of 14 and 18 ,they will make you fight ,scream ,drink ,swear,.....drink and all that while trying to get them to school on time. I went through it three times!!!All I can say is time heals all wounds and it does pass.:food-smil[/QUOTE]



Yeah if I had a son I wouldn’t be half as worried. Ill literally be tailing her with a fake mustache in a borrowed car for the entire time.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=punch it in;1195681]WTF you could have said this months ago in the When is enough enough thread and saved me hours of my time. Hahahaha.[/quote]

:lol::headbanger::lol:

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[url]https://www.thedailybeast.com/once-shocked-by-obamas-latte-salute-hannity-ignores-trump-saluting-north-korean-general[/url]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=MTK;1195702][url]https://www.thedailybeast.com/once-shocked-by-obamas-latte-salute-hannity-ignores-trump-saluting-north-korean-general[/url][/quote]

Yup was waiting this...like Chris Rock said, that train is never late. It was foolish imo...now if trump woulda gone for fake salute then in for a nut punch...I coulda respected that.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=punch it in;1195692]Yeah if I had a son I wouldn’t be half as worried. Ill literally be tailing her with a fake mustache in a borrowed car for the entire time.[/QUOTE]I agree on the daughter part, mine turns 18 in 2 weeks.

But you dont know true hypocrisy without a teenage son. Everytime mine did something stupid that I, as the parent and responsible adult figure, would call him out and/or discipline him even while privately remembering the times i did the exact same dumb ass stuff. [emoji23][emoji23]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1195711]I agree on the daughter part, mine turns 18 in 2 weeks.

But you dont know true hypocrisy without a teenage son. Everytime mine did something stupid that I, as the parent and responsible adult figure, would call him out and/or discipline him even while privately remembering the times i did the exact same dumb ass stuff. [emoji23][emoji23][/quote]

Yeah , God has a sense of humor that way!;)

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1195711]I agree on the daughter part, mine turns 18 in 2 weeks.

But you dont know true hypocrisy without a teenage son. Everytime mine did something stupid that I, as the parent and responsible adult figure, would call him out and/or discipline him even while privately remembering the times i did the exact same dumb ass stuff. [emoji23][emoji23][/QUOTE]



Lol. I actually have a 24 year old step son. My wife was married and had a child pretty much when she started her teaching career. I came into the picture when he was 11. So I did - use to lecture and punish him all the time when he was a teenager and be thinking “wow you dont even know how to party.” Hahaha. I have said to friends with younger children “hey its a parents job to be a hypocrite “ so many times. Im so nervous about my daughters teenager years it aint even funny C Red.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

here are some ideas for ya
[IMG]https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71AHXtBneFL._SL1500_.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://balancedwithallie.com/img/father-against-daughter-dating.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.12097317.5310/fc,550x550,black.jpg[/IMG]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1195725]here are some ideas for ya
[IMG]https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71AHXtBneFL._SL1500_.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://balancedwithallie.com/img/father-against-daughter-dating.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.12097317.5310/fc,550x550,black.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

LOL, I will show those to my grandson's!!!

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1195725]here are some ideas for ya

[IMG]https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71AHXtBneFL._SL1500_.jpg[/IMG]



[IMG]http://balancedwithallie.com/img/father-against-daughter-dating.jpg[/IMG]



[IMG]https://ih1.redbubble.net/image.12097317.5310/fc,550x550,black.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]



[emoji23]
And yes Chico the first one triggered me a bit.....

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE]Chuck Schumer
✔
@SenSchumer
· 6h
Replying to @SenSchumer
If POTUS leaves Putin mtg w/out ironclad assurances & concrete steps toward a full cessation of Russian attacks on the US, this mtg will not only be a failure, it will be a grave step back for the future of intl order & global security. A successful mtg means real action, now.[/QUOTE]

Man, I am so hoping Trump "whispers" to Putin in front of the cameras "[URL="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-more-flexibility-russia/"] After the election I have more flexibility [/URL]"

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1196440]Man, I am so hoping Trump "whispers" to Putin in front of the cameras "[URL="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-more-flexibility-russia/"] After the election I have more flexibility [/URL]"[/quote]
Why would he, putin is running the country now.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1196440]Man, I am so hoping Trump "whispers" to Putin in front of the cameras "[URL="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-more-flexibility-russia/"] After the election I have more flexibility [/URL]"[/quote]

Don't count your chickens yet................,Nunes is running from something....what could it be?



