Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=WillH;1194304]I have been waiting for that man to be replaced for so long. Fine, have him coach up and backup Welsh or Kouandjo or whoever, but If no-one can beat him out for the job to start the season I'll be pissed.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]



Yeah Lauvao has been a nightmare. Whats he gonna teach them - how to get out of the way? Keep him the fook away.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1194313]Can't find details of his contract, do we have an idea ? The fact that he wasn't signed by anybody else must have allowed us to sign it on the cheap, doesn't it?

I assume we're not spending big on him, and not guaranteeing much of it either, so yeah, we'll have competition at LG, which is good, I hope Sean Welsh wows every body and wins the job.[/quote]

Haven’t seen numbers but I suspect you’re right, it must be close to vet min.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=EARTHQUAKE2689;1194310]Sounds about right, I was around 250 as a freshman.[/QUOTE]



Is that why your nickname is earthquake?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[IMG]http://uvcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/cinco-de-mayo-featured-blog-image-unlimited-vacation-club.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=sdskinsfan2001;1194328][IMG]http://uvcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/cinco-de-mayo-featured-blog-image-unlimited-vacation-club.jpg[/IMG][/quote]

Oh La!!!!

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=calia;1194325]Is that why your nickname is earthquake?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote]

That has been my nickname since I was like 2 years old

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=EARTHQUAKE2689;1194333]That has been my nickname since I was like 2 years old[/quote]

remember the old wrestler named Earthquake?? [IMG]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/49/Tenta.jpg/220px-Tenta.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[url]https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/559528/zane-beadles[/url]

Should they sign him?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

His PFF grades are the same as our guys.(32.9) Maybe he's worth a look but better players may still be cut.[QUOTE=WillH;1194338][url]https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/559528/zane-beadles[/url]

Should they sign him?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=CRedskinsRule;1194340]His PFF grades are the same as our guys.(32.9) Maybe he's worth a look but better players may still be cut.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, I saw that after I posted. My bad. The initial part about not missing any time looked promising.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[URL="https://omny.fm/shows/cooley-and-kevin-with-chris-cooley-and-kevin-sheeh/05-07-18-cooley-film-breakdown-geron-christian"]Cooley's film breakdown of our 3rd round pick OT Geron Christian[/URL]

He likes him a lot, [B]loves[/B] the pick, excited about it, says he's not as raw as people say, sees him [U]100% as a starter in this league[/U]:

[B]+[/B] can play both LT and RT (in fact his college team made their tackles switch side several times during games), exceptional footwork, good pass protecter, nasty guy in the run game, super long arms, really good at re-establishing him self and moving his feet, hard to get around in the pass game, fluid, good balance

[B]-[/B] could be more immediately impactful with his first hit, never wins with his first punch, lets guys get too close to him because he's a bit late with his hands, panics a little bit sometimes against speed

Cooley finished his breakdown saying he's [U]talented enough to be a week 1 starter[/U]! (This is not what we drafted him for, but this could be turn out to be a great pick).

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1194343][URL="https://omny.fm/shows/cooley-and-kevin-with-chris-cooley-and-kevin-sheeh/05-07-18-cooley-film-breakdown-geron-christian"]Cooley's film breakdown of our 3rd round pick OT Geron Christian[/URL]

He likes him a lot, [B]loves[/B] the pick, excited about it, says he's not as raw as people say, sees him [U]100% as a starter in this league[/U]:

[B]+[/B] can play both LT and RT (in fact his college team made their tackles switch side several times during games), exceptional footwork, good pass protecter, nasty guy in the run game, super long arms, really good at re-establishing him self and moving his feet, hard to get around in the pass game, fluid, good balance

[B]-[/B] could be more immediately impactful with his first hit, never wins with his first punch, lets guys get too close to him because he's a bit late with his hands, panics a little bit sometimes against speed

Cooley finished his breakdown saying he's [U]talented enough to be a week 1 starter[/U]! (This is not what we drafted him for, but this could be turn out to be a great pick).[/quote]

That is very exciting news! The draft day deal to move down in the 2nd and pick up a 3rd is looking very smart, indeed. We end up with Guice [U]and[/U] Christian. Nice!

