Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Sheriff Gonna Getcha;280730]I don't think you can make the above statement in good-faith. Supposing that Calvin Johnson is the next Jerry Rice, would you still stand by the above statements?

There's no doubt a DT is worth more to OUR team than a WR, but that's not going to be true for a team with a good D-line and a poor WR-corps. Take San Diego as an example. If they had to choose between a DT, DE, or WR with a top 5 pick, they'd be crazy not to spend it on the WR of CJ's caliber.[/quote]If Calvin Johnson was the next Jerry Rice, it would justify a top 5 selection. If he ends up being the next Joey Galloway, a very real possibility, it becomes a wasted selection.

My point is that the next Jerry Rice is not nearly as valuable as the next Reggie White, Joe Montana, LaDainian Tomlinson, Bruce Matthews, Walter Jones, or Darrell Green. Assuming that each player has an equal chance to become the greatest ever at his position, it would be better to take a shot on either line or in either backfield than at the WR position.

As far as teams drafting for need...one would think that every team in the league as a need more pressing than WR. Any team that picks Johnson in the top 10 is taking a big risk knowing that the possible return on their investment will not be as great as another position. His selectior must realize that he must be everything his scouting report promises to justify his selection. I don't believe this is true with any other position.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

trade down please need to get extra picks

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=GTripp0012;280717]I never said anything about "making the safe pick". I was talking purely about positional value. For wide receivers, there is NO benefit to taking one in the top 10 as opposed to between 11-20. None. On top of this, the positional value of a WR is lower than any other player on the offense, and arguably all of the defense also. It's the only position on the field that will be a realtive non factor on more than 1/3 of offensive plays.

Calvin Johnson is (presumably) a far better receiver than Randle El or Lloyd. But are we a better offense with Johnson starting instead of Randle El. Yes, but only by a very very slim margin. There just isn't much significance in the position.

Conversely, if we were to replace Saleve'a with Branch (assuming of course that Branch will be a dominant player just as we presumed Johnson would be), the defense will be SIGNIFICANTLY stronger vs the run. The team would be much better off.

That's positional value. I don't think any position is "safer" than another position. I think that (4 year starting) seniors are always safer picks than underclassmen, simply because there is so much film on them. If a senior has bust potential, surely there will be red flags that scouts will find. If an underclassman has bust potential, there might not be adequate film on him, and some red flags may sneak beneath the scouts observations. I don't think Larry Fitzgerald was a safe pick though. He came out of school early, and thats never a "safe" thing. I remember him being regarded as the "best player in college football," and he was the 3rd pick--so don't say he wasn't highly regarded.[/quote]

first, adding 800 more yards in passing offense, and another 100 running offense (cause he blocks much better than any WR we have) is a huge improvement. Maybe as much so as the couple hundred fewer yards branch would prevent. Just cause you think you can arbitrarily assign positional values on complete unknowns doesn't make it fact :P

and there is benefit in taking a WR in the top 10 if he'd be gone by pick 12 or 13 and ends up in the HoF. so saying there's no benefit is just crap. fitz was a fairly safe pick, and i didn't say he wasn't highly regarded, i said he wasn't as highly regarded as CJ on draft day.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=GTripp0012;280739]If Calvin Johnson was the next Jerry Rice, it would justify a top 5 selection. If he ends up being the next Joey Galloway, a very real possibility, it becomes a wasted selection.

My point is that the next Jerry Rice is not nearly as valuable as the next Reggie White, Joe Montana, LaDainian Tomlinson, Bruce Matthews, Walter Jones, or Darrell Green. Assuming that each player has an equal chance to become the greatest ever at his position, it would be better to take a shot on either line or in either backfield than at the WR position.

As far as teams drafting for need...one would think that every team in the league as a need more pressing than WR. Any team that picks Johnson in the top 10 is taking a big risk knowing that the possible return on their investment will not be as great as another position. His selectior must realize that he must be everything his scouting report promises to justify his selection. I don't believe this is true with any other position.[/quote]

again, you have any "proof" of this, or are you just making it up? a great QB always excedes everything else, but after that, it really depends on the situation. if you have a solid CB core and no WRs, rice is going to improve your team a lot more than darrell green might. such blanket statements are really pretty silly.

I mean, look how well minnesota did with no WRs. but they had a good OL and defense, so i guess it didn't matter, right? and you saw how much donte stallworth or TO improved the eagles offense when they were in the game. #1 WRs absolutely DO matter. the depth isn't really as important.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

Sorry boy's but if CJ somehow falls to us we have to take him, we deal all the great WR's we aquired last year teams should be lineing up for them.

