Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=52300)

skinsfan69 03-27-2013 12:08 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=diehardskin2982;1000512][URL="http://httr24-7.com/draft/debunking-the-myth-that-is-the-honey-badger-why-tyrann-mathieu-wont-work-for-the-redskins/"]"Debunking the Myth that is the Honey Badger" -Why Tyrann Mathieu Won't Work for the Redskins[/URL]

One persons opinion[/quote]

So this person thinks that because Mathieu couldn't bench press at the combine means he can't cover bigger NFL wr's. To me that's laughable and that tells me his football IQ is low.

Chico23231 03-27-2013 12:09 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=skinsfan69;1000526]Nickel corners are just like starters in today's NFL. I think when you add in the fact that he's a great teams player you have to take him. We could fill two needs with that pick.[/quote]

good points. Kick returner is a huge need

diehardskin2982 03-27-2013 12:12 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=skinsfan69;1000535]So this person thinks that because Mathieu couldn't bench press at the combine means he can't cover bigger NFL wr's. To me that's laughable and that tells me his football IQ is low.[/quote]

I agree.

mredskins 03-27-2013 12:13 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=skinsfan69;1000535]So this person thinks that because Mathieu couldn't bench press at the combine means he can't cover bigger NFL wr's. To me that's laughable and that tells me his football IQ is low.[/quote]

I think you misunderstood him.

His quote:

[I]Tyrann Mathieu is undersized as a defensive back at only 5’9 and 186 lbs. His film, and his poor showing at the combine in strength testing showed his inability to match large receivers in their physicality. [/I]

Sounds like he is saying his size and strength are question marks.

[I]In 2011, Tennessee Tech’s[B] Da’Rick Rogers[/B] (6’2, 217lb) basically carried Mathieu fifteen yards on his back following initial contact, and only went down when[B] Brandon Taylor[/B] saved the day with the assist. [/I]

At 5'9" and 186 LBS guy sounds like Brandon Banks honestly.

mredskins 03-27-2013 12:15 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
But to be fair D. Green was 5-9 184 lbs and he did pretty good for himself.

Tyler Dahnke 03-27-2013 12:27 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=skinsfan69;1000535]So this person thinks that because Mathieu couldn't bench press at the combine means he can't cover bigger NFL wr's. To me that's laughable and that tells me his football IQ is low.[/quote]

Excellent ad hominem attack.. I'm glad the one sentence bench press reference is the only thing you took away from my article

mredskins 03-27-2013 12:30 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=Tyler Dahnke;1000541]Excellent ad hominem attack.. I'm glad the one sentence bench press reference is the only thing you took away from my article[/quote]

So now HTTR24-7 is on the warpath. Interesting.


Well welcome.

Chico23231 03-27-2013 12:32 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
touchy on an opinion web-article arent we?

MTK 03-27-2013 12:32 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
His size concerns me as well. The guy is a flea at 5'9 186. He would be a joke at safety. Concerns about his lack of strength are legit too when you're talking about having to jam WRs.

Ruhskins 03-27-2013 12:35 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
I'd like to see the Skins get bigger guys in the secondary. If we draft Mathieu, it wouldn't be the end of the world, though I'd prefer to use a 4th or lower on him.

mredskins 03-27-2013 12:36 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=Chico23231;1000543]touchy on an opinion web-article arent we?[/quote]
I don't know whom you are speaking to directly but if you say someone has a low NFL/football IQ I would take that as a personal attack.

firstdown 03-27-2013 12:41 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=mredskins;1000539]But to be fair D. Green was 5-9 184 lbs and he did pretty good for himself.[/quote]

I agree but how much bigger are the WR's in todays game?

Ruhskins 03-27-2013 12:42 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=mredskins;1000539]But to be fair D. Green was 5-9 184 lbs and he did pretty good for himself.[/quote]

I am curious though if there were many 6'-2"+/220+ lbs receivers in D. Green's day.

Chico23231 03-27-2013 12:43 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=mredskins;1000546]I don't know whom you are speaking to directly but if you say someone has a low NFL/football IQ I would take that as a personal attack.[/quote]

or probably just an opinion, much like the article. Sorry if I expect a little more to back up that opinion than a stomp my feet and say hey i can see what you write.

When it comes to football opinions, it shouldnt be taken personal.

MTK 03-27-2013 12:47 PM

Re: Thread Series: The case for/against Tyrann Mathieu
 
[quote=mredskins;1000546]I don't know whom you are speaking to directly but if you say someone has a low NFL/football IQ I would take that as a personal attack.[/quote]

Yeah no need for that. I thought the article raised some valid points.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.28523 seconds with 9 queries