Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

why anyone would call thrash a stud is beyond me.mr. fair catch and barely made any special team tackles.i dont know what he makes,but if its over the veterans minimum,its too much

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]why anyone would call thrash a stud is beyond me.mr. fair catch and barely made any special team tackles.i dont know what he makes,but if its over the veterans minimum,its too much[/QUOTE]


special teams player of the week? wasn't he 2 weeks in a row or 2 of 3 weeks span???

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

ok maybe not stud but...

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

Actually I would call him a "Special Teams Stud", just like Ade Jimoh is a "Special Teams Demon".

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=TheMalcolmConnection]Actually I would call him a "Special Teams Stud", just like Ade Jimoh is a "Special Teams Demon".[/QUOTE]

wait a minute, are you saying The Ade is an STD?

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

special teams don't get the respect unless they are scoring the TD's or their name is dante hall or Brian Mitchell. And even B Mitch didn't get the respect becomin a vet w/ the skins. glad they let him retire w/ the burg and gold.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=TAFKAS]wait a minute, are you saying The Ade is an STD?[/QUOTE]

HAHAHAHA! I can't believe we never thought about that.

"I slept with this girl last night and I think she gave me Ade." :(

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]why anyone would call thrash a stud is beyond me.mr. fair catch and barely made any special team tackles.i dont know what he makes,but if its over the veterans minimum,its too much[/QUOTE]


The guy is one HELL of a special teams player, he may not be the best returner, but hes a big part of our specials.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

i think more of ade on special teams than i do of thrash.im not sure what that means????

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

Thrash was the guy (when Tupa was punting) who was down there almost EVERY TIME to down the ball within the 5.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

tupa???you must be talking ancient history.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

Yup, that ancient history that was all of one season ago. Regardless of who was there as punter, both Jimoh and Thrash were always ALL OVER the punts that Frost "boomed".

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=dmek25]i think more of ade on special teams than i do of thrash.im not sure what that means????[/QUOTE]

I disagree because Thrash is available to receive as well as cover.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

D'BOYZ, lavar saves 4.2 regardless. jansen, samuels, springs, brunell, portis, thomas have all restructured if the cba dies. that could be over 10$ mill + 4.2 (lavar) right there.

the projected cuts (regardless of cba) are 11$mill. we're not in terrible shape.

the 30% rule ONLY went into effect because its the year before an expiring cba (and the last salary capped season). A new cba would kill it.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

w/e happeend to talkin ab archuleta

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=jordanz301]w/e happeend to talkin ab archuleta[/QUOTE]


I was thinking the same thing?????

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]D'BOYZ, lavar saves 4.2 regardless. jansen, samuels, springs, brunell, portis, thomas have all restructured if the cba dies. that could be over 10$ mill + 4.2 (lavar) right there.

the projected cuts (regardless of cba) are 11$mill. we're not in terrible shape.

the 30% rule ONLY went into effect because its the year before an expiring cba (and the last salary capped season). A new cba would kill it.[/QUOTE]


Yeah I know the 4.2 is saved regardless because of him being cut and that was the agreement for his realeas

And no the 30% rule has Allways been in the CBA check previous contracts you can't have a contract with a BASE salary with an increase of the salary of beyond 30% each season. you can have roster bonus, incentives, or bonus but the player salary can't have an increase of beyond 30%

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

Take one step forward. Then slide to the right. Insert conversation here. No! do not go off on related tangents......No Thrash for you!

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=D'BOYZ]Yeah I know the 4.2 is saved regardless because of him being cut and that was the agreement for his realeas

And no the 30% rule has Allways been in the CBA check previous contracts you can't have a contract with a BASE salary with an increase of the salary of beyond 30% each season. you can have roster bonus, incentives, or bonus but the player salary can't have an increase of beyond 30%[/QUOTE]

no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P[/QUOTE]
well, he is a dallas fan...

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

Adam Archuleta...just trying to get us back on topic

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

I don't really like the idea of adding him. He's suspect in pass coverage. I don't really look at him much different than Roy Williams. They're glorified linebackers.

"If they want a slightly better, infinitely more expensive version of Matt Bowen, they should would just keep him."

That's what a buddy of mine said about Archuleta coming to the Skins...he's a Rams fan.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=That Guy]no, the 30% rule only came into effect this year, that's why guys like jansen and others jumped up in salary this season. It stays in effect into uncapped years too.

jansen in 2004 made 1.3, this year he makes 4mill, 1.3 *1.3 = 1.8 * 1.3 = 2.4.

2.4 is not close to 4, so the contract had to jump more than 30% in base in either 2005 or 2006. so you're wrong :P[/QUOTE]
Yup.

I think your understanding of the reasoning for the 30% rule is also off. The 30% rule was provided so teams couldn't restructure th ehll out of contracts in the '06 season to be cap compliant. It was one of the poision pills they thought would force everyone to play nice and get a CBA done. Example.

Player A has a 5 year deal with a 10 mil signing bonus. With three years left in '06 his salary is lets say 3 mil. That gives him a cap number of 5 mil. Without the 30% rule the player restructures that into a bonus and reduces his salary to the vet minimum. That makes his salary .450 mil(i think) and his bonus prorate 3 mil(original signing bonus prorate of 2 plus the new bonus prorate of 1). His cap number is now 3.45. But this can't be done because no player is going to negotiate down his future salary which is most likely more than 30% above 3.45 since these slaries are used as leverage by players.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

i understand it fine. it was so you couldn't have $1 contracts this year and 20million next year. and it'll stay in effect unless a new cba comes into effect or a new salary cap is constructed at some later date without it (if the current cba efforts do die).

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

How bout moving him to the Weakside spot? All he needs to gain is 7 pounds.

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

[QUOTE=jdlea]I don't really like the idea of adding him. He's suspect in pass coverage. I don't really look at him much different than Roy Williams. They're glorified linebackers.

"If they want a slightly better, infinitely more expensive version of Matt Bowen, they should would just keep him."

That's what a buddy of mine said about Archuleta coming to the Skins...he's a Rams fan.[/QUOTE]

i always kinda liked matt bowen gw jst seemed to not like him. he was a pretty good tackler. but i would never forget when TROY HAMBRICK broke his ankles so bad in a dallas game like a long time ago. troy hambrick sucked so bad but wen he faced the skins he was always beast. the past couple yrs dallas went through, troy hambrick, eddie george, julios jones, barber whos next?..

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

as for archuleta i love the guy love to see him in washington if we lose ryan clark

Re: Adam Archuleta to the Skins?
 

ryan clark still hangs out in ashburn, he has shown e wants to stay