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=KI Skins Fan;1194344]That is very exciting news! The draft day deal to move down in the 2nd and pick up a 3rd is looking very smart, indeed. We end up with Guice [U]and[/U] Christian. Nice![/QUOTE]Depending on how whoever starts at LG for us plays, we may be having a close to perfect off season.

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[url]https://247sports.com/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/Bolt/Bovada-releases-NFC-and-AFC-Championship-odds-for-2018-season-118044087[/url]

I love the disrespect

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

The Packers have no business being that high

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

I really can't understand why Vegas gives us such a shitty chance. I can't argue that we should be viewed as a definite top 6 in the NFC (playoff team) but to be so low just doesn't make sense.

I feel like Vegas isn't appropriately recognizing the impact of the injuries on our team last year. Either that or they don't like Alex Smith. I just can't make sense of it.

I don't see how we're not at least 8-8 this year.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Schneed10;1194352]I really can't understand why Vegas gives us such a shitty chance. I can't argue that we should be viewed as a definite top 6 in the NFC (playoff team) but to be so low just doesn't make sense.

I feel like Vegas isn't appropriately recognizing the impact of the injuries on our team last year. Either that or they don't like Alex Smith. I just can't make sense of it.

I don't see how we're not at least 8-8 this year.[/quote]

This is the 2nd one I've seen that had us low, I don't get it either.. How can you have the giants and boys ahead of us when they both had crappy seasons too, Dallas lost their best 2 pass catchers and really didn't replace them... Also having the Niners that high is a joke.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

They might ranked us too low, but to be honest, I don't blame them.. The last time we had a winning record is back in 2012 with 10-6. Yes we went 9-7 in 2015 but we were one loss away from .500 that season. Until we can show everyone that we can win consistently, they all always are going to rank Redskins low.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1194351]The Packers have no business being that high[/quote]

#12 is the main reason for this, but I agree they are always hyped way too high.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[QUOTE=GridIron26;1194354]They might ranked us too low, but to be honest, I don't blame them.. The last time we had a winning record is back in 2012 with 10-6. Yes we went 9-7 in 2015 but we were one loss away from .500 that season. Until we can show everyone that we can win consistently, they all always are going to rank Redskins low.[/QUOTE]


?

9-7 by definition is a winning record

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

The only way I can think to reconcile it...

They may think there's a high chance we'll be mediocre, but a low chance that we'll be shitty and a low chance that we'll be good.

So when they make odds of us making the NFC championship they think our chance is bad, but it doesn't necessarily mean they think we'll be the 4th worst in the conference.

They might just think they have a really good idea of what we are - a seven-to-nine win team.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Schneed10;1194358]The only way I can think to reconcile it...

They may think there's a high chance we'll be mediocre, but a low chance that we'll be shitty and a low chance that we'll be good.

So when they make odds of us making the NFC championship they think our chance is bad, but it doesn't necessarily mean they think we'll be the 4th worst in the conference.

They might just think they have a really good idea of what we are - a seven-to-nine win team.[/quote]

Also, we have a truly brutal schedule.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=MTK;1194356]?

9-7 by definition is a winning record[/quote]

Don't forget about 8-7-1!

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Next time we finish 8-8 I’m counting that as a winning record since it’s only 1 win away

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

You are right about true definition of winning records if we want to get technically with definition. I just don't see it that way. 9-7 means nothing if we don't go deep into playoffs. We can go 9-7 in a row for few years without playoff wins, would we be content with that? I highly doubt that.

Granted, we are talking about winning record specifically so I suppose you guys are right about this.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1194364]You are right about true definition of winning records if we want to get technically with definition. I just don't see it that way. 9-7 means nothing if we don't go deep into playoffs. We can go 9-7 in a row for few years without playoff wins, would we be content with that? I highly doubt that.

Granted, we are talking about winning record specifically so I suppose you guys are right about this.[/quote]

If you want to say contenders then I get your definition.
As for Vegas, I think we have risen slightly above Cleveland level, but we still haven't had a playoff win since '05, so I can understand their skepticism.

