Re: Trade up
 

Smokescreens, mirrors and magic tricks prior to the draft.... Oh yea, and the rumors... Relax, just a couple of weeks away:)

Re: Trade up
 

Hey tazhog, what's with all the posting on threads that are a week old...and i mean all of them. At the very least, its pretty annoying

anyway didn't want to start a thread about this cuz its not big news, but I went to the univ of md and i thought this was interesting

[url=http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=10672]Hollenbach Hopes For a Chance[/url]

I like it when i see terps become skins, doubt we need hollenbach though.

Re: Trade up
 

I'm new to this site. Just found it yesterday. Didn't know I was doing anything annoying... Sorry if I'm offending anyone... Just a diehard Redskin fan who is "keyed up" for the draft and found these threads interesting... That's all...

Re: Trade up
 

I wanna trade up, but not this bad.

This would be an obvious and egregious step in the wrong direction for the Redskins

Re: Trade up
 

I believe this guy is the only reason the Skins would consider trading up:
[url=http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20070411-034449-2735r.htm]Johnson makes a visit to meet with Redskins - Sports - The Washington Times, America's Newspaper[/url]

Re: Trade up
 

trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.

Re: Trade up
 

[quote=rvd420;297111]trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.[/quote]


finally rvd20 makes sense

Re: Trade up
 

[quote=SonnySamFrank;294349]Ever since I heard the rumor about the Skins trading up to the #1 pick and the interest in J. Russell, I have had a bad feeling.....

Trade to Oakland for the #1 pick:
J. Campbell, #6 Pick, and another player or draft pick.

Which means that Gibbs would be able to start the "8" car next year while J. Russell holds the clipboard for a year!

Please tell me that the Redskins are not this stupid![/quote]

Dude chill out. What do you think would happen if Gibbs and our FO made this type of move? The whole city would go out to Redskin Park and burn the place down. JC is our guy. We have 2 number one picks invested in him. He's finally getting all the reps w/ the first team this whole off season which was not the case the last two years. He's finally in the same offense two years in a row for the first time in 5 or 6 years. Do you think we would throw all that away to start over again??????????????????? C'mon. Not even our FO is that stupid.

Re: Trade up
 

[quote=rvd420;297111]trading up would be the stupidest thing we do.[/quote]

It wouldn't be if we got Calvin Johnson. But it's not going to happen. If anything we need to trade down and try and get some more quality depth.

Re: Trade up
 

[quote=BDBohnzie;297069]I believe this guy is the only reason the Skins would consider trading up:
[URL="http://washingtontimes.com/sports/20070411-034449-2735r.htm"]Johnson makes a visit to meet with Redskins*-*Sports*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper[/URL][/quote]

He had 76 catches for all those yards and TD's and had a terrible college QB. If his college qb ( i forget the guys name) was standing in front of the ocean and all he all he had to do was throw a football in the ocean he would miss the ocean. he sucked so bad it wasn't even funny. So that tells you how good CJ is.

ps. oh yeah his name was reggie ball. actually i'm pissed at reggie ball. i lost $ on one of tech's game's because ball kept missing johnson who was wide open all day.

Re: Trade up
 

[QUOTE=tazhog;295530]I'm new to this site. Just found it yesterday. Didn't know I was doing anything annoying... Sorry if I'm offending anyone... Just a diehard Redskin fan who is "keyed up" for the draft and found these threads interesting... That's all...[/QUOTE]

Thanks for joining. When I first joined I probably made 50 posts per day, so I understand your enthusiasm. Welcome.

Re: Trade up
 

we dont need calvin johnson we need a pass rushing de,like charles johnson.

Re: Trade up
 

Trading up for Calvin Johnson would be so good. I think that trading down is a more viable option, we should add some day one picks in our poor mix.

Re: Trade up
 

we do need a tall receiver,but trading up would be really stupid,not to mention what it would take to get cj.we should take a receiver on the second day.you never know we could end up with another marques colston.we have to many smurf receivers,our tallest one is ryan hoag at 6 foot.

Re: Trade up
 

I think our receiving corps is just fine. Brandon Lloyd isn't tiny. Moreover, tall receivers are good red zone threats, but Cooley and Sellers fill that role nicely. Besides, the original smurfs did fine by me.