[url]http://thehill.com/homenews/house/396632-nunes-leaves-in-middle-of-hearing-dodges-questions-on-russia-probe[/url]

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Giantone;1196467]Don't count your chickens yet................,Nunes is running from something....what could it be?



[url]http://thehill.com/homenews/house/396632-nunes-leaves-in-middle-of-hearing-dodges-questions-on-russia-probe[/url][/quote]

Give the man a break, being Trump's lapdog isn't easy.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=mooby;1196469]Give the man a break, being Trump's lapdog isn't easy.[/quote]

LOL, I thought that was Rudy?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Giantone;1196479]LOL, I thought that was Rudy?[/quote]

This is the guy who has been most surprising. What the heck happened to Rudy, he really sounds like a fool. He used to be one of the most respectable old skool guys around....to see him paraded around sounding like an idiot...very sad.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1196480]This is the guy who has been most surprising. What the heck happened to Rudy, he really sounds like a fool. He used to be one of the most respectable old skool guys around....to see him paraded around sounding like an idiot...very sad.[/quote]

We agree on this. Every time he talks, I expect him to slip something that contradicts what Trump is saying.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Latest hypocrisy:

Amazing how the FBI went from steaming pile of deep state dog shit in Trump's opinion to "well the pros did another thorough investigation on Kavanaugh and didn't find anything. We fully back Kavanaugh."

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=mooby;1201836]Latest hypocrisy:

Amazing how the FBI went from steaming pile of deep state dog shit in Trump's opinion to "well the pros did another thorough investigation on Kavanaugh and didn't find anything. We fully back Kavanaugh."[/quote]..........................funny how shit like that happens.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

As I said before I don't like the guy and I like him less now. Yet that last minute BS was just that BS. If any good comes from it people will remember this in November and vote the republicans out and shut trump down.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201836]Latest hypocrisy:

Amazing how the FBI went from steaming pile of deep state dog shit in Trump's opinion to "well the pros did another thorough investigation on Kavanaugh and didn't find anything. We fully back Kavanaugh."[/QUOTE]Its really not hypocritical. If you believe that the fbi higher ups had it in for trump, its equally believable that if they could have humiliated trump by proving any level of credibility to the professors accusation then they would have found it, leaked it, and embarassed trump with it. The fact that they didn't or couldn't or wouldn't with the immense resources re-emphasiszes Stzock's catch phrase, there's no there there.

In addition those who feel the gang of antitrumpers that abused the fbi's integrity have also consistently expressed strong support for the men and women of the fbi.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201836]Latest hypocrisy:

Amazing how the FBI went from steaming pile of deep state dog shit in Trump's opinion to "well the pros did another thorough investigation on Kavanaugh and didn't find anything. We fully back Kavanaugh."[/QUOTE]And really Isnt it more hypocritical for the dems to corner flake and get him to agree to request a 1week delay then turn around and complain about the fbi's process?

It sounds like they interviewed everybody with firsthand knowledge, and nothing corroborated it. Everything else that i have heard reported was hearsay testimony, fbi doesnt chase hearsay.

Pelosi is now calling for the release of the fbi findings. I think they should and hope they do

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1201892]And really Isnt it more hypocritical for the dems to corner flake and get him to agree to request a 1week delay then turn around and complain about the fbi's process?

It sounds like they interviewed everybody with firsthand knowledge, and nothing corroborated it. Everything else that i have heard reported was hearsay testimony, fbi doesnt chase hearsay.

Pelosi is now calling for the release of the fbi findings. I think they should and hope they do[/quote]

Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=mooby;1201901]Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?[/quote]

no and from my understanding not many of the classmates .

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

The fbi didn’t find the result we wanted so fuck’m

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201901]Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?[/QUOTE]Both were questioned publicly by the judiciary committee, and provided a full written testimony. Are you suggesting that Dr. Ford withheld important details from the Judiciary Committee? That would not bode well for her credibility would it?

