Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

Randy Thomas to the IR

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=WaldSkins;604821]Randy Thomas to the IR[/quote]

Already in it. How about Wynn? He's been inactive for 4 weeks.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;604823]Already in it. How about Wynn? He's been inactive for 4 weeks.[/quote]Wynn is what I was thinking.

There's plenty of people who won't make it through the season. Smoot, Aldridge, Batiste, Henson possibly among them. But Wynn has been inactive every week, and I think he'll be the one to go this week. And it has a lot to do with the play of Daniels, I think.

Remember though, that Wynn's entire salary is guaranteed for the year, so he's paid for 17 weeks whether he ever plays a snap or not.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=redskins5044;604799]Montgomery to IR[/quote]

I agree. He's been inactive because of injury hasn't he? With the guys we have I don't see him playing alot this year. Besides, Golston is Blache's guy.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

Either Wynn, Henson or Monty to the IR.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

How bout Wynn AND Betts

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;604847]I would think Wynn or Alridge. Wynn seems more expendable particularly with Jarmon starting to come along, but wiith Montgomery out at least two more weeks and Griffin possibly out this SUnday (and maybe longer) they might need to start looking at Daniels playing more minutes inside...[B]so does that mean Wynn is activated? Probably not actually.[/B]

I could see them possibly cutting Alridge and then hoping to re-sign him once they cut Pakulak. But I suspect one reason they might be trying out all these running backs is in case they cut Alridge but are unable to re-sign him.[/quote]

I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=GMScud;604851]I don't understand why Wynn made the 53 man if he's going to be inactive every week. If we're going to keep a guy only to have him inactive on game day, why not a young talent we're trying to develop (a la Rinehart last year)?? No point on having a guy in the twilight of his career on the inactive list every damn Sunday.[/quote]

Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

Told you guys from the day we signed him..Wynn sucks and was a wasted roster spot. Cut him now please.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

hopefully wynn

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;604862]Could have had Rob Jackson on the roster instead.[/quote]

Or Dixon

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

I would cut Wynn.

Re: Who will the skins cut to make for Pakulak?
 

[quote=Angry;604971]I think that Dan and Vinny are reading this thread waiting to see the consensus after about 50 replies before they make their decision today. Maybe the mods can help them out and add a pole because the suspense is killing me.[/quote]


Probably true.

Thread needs poll obv