I would like to think with all the changes, and all the stability, we have a good few years for certain on the horizon, but the team still has to put it all together and be consistent about it.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=FrenchSkin;1194343][URL="https://omny.fm/shows/cooley-and-kevin-with-chris-cooley-and-kevin-sheeh/05-07-18-cooley-film-breakdown-geron-christian"]Cooley's film breakdown of our 3rd round pick OT Geron Christian[/URL]

He likes him a lot, [B]loves[/B] the pick, excited about it, says he's not as raw as people say, sees him [U]100% as a starter in this league[/U]:

[B]+[/B] can play both LT and RT (in fact his college team made their tackles switch side several times during games), exceptional footwork, good pass protecter, nasty guy in the run game, super long arms, really good at re-establishing him self and moving his feet, hard to get around in the pass game, fluid, good balance

[B]-[/B] could be more immediately impactful with his first hit, never wins with his first punch, lets guys get too close to him because he's a bit late with his hands, panics a little bit sometimes against speed

Cooley finished his breakdown saying he's [U]talented enough to be a week 1 starter[/U]! (This is not what we drafted him for, but this could be turn out to be a great pick).[/quote]

I really felt like this was a great pick. They could have went and got a guard or corner but instead went BPA and got a backup LT/RT. With Trent's injuries we need a guy who can step in. I'd expect Christian to play a lot this year.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;1194365]If you want to say contenders then I get your definition.
As for Vegas, I think we have risen slightly above Cleveland level, but we still haven't had a playoff win since '05, so I can understand their skepticism.

[B]I would like to think with all the changes, and all the stability, we have a good few years for certain on the horizon, but the team still has to put it all together and be consistent about it.[/B][/quote]

You are right. I never pay attention to Las Vegas stuff so perhaps my comment was off the point.. And yes I agree with you on bold part.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Bovada just came out with the over under season win totals.

We are at 7. Their number on us last year was 7.5.

The super bowl odds are kinda a long shot bet. The over under is a much better indicator of what Vegas thinks.

I don't believe 7 is a huge slight. I think we will go over. I did last year too and was so pissed after the giants game if you know what I mean.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Yeah as really think that they should had won against the Giants. And really hate that.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

It looks like 4 compensatory draft picks in 2019.

[url]https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/redskins-likely-get-four-compensatory-picks-2019-nfl-draft[/url]

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Irrefutable;1194374]It looks like 4 compensatory draft picks in 2019.

[url]https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/redskins/redskins-likely-get-four-compensatory-picks-2019-nfl-draft[/url][/quote]



"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Robert Davis coming along.

[url]https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Bolt/Redskins-Robert-Davis-focussed-on-making-an-impact-with-the-Redskins-118076672[/url]

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=SFREDSKIN;1194377]Robert Davis coming along.

[url]https://247sports.com/nfl/washington-redskins/Bolt/Redskins-Robert-Davis-focussed-on-making-an-impact-with-the-Redskins-118076672[/url][/quote]

good to hear

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1194375]"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.[/quote]

In the 2019 draft they need. TE, QB,OL..... BPA on defense. It is nice to have 11 picks at the start, maybe they trade up if they love a player.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

We might need WR as well if Doctson doesn't do much this year

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=GridIron26;1194384]We might need WR as well if Doctson doesn't do much this year[/quote]

I agree, maybe two, if Crowder leaves.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

We also need Paul Richardson to come in and do what he got paid for, stretch the field so crowder and doctson can work underneath.

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

Doug Williams getting some love. What do you think of this quote, is this a good thing or a bad thing?

"Just like in 2017, the Redskins had an excellent draft, but they don't get a lot of credit for it because their staff doesn't lobby the national media to give them praise like other teams and general mangers."

Read more:*[url]http://walterfootball.com/draft2018awardstopnewcomer.php#ixzz5F1hwhRU3[/url]


Also, All over Twitter, they're letting Scott Campbell go, apparently Kyle Smith was given some of his responsibilities for this draft and likely is getting promoted.

With speculation about Bruce leaving soon, I could see a front office change up in which Dougie Dubs becomes GM or President or whatever and Kyle Smith becomes VP player personnel or whatever they decide to call everything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Re: Redskins Offseason Thread
 

[quote=Chico23231;1194375]"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.[/quote]

I suspect the answer is no, but what about a pick for Breeland? He was signed away from us before May 8, even though it was voided. Does the contract have to be in place as of May 8? Assume that Indy cuts Grant in August, would we still get the pick? Not sure how this works, but if anyone knows, I'd be grateful for the education.