Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=5046)

Winskins 03-02-2005 09:54 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
Hey until I hear inks hit the paper I don't wanna get too down, but never the less a little unnerving. 6 years at $26 million isn't really all too unreasonable or anything. If you really think about what some other players are getting paid.

With a $6.5 million dollar bonus I would figure that the cap number for this year wouldn't be too unreasonable either, but maybe someone can tell me what kind of cap money that would take up this year...

KLHJ2 03-02-2005 09:56 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=Cush]Bell and Pierce are the same age (a few months apart)[/QUOTE]

I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.

In my defense though If we cant keep Pierce then I thing that we should draft a LB.

wolfeskins 03-02-2005 10:01 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=angryssg]I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.



at no time did anything you said make sense, we are all dumber now for having read it.:laughing2

Winskins 03-02-2005 10:03 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
Nice one wolf, but no more watching Billy Madison for you

wolfeskins 03-02-2005 10:05 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
oohh to touch the hiny.

PSUskinsfan11 03-02-2005 10:06 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
If Pierce leaves without given us a shot at matching the deal fcuk him. He said that he wanted to be a redskin and he would give us a shot at matching so if he doesn't he isn't worth the time. Barrow would give us time to find a solid replacement plus Clinton Smith could be the next Pierce for all we know. Don't rule out Danny goin after Hartwell or Bell though.

KLHJ2 03-02-2005 10:08 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=wolfeskins][QUOTE=angryssg]I stand corrected and feel like a jackass at the same time. Thank you for showing me the error in my ways. I am therefore awarded no points and may God have mercy on my soul.



at no time did anything you said make sense, we are all dumber now for having read it.:laughing2[/QUOTE]

Thanks, you have boosted my confidence and my self esteem.

MTK 03-02-2005 10:10 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=smootsmack]isn't Pierce unrestricted? Do the Redskins even have the option to match?[/QUOTE]

Yeah he's unrestricted, but he said recently that he would give the Skins a chance to match any offers. We'll see if he holds true to that, or maybe more importantly, will the Skins consider matching if they are indeed given that chance?

saden1 03-02-2005 10:10 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
Skins should match. This is chump change money and he is worth it. I bet the Giant contract is back loaded. The real question is how good will he be? In two to three years he might command 15+ million signing bonus.

e16bball 03-02-2005 10:10 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?

cpayne5 03-02-2005 10:10 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
I think Pierce will give the Skins a chance to match. He has shown loyalty to the club in the past, such as playing for a less lucrative deal than what other teams were offering last year.

joecrisp 03-02-2005 10:14 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
Could be that Pierce has already given the Skins the opportunity to match, and they decided it didn't fit their salary cap projections for the next few years. I doubt Pierce would totally forsake Williams, not to mention Snyder's checkbook. Barrow's supposedly going to be ready to practice during the offseason camps, and they've re-signed their young backups, so maybe throwing a lot of money at Pierce doesn't make sense, given those factors.

KLHJ2 03-02-2005 10:14 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=e16bball]As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?[/QUOTE]

Theoretically I would rather have pierce and smoot, but I would rather let go of pierce than smoot

skins009 03-02-2005 10:15 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
I saw we let Pierce go. He is a good player, but he can be replace. Part of his success was because of the system. Barrow should be able to replace him if he's healthy. I think we MUST resign Smoot. He is a rising star who really effects what GW can do on defense. Plus i think we can draft a good young MLB in the third round and have in ready to play in one year.

saden1 03-02-2005 10:17 PM

Re: FOX Sports Says Pierce is Gone
 
[QUOTE=e16bball]As a theoretical question, assuming the money is essentially the same, would you rather have Rolle and Pierce or Smoot and Hartwell?[/QUOTE]

Continuity is always a better option. Getting up to speed takes time. You can't just throw someone in and expect them to perform from the get go. I'd rather keep Pierce and Smoot.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 0.39236 seconds with 9 queries