Branch looked out of shape at the combine, which would coincide with his lazyness, I wonder if he will be any more motivated after he becomes a millionair?

I really haven't any seen any film on Adams, or Anderson, but rest assured none of them will be near the player that CJ will be.

It's nice Adams want's to be a Skin, he must have heard the Texans were gearing up to draft him.

I think the only player that really makes sense on the defensive line may be Anderson, he has the size to stop the strong side run and can get after the QB, Adams should be a RT end, we cannot put Carter on the strong side he can't hold his ground, and Branch looks like he may be the second coming of BIG DADDY WILK.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=That Guy;280795]first, adding 800 more yards in passing offense, and another 100 running offense (cause he blocks much better than any WR we have) is a huge improvement. Maybe as much so as the couple hundred fewer yards branch would prevent. Just cause you think you can arbitrarily assign positional values on complete unknowns doesn't make it fact :P

and there is benefit in taking a WR in the top 10 if he'd be gone by pick 12 or 13 and ends up in the HoF. so saying there's no benefit is just crap. fitz was a fairly safe pick, and i didn't say he wasn't highly regarded, i said he wasn't as highly regarded as CJ on draft day.[/quote]Those 800/100 figures seem pretty arbitrary. The 2nd receiver got thrown at about 45 times this year. I highly doubt that CJ or anyone else can change 45 passes (about 40 receptions if he's really good) into 800 yards (~20 yards/reception). That's pretty preposterous. Realistically he might add another 75-125 yards to the passing offense over the ARE/Lloyd combo over the course of an entire season. Marginal.

Randle El had 32 receptions for 351 yards (11 yards/reception). Are you saying that Calvin Johnson could have gone for 1150 yards in a similar amount of oppertunities?

Maybe he creates a few more yards than Randle El does in the running game...but 100? Is he some sort of lineman out there who takes multiple players out of every play? Randle El isn't a crappy blocker and already does a good job taking the corner out on front side plays. But you honestly think that CJ would create 100 more rushing yards (Not to mention that ARE had over 100 yards rushing last year)?

[quote=That Guy;280798]again, you have any "proof" of this, or are you just making it up? a great QB always excedes everything else, but after that, it really depends on the situation. if you have a solid CB core and no WRs, rice is going to improve your team a lot more than darrell green might. such blanket statements are really pretty silly.

I mean, look how well minnesota did with no WRs. but they had a good OL and defense, so i guess it didn't matter, right? and you saw how much donte stallworth or TO improved the eagles offense when they were in the game. #1 WRs absolutely DO matter. the depth isn't really as important.[/quote]Minnesota's offense sucked because Brad Johnson had a horrible year, and because Chester Taylor didn't come through when they needed it (no running game+no passing game despite the quality of the O Line which had an underachieving right side). Phili and NE have skimped on the WRs for years and have made top 10 offenses. Look what KC had done for many years.

Having a Santana Moss is a big deal. The guy can turn a simple screen into a 80 yard touchdown. That's a rare ability, and [I]most top WRs in this league don't have that ability.[/I]

I think you are misunderstanding my point though. If a team has a great CB core and a weak WR core, they probably shouldn't be drafting someone in the hopes of being the next Darrell Green. However, they probably have much bigger needs than WR. Maybe they should be looking for the next Orlando Pace or Warren Sapp as opposed to the next Rice.

Common sense says that the 9 players who have the biggest effect on the offense are the guys closest to the football. If they all do their jobs to ultimate perfection, playing WR in this league is going to be pretty damn easy :P

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

is it me or does Alan branch have an eierry simularity to Big Daddy Wilkinson

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[QUOTE=diehardskin2982;280911]is it me or does Alan branch have an eierry simularity to Big Daddy Wilkinson[/QUOTE]

Plus I know I spelled name wrong

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[QUOTE=diehardskin2982;280911]is it me or does Alan branch have an eierry simularity to Big Daddy Wilkinson[/QUOTE]

In what way? Is it because they're both big defensive tackles?

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Beemnseven;280935]In what way? Is it because they're both big defensive tackles?[/quote]

I can see it, the knock on Big Daddy was that he played lazy at times. The knock on Adams is that he takes plays off at times and isn't known as a high motor guy.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

I just remember being all hyped up to take Big Daddy and he ended up being mediocre

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=GTripp0012;280845]Those 800/100 figures seem pretty arbitrary. The 2nd receiver got thrown at about 45 times this year. I highly doubt that CJ or anyone else can change 45 passes (about 40 receptions if he's really good) into 800 yards (~20 yards/reception). That's pretty preposterous. Realistically he might add another 75-125 yards to the passing offense over the ARE/Lloyd combo over the course of an entire season. Marginal.

