yea I have a hard time playing peopel against the skins, but Im not going to bench moss, mcnabb, or toomer this year, because they are some of my studs on my fantasy team.

????????????????????????????
 

[QUOTE=Ade Jimoh Fan Club]These are the pillars of my draft theory:

Pillar 1: Draft RB's early - no s*#%^!
Pillar 2: I always draft at least one Redskin and never a Cowboy - I don't care if Ladanian gets traded to Dallas and I have the first pick. (by the way, this habit of drafting redskins has hurt me in the past few years).
Pillar 3: Draft a sleeper in Round 5 or 6.
Pillar 4: Pick one rookie - only one!
Pillar 5: Never draft a WR if he's the only draftable WR on his team.
Pillar 6: Never draft a player with a girl's name (exception - Shannon Sharpe).[/QUOTE]


I'm not sure I understand why on pillars 2-6.

I will only take a Dallas "D", after last year. No other 'roids, and I exclude all druggies like QC & R. Williams.
Why one Rook?
Why not the WR if he is the only draftable WR on his team?
There are a lot of girls names. Sean Salisbury, Shaun King, Ade Jimoh, etc.
HeHateme, Adelwale Ogunleye!

I will always take a receiver if hes the only good one on the team. Which explain why I drafted randy moss with my first pick this year. OR why chambers is a great pick, or Owens, or a couple other great receivers.

The rookie thing can go either way. Ive got Fitzgerald on my team this year, hopefully he'll have a huge year for me.

[QUOTE=backrow]I'm not sure I understand why on pillars 2-6.

I will only take a Dallas "D", after last year. No other 'roids, and I exclude all druggies like QC & R. Williams.
Why one Rook?
Why not the WR if he is the only draftable WR on his team?
There are a lot of girls names. Sean Salisbury, Shaun King, Ade Jimoh, etc.
HeHateme, Adelwale Ogunleye![/QUOTE]

These are all judgement calls that I make - Rules of Engagement. I think it's fun to pick a rookie - but not a good idea to have more than one on your team. If there's not another good WR on the team, your #1 stud will suffer (example: Moulds w/o Price). I would not have recommended Chambers, but now that Booker's in town - he'd be a decent grab. On the girl-name thing, that's just good business - name one super stud who has a chick's name!

[QUOTE=Mattyk72]I keep my heart out of FF. I'll take 'Skins as long as they are worthy, and I won't shy away from taking Cowboys.[/QUOTE]

If you really want to win at fantasy football, that is the attitude you HAVE to take. But I am like you - for that one or two games a year that a guy plays against the Skins, it is tough to put him in the lineup. If they are a borderline player or if they are going against a true strength on the Redskins, I will bench them. A quality player stays in my lineup if I can't find SOME justification for benching him, besides the fact I will be rooting AGAINST him that day LOL. What's really nice is when your fantasy player has a big game against the Skins, but the Skins WIN!!

[QUOTE=Hogskin] What's really nice is when your fantasy player has a big game against the Skins, but the Skins WIN!![/QUOTE]

I hear that! That's definitely the best...

By the way, I was never condoning benching a stud player (ie 1st round pick) against the skins... that's nutz.

[QUOTE=Ade Jimoh Fan Club]These are all judgement calls that I make - Rules of Engagement. I think it's fun to pick a rookie - but not a good idea to have more than one on your team. If there's not another good WR on the team, your #1 stud will suffer (example: Moulds w/o Price). I would not have recommended Chambers, but now that Booker's in town - he'd be a decent grab. On the girl-name thing, that's just good business - name one super stud who has a chick's name![/QUOTE]

Gale Sayers was pretty decent, and thats kinda feminine. Same with Terry, as in Terry Baldshaw.

[url]http://www.ffbookmarks.com/[/url] this is the best site on the web. it is a site link to all. its links are grouped like 'who to start' 'who to pick up'...ect check it out

thanks for the link.