Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

Means nothing beyond the fact that the unexpected can happen. My money is on the Ravens to win it all (Big Ben + Ed Reed = INT) but then again I remember what happened last year.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=The Goat;519648]All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.[/quote]

Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

I don't think it means anything.

Now let's go Arizona. Go out and beat the brakes of the Filth-a-delphia Yardbirds. Better yet win the Superbowl. He he he. Yeah Right!

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=Giantone;519636]Yup , the Eagles beat the Giants today now the #1,2,and 3 seed of the NFC are all out which bows well fro the AFC.We were out played but more important we were out coached today AR beat Coughlin all the way around the board.I'll be rooting for the Steelers becuase McNabb is so classless I just can't root for him.:)[/quote]

The QB sneak call was horrible. You've got Jacobs back there and you run Eli over Jacobs??

Why the hate for McNabb??

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=The Goat;519648]All it means is that the Steelers are likely to win another SB and we all get hear Steelers fans louder than ever. F*ck.[/quote]

Hopefully the Ravens win. Anyone but the Eagles. Anyone.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;519650]Wrong. I think Baltimore pulls the upset.[/quote]

I hope you and Saden are right... personally I just want the trophy to stay w/ the NFC at this point.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

Q: Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

A: Iz Dangers

[YT]uVKIZiwaQQ8[/YT]

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=The Goat;519657]I hope you and Saden are right... personally I just want the trophy to stay w/ the NFC at this point.[/quote]

My prediction is Baltimore vs Arizona in the SB. I hope I'm right.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

Baltimore got some real lucky breaks against Tenn and I think their corners are suspect. I don't think they beat Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

When it was clear Steelers were going to win, CBS Sports game telecast showed an interesting graphic near the end of the Steelers v Chargers game.

Top three defenses in NFL in 2008 (ranking was based on total Defense):
1) Pittsburgh Steelers
2) Baltimore Ravens
3) Philadelphia Eagles

Then Joe Buck says, "how interesting the top three defenses in 2008 in total defense are represented as three of the finalists for the superbowl."

This was a CBS stat so dont ask me where they got their figures.

This is more relevant to who should win and how teams win then trying to make some kind of logic out of the first post in this thread about team beat A and team b...and trying to make some kind of logic out that. you can't.

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=Defensewins;519676]When it was clear Steelers were going to win, CBS Sports game telecast showed an interesting graphic near the end of the Steelers v Chargers game.

Top three defenses in NFL in 2008 (ranking was based on total Defense):
1) Pittsburgh Steelers
2) Baltimore Ravens
3) Philadelphia Eagles

Then Joe Buck says, "how interesting the top three defenses in 2008 in total defense are represented as three of the finalists for the superbowl."

This was a CBS stat so dont ask me where they got their figures.

This is more relevant to who should win and how teams win then trying to make some kind of logic out of the first post in this thread about team beat A and team b...and trying to make some kind of logic out that. you can't.[/quote]

What was Joe Buck doing talking during a CBS telecast?

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

They don't say defense win championships for nothing. Even the Rams back in 1999 had a great defense (ranked #4 in the league).

Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?
 

[quote=SmootSmack;519679]What was Joe Buck doing talking during a CBS telecast?[/quote]

Your right it was not Joe Buck. It was who ever was partnered with Phil Simms during that game.?.?