Commanders Post at The Warpath

Commanders Post at The Warpath (http://www.thewarpath.net/forum.php)
-   Locker Room Main Forum (http://www.thewarpath.net/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet (http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=28473)

DirtyLandry 02-21-2009 01:33 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
The only rating I would question is Tank Johnson as an 86. I believe that his infamy and being a cowboy can be attributed to him being overrated.

BigHairedAristocrat 02-21-2009 01:35 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
nice job. thanks for putting that together. if you have the time, it would be awesome if there was a column stating the players current status (ufa, rfa, franchised, etc)

also, please tell me these ratings dont come from madden 09 ;-)

GTripp0012 02-21-2009 09:42 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=BigHairedAristocrat;528613]nice job. thanks for putting that together. if you have the time, it would be awesome if there was a column stating the players current status (ufa, rfa, franchised, etc)

also, please tell me these ratings dont come from madden 09 ;-)[/quote]Thanks. All players in this document are UFA. In the update next week, I'll put out a column for the players who have the franchise designation.

GTripp0012 02-21-2009 09:47 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=BeastsoftheNFCeast;528605]Im just wondering, how accurate would you say your ratings are? How well do you really know these players?
I cant flat out say that these ratings are off because I havent seen all these guys play consistently...Im just saying Im skeptical about multiple ratings like OJ Atogwe who is rated as a below average player, but on paper over the last 3 years he has 16 picks (5.4 per year) 11 forced fumbles (3.7 per year) and 235 tackles (78 tackles per year).
I know everyone has different ratings on players but it kinda seems like alot of numbers were just thrown out there without much basis behind it...
Lol, I feel like a dick for saying this because I use tools like this alot and do appreciate you doing this.[/quote]My ratings are more accurate than most sources, and less accurate than the best league sources (of which I do not have access to ;) ) So yeah, feel free to disagree with whatever ones you feel like you have some inside info on. All of my ratings are based on information that is at least somewhat public [or that I have made public], (like O.J. Atogwe not being able to cover or tackle all that well, and much of his value coming off a return TD fumble by our Guard).

DirtyLandry 02-21-2009 10:07 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=GTripp0012;528703]and much of his value coming off a return TD fumble by our Guard).[/quote]

:laughing2 Good stuff.

SkinsExaminer 02-21-2009 11:21 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
FYI,

Defensivie tackles Ryan Sims and Dwan Edwards were resigned by Tampa and Baltimore. Edwards could have been a no risk signing for the Redskins. He was hurt in 2008 but did well in 2007 as a replacement for the the Ravens.

MTK 02-26-2009 06:54 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
update:


[url]http://www.thewarpath.net/2009FreeAgents.htm[/url]

saden1 03-28-2009 02:38 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
Leonard Weaver is 88? That can't be right.

GTripp0012 03-28-2009 03:51 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=saden1;540379]Leonard Weaver is 88? That can't be right.[/quote]In the context of position, I would say it's fair. He clearly brings an element to the offense that most FBs don't.

Sellers on the same scale would be a 90 or a 91, so it's pretty moot from our perspective, especially so since he signed with Philly a day after I sent these in.

bigm29 03-28-2009 03:52 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
Great Job. However I would say that Tory Holt is still the best WR available...he can still play. Where did you get the rankings from?

GTripp0012 03-28-2009 04:22 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=bigm29;540388]Great Job. However I would say that Tory Holt is still the best WR available...he can still play. Where did you get the rankings from?[/quote]The rankings themselves are mathematically based at positions like QB, RB, WR, CB, S, and DL...but I did create the 79 scale myself, so I guess they become my own ratings.

Positions like FB, OL, LB where the ratings can't be based much on data are a best guess by me to place them on the 79 scale based on how they've been used, and thusly, obviously subject to human error and bias.

SmootSmack 03-28-2009 10:44 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
Weaver signed with the Eagles by the way, so you gotta update this bad boy again

GTripp0012 03-28-2009 11:56 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=SmootSmack;540441]Weaver signed with the Eagles by the way, so you gotta update this bad boy again[/quote]I'm up to date, but I don't think Matty would like me very much if I just flooded his inbox every time a signing was made ;)

saden1 03-29-2009 12:47 PM

Re: 2009 Free Agents Spreadsheet
 
[quote=GTripp0012;540387]In the context of position, I would say it's fair. He clearly brings an element to the offense that most FBs don't.

Sellers on the same scale would be a 90 or a 91, so it's pretty moot from our perspective, especially so since he signed with Philly a day after I sent these in.[/quote]


He signed a one year contract with the Eagles at age 26. That aught to tell you something about him. I've seen the guy play plenty, he's so-so at best and if you look at the game logs they tell you just as much. He's a slightly better catcher than Rod Gardner, his blocking leaves much to be desired much of the time, and his running is inconsistent. At 87 you're too kind to Mr. Weaver.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.39155 seconds with 9 queries