Randle El had 32 receptions for 351 yards (11 yards/reception). Are you saying that Calvin Johnson could have gone for 1150 yards in a similar amount of oppertunities?

Maybe he creates a few more yards than Randle El does in the running game...but 100? Is he some sort of lineman out there who takes multiple players out of every play? Randle El isn't a crappy blocker and already does a good job taking the corner out on front side plays. But you honestly think that CJ would create 100 more rushing yards (Not to mention that ARE had over 100 yards rushing last year)?

Minnesota's offense sucked because Brad Johnson had a horrible year, and because Chester Taylor didn't come through when they needed it (no running game+no passing game despite the quality of the O Line which had an underachieving right side). Phili and NE have skimped on the WRs for years and have made top 10 offenses. Look what KC had done for many years.

Having a Santana Moss is a big deal. The guy can turn a simple screen into a 80 yard touchdown. That's a rare ability, and [I]most top WRs in this league don't have that ability.[/I]

I think you are misunderstanding my point though. If a team has a great CB core and a weak WR core, they probably shouldn't be drafting someone in the hopes of being the next Darrell Green. However, they probably have much bigger needs than WR. Maybe they should be looking for the next Orlando Pace or Warren Sapp as opposed to the next Rice.

Common sense says that the 9 players who have the biggest effect on the offense are the guys closest to the football. If they all do their jobs to ultimate perfection, playing WR in this league is going to be pretty damn easy :P[/quote]

a few points:
-el IS a crappy blocker, his size hurts him a lot there.
-my numbers are no more arbitrary than yours. looks at the colts or the cardinals, or the panthers when they had moose. if you have 2 #1 WRs, they can both get 1000+ yards easily. maybe he's a lot better than randle el, so he'd have more chances to make plays than him. that, again, would NOT be marginal.

-third, you totally missed the point - look at the effect TO or stallworth had on games with mcnabb compared to when he didn't have a #1 WR. look at the pats with deion branch compared to last year. it makes a huge difference, and helped them both get to super bowls.

-minnesota may have sucked a lot less if they had someone for johnson to throw the ball to also. It's nice that you can totally discount that, but without a crystal ball, your guess isn't any better than mine.

-if the WR is really good, it makes the QB, RB, OL, etc job easier. the guards and TEs on the colts aren't nearly as good or have nearly the impact that their WRs have. seriously. and saying they aren't involved on every play is like saying a CB is only involved on 1/3rd of all plays. just cause they aren't scoring TDs doesn't mean they're not blocking or running decoy to take guys away from the play.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=offiss;280831]Sorry boy's but if CJ somehow falls to us we have to take him, we deal all the great WR's we aquired last year teams should be lineing up for them.

Branch looked out of shape at the combine, which would coincide with his lazyness, I wonder if he will be any more motivated after he becomes a millionair?

I really haven't any seen any film on Adams, or Anderson, but rest assured none of them will be near the player that CJ will be.

It's nice Adams want's to be a Skin, he must have heard the Texans were gearing up to draft him.

I think the only player that really makes sense on the defensive line may be Anderson, he has the size to stop the strong side run and can get after the QB, Adams should be a RT end, we cannot put Carter on the strong side he can't hold his ground, and Branch looks like he may be the second coming of BIG DADDY WILK.[/quote]


I agree here. If CJ is available, we have to take him. We have to. You can't let this guy go.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

What's the chance of CJ falling to #6 though? Of course anything can happen, but if this guy is the real deal would someone like Tampa pass him up?

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Mattyk72;280964]What's the chance of CJ falling to #6 though? Of course anything can happen, but if this guy is the real deal would someone like Tampa pass him up?[/quote]

I think there's zero chance tampa passes on him. that doesn't mean we can't say that he seems like he'll be a great player though.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=That Guy;280953]-if the WR is really good, it makes the QB, RB, OL, etc job easier. the guards and TEs on the colts aren't nearly as good or have nearly the impact that their WRs have. seriously. and saying they aren't involved on every play is like saying a CB is only involved on 1/3rd of all plays. just cause they aren't scoring TDs doesn't mean they're not blocking or running decoy to take guys away from the play.[/quote]How does a good wide receiver make a lineman's job any easier? How does he make a running backs job any easier? Most of what wide receivers do requires the QB to do his job. So yes, theroretically a great wide receiver will improve the amount of error a QB has room for. Still, completing the pass is a lot more in control of the QB than the WR. A lot. He has to 1) read the defense, 2) identify the coverage consider the amount of time he has with the rush, 3) know all the routes (not just the one hes throwing at), 4)and deliver the ball on time AND relatively accurately. Conversely, the receiver on most plays has to first get into position to make the play (by adjusting his route if necessary), and then catch the ball. Incompletions are usually due to something that happened at the LOS (obvious exception to the drops/misread by the receiver). Most NFL caliber receivers are realtively similar in the way they do their job before the catch. Put all the names of WRs in the NFL into a hat and pick one out and I'm certain you'll get a guy who can do the above.