Again the hypocrisy of the left is far more on display, the fbi could most certainly have chosen to interview Kavanaugh or Ford if they felt they needed additional information, or if additional information prompted additional questions, but since the left doesnt like the result they scream the fbi was bad, even they have spent the last 2 years saying how thorough independent and professional the fbi under Christopher wray is.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201901]Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?[/QUOTE]In regards to Kavanaugh any good innvestigator would interview all the expected eyewitnesses and then requestion Kavanaugh with any developed questions.

Assuming all the primary witnesses did not change their testimony or fall apart under questioning, what would you expect Kavanaugh to say - ok fbi since you asked me, i did it i lied on tv but i can tell you guys in confidence right?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1201907]Both were questioned publicly by the judiciary committee, and provided a full written testimony. Are you suggesting that Dr. Ford withheld important details from the Judiciary Committee? That would not bode well for her credibility would it?

Again the hypocrisy of the left is far more on display, the fbi could most certainly have chosen to interview Kavanaugh or Ford if they felt they needed additional information, or if additional information prompted additional questions, but since the left doesnt like the result they scream the fbi was bad, even they have spent the last 2 years saying how thorough independent and professional the fbi under Christopher wray is.[/quote]

U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly [URL="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house-blocking-fbi-from-interviewing-brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-report"]seems to think so[/URL].

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=mooby;1201901]Did the FBI interview Ford or Kavanaugh?[/quote]

I love how you get a straight answer from the trump right.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=Chico23231;1201906]The fbi didn’t find the result we wanted so fuck’m[/quote]

Isn't that what trump said when the FBI investigated Hillary?:D

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201911]U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly [URL="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house-blocking-fbi-from-interviewing-brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-report"]seems to think so[/URL].[/QUOTE]Again, its the left who wanted an fbi investigation and now cries after the fbi (which is no friend of this white house and would leak a turnip if they thought it hurts trump) found nothing.

If judge or her friend had said anything at all that corroborated it flake manchin collins and especially mikursky would have highlighted it as a reason for voting no.

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201911]U right, Senate Judiciary Committee is just as qualified to investigate potential criminal matters as the FBI.

Is it true the FBI had to get permission from the WH as to who they could interview? Idk, but this liberal rag called the Washington Examiner certainly [URL="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house-blocking-fbi-from-interviewing-brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-report"]seems to think so[/URL].[/QUOTE]Also, again are you saying that doctor ford purposely withheld information from the judiciary committee? Or maybe that her lawyers did so they could use the fbi?(i actually might believe that scenario, but again if they purposefully withheld information wouldnt that be obstruction?)

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1201919]Also, again are you saying that doctor ford purposely withheld information from the judiciary committee? Or maybe that her lawyers did so they could use the fbi?(i actually might believe that scenario, but again if they purposefully withheld information wouldnt that be obstruction?)[/quote]

I'm not saying Ford did anything, because I'm not her.

Phrasing should help. We wanted an open FBI investigation, which means the FBI doesn't have to ask WH permission to do their jobs.

But if I was Dr. Ford, who would I rather investigate the matter? The clearly pro-Kavanaugh Judiciary committee or the FBI?

Let's be honest Cred. The whole thing was a sham because the committee already knew which way they were voting unless of course there was indisputable evidence of transgressions. Which there wasn't.

Who in their right mind thought Kavanaugh's close buddies would back up what Ford was saying?

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

[QUOTE=mooby;1201920]I'm not saying Ford did anything, because I'm not her.

Phrasing should help. We wanted an open FBI investigation, which means the FBI doesn't have to ask WH permission to do their jobs.

But if I was Dr. Ford, who would I rather investigate the matter? The clearly pro-Kavanaugh Judiciary committee or the FBI?

Let's be honest Cred. The whole thing was a sham because the committee already knew which way they were voting unless of course there was indisputable evidence of transgressions. Which there wasn't.

Who in their right mind thought Kavanaugh's close buddies would back up what Ford was saying?[/QUOTE]I agree the whole thing was a sham but i also believe if her friend had in any way at all corroborated her story, even just as simple as saying she went to a party like that with dr ford the nomination would have died. When her self described close friend refused to support any of the accusation i think the whole episode was doomed

Re: The hypocrisy of the ________
 

Innocent until proven guilty. Probably the # 1 greatest thing about our country. Do guilty people get away with stuff, yep, it happens. Is that better than the alternative, yes it is, and its not close. I really hope we stay in this amazing country where this stays true.