That's why I say that a receiver gets his value from after the catch ability. A receiver's ability to run with the ball after the catch seperates him from other receivers. In the case of Calvin Johnson, I haven't noticed a guy who is anything special after the case. I'm sure his skills are adequate, but if I'm taking a WR with my first pick in a draft, I would hope that he would be a threat to take it to the house on every reception. Santana Moss-style.

You want a receiver who is a good blocker of course, but consider what the job asks one to do. Take a corner out of a running play. Most receivers in the league can do this a good percentage of the time already. While some WRs (like Lloyd) are crappy blockers, most NFL receivers can block adequately. This ability does not make Johnson a special player.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

I am all for selecting Branch or Anderson, but if Calvin slips to 6, I dont see how we could pass him up unless someone offers a plethera of picks. He is one of the most gifted WR to come out of the draft. size, speed, strenght, and seems to have a good head on his shoulders.

If he slips, I dont think you could go wrong w/ Branch or Anderson. Gains Adams may be gifted, but we have someone his size all ready playing the right side. I think we need a guy that is strong agianst the run and can provide a pass rush from the other side. Anderson would be a better pick... to me anyway.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

Actually, I think we have a decent shot at trading down with either (or both) A. Peterson and/or B. Quinn falling to six. Both those guys fill needs for the 7-9 teams. Someone may want to leapfrog.

Sorry for the blatantly obvious and probably repetitive observation.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;280971]How does a good wide receiver make a lineman's job any easier? How does he make a running backs job any easier? [/QUOTE]

I think a good QB-WR combo can do a lot for a running back, a lineman, or a tight-end. If teams actually respect a passing attack, they tend to back off the linemen and open lanes for tailbacks.

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;280971]Most of what wide receivers do requires the QB to do his job. So yes, theroretically a great wide receiver will improve the amount of error a QB has room for. Still, completing the pass is a lot more in control of the QB than the WR. A lot. He has to 1) read the defense, 2) identify the coverage consider the amount of time he has with the rush, 3) know all the routes (not just the one hes throwing at), 4)and deliver the ball on time AND relatively accurately. Conversely, the receiver on most plays has to first get into position to make the play (by adjusting his route if necessary), and then catch the ball. Incompletions are usually due to something that happened at the LOS (obvious exception to the drops/misread by the receiver). Most NFL caliber receivers are realtively similar in the way they do their job before the catch. Put all the names of WRs in the NFL into a hat and pick one out and I'm certain you'll get a guy who can do the above.[/QUOTE]

I don't doubt that a QBs job is more mentally challenging than a WRs job, but I think you're underestimating the value of a good receiving corps.
I don't think top-notch wideouts are as replaceable as you are making them out to be. If they were easily replaceable, they would be paid accordingly. But, wideouts are paid higher than TEs, FBs, OGs, LBs, FSs, SSs, and many RBs.

[QUOTE=GTripp0012;280971]That's why I say that a receiver gets his value from after the catch ability. A receiver's ability to run with the ball after the catch seperates him from other receivers. In the case of Calvin Johnson, I haven't noticed a guy who is anything special after the case. I'm sure his skills are adequate, but if I'm taking a WR with my first pick in a draft, I would hope that he would be a threat to take it to the house on every reception. Santana Moss-style.[/QUOTE]

I definately agree that a WRs YAC is important, but I don't think that is necessarily what separates great receivers from average ones. IMHO, Santana Moss' best attribute is not his ability to make YAC (which is very impressive), but his ball-adjustment skills. How many times have we seen a poorly thrown ball snatched out of the air by Moss? I think of the grab in Week 17 by Moss on the throw by ARE, the JAX overtime grab, the catch in the endzone against the Panthers, etc.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Mattyk72;280964]What's the chance of CJ falling to #6 though? Of course anything can happen, but if this guy is the real deal would someone like Tampa pass him up?[/quote]

Weirder things have happened on draft day. Suppose Russell or Quinn slips to the five spot?

Suppose Oakland get's a wild hair and drafts A. Peterson with the first pick.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

I won't be surprised at all if Quinn slips a bit... I think Russell is a top 3 lock.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Mattyk72;280995]I won't be surprised at all if Quinn slips a bit... I think Russell is a top 3 lock.[/quote]I still think the Raiders are leaning towards Quinn...but if they don't take him, he could slide to 7-9.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

It would be weird to Quinn slide down the charts like Aaron Rogers a couple of years ago.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=Mattyk72;280964]What's the chance of CJ falling to #6 though? Of course anything can happen, but if this guy is the real deal would someone like Tampa pass him up?[/quote]

Exactly. He's gone by 6. If he was there trade down for quality picks. Some team out there would overpay draft picks for him like we always do. Wouldn't it be nice if we never knew Duckett?

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[QUOTE=JDALY27;281031]Exactly. He's gone by 6. If he was there trade down for quality picks. Some team out there would overpay draft picks for him like we always do. Wouldn't it be nice if we never knew Duckett?[/QUOTE]

Well the same guy's who brought us Duckett, Lloyd, Carter, will be handling this draft, put in your mouth pieces everyone something tells me we will be biting down hard from the pain on draft day.:banghead: :Flush:

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

A little sample of Branch's chat with ESPN.com today

[B]Alan Branch: [/B]A lot of teams have shown interest, especially the Panthers, Broncos, Detroit, Texans. As far as the scheme it does not matter to me, I know how to play in both and I have played in both. Last year I was playing the 4-3 so that is the freshest in my head, so if I had to pick I guess I would say the 4-3.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

I think we're definitely going DE and not DT.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

DE is the way to BE. lol, but yea, after watching the combine, I really like gaines adams.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

Really??

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1069429]Really??[/quote]

That's what I was thinking.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

Someone really went digging for this one.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

What is [URL="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=necro&defid=5205626"]Necroing[/URL]?

Correct.

I'll take [URL="http://www.homorazzi.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/jeopardy-call-me-maybe-teen-week.jpg"]"Hey, I Just Met You"[/URL] for 800 Alex.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

I saw this and thought " Wow! what a retarded thread I started back then".

I still say we need a quality Safety. LSU has a guy named Landry that would be a nice fit for us. Just saying.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=724Skinsfan;1069465]I saw this and thought " Wow! what a retarded thread I started back then".

I still say we need a quality Safety. LSU has a guy named Landry that would be a nice fit for us. Just saying.[/quote]

To be honest I think we'd be better off if we took AP. Sure we have Portis but AP is a once in a generation type back. One things for sure though, the Raiders will be back in the playoffs in a year or two with Russell at the helm while the Lions are wondering why their 5,582nd first round Receiver didn't pan out. Seriously Detroit just take Joe Thomas and call it a day.

These days though I'm not too concerned with who we take. My real estate portfolio is making a KILLING for me right now and is practically unstoppable. I'll probably be able to retire next year before my 23rd Birthday. I'm actually eyeing some properties in Cali, Vegas, and Detroit so if anyone wants to go in with me and make some money let me know.

Also Protip. If you currently own Google and Apple stock dump it ASAP. 100% chance both of them have peaked. My sources tell me that Microsoft is hard at work making their own search engine to compete with Google so once thats released Google will probably go the way of Alta Vista and Lycos.

The best Apples got these days is they're making a fancy phone. Like anyone will want that. Even if it sells well initially once someone makes a cheaper knockoff it'll be bye bye Apple. Sorry Jobs, you had a good run with the ipod and itunes but its over now.

Re: What will your reaction be to: "With the 6th Selection, The Redskins pick...
 

[quote=SmootSmack;280545]A lot of fans don’t believe in what the Redskins have done personnel wise. If they draft CJ, I think it will be an indication the Redskins don’t believe it either. At some point, they have to stand up for their decisions and show some faith in them. Over the last two years, they invested money and picks in Lloyd, El, and Moss to be their receivers; all while they groomed Campbell to be the man at QB for them. Well, let these guys play together now.

Focus on the D-Line.

Branch: Awesome. He’ll make everyone better right away

Anderson: Hell of a talent but I could see a Rocky in ’06 like season where he’s sitting on the bench while the staff figures out exactly where to play him

Adams: Are we switching to the 3-4 now? Golston better be beast in ‘07[/quote]


I heart this thread and this comment.

Shows the ones who "know" the most, know nothing. All hail Schneed30, no offense, smartest guy on this board.

Hail.