Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=53Fan;683581]Not sure if you watched the video or not Sammy.


W-L-T as starter
2000-04 - 54-19
2005-00 - 36-26

Games missed
2000-04 - 7
2005-00 - 17

Playoff W-L
2000-04 - 7-5
2005-00 - 2-2

Pro Bowls
2000-04 - 5
2005-00 - 1

If the Eagles did not think he was on the decline and had 4-5 years left they simply would extend his contract as he asked for and trade Kolb. In the same situation this year would the Colts trade Manning if they had Kolb? I don't think so. The last couple of years McNabb has been inconsistent and they know it.[/quote]Is McNabb the 2004 version, absolutely not. Is he still a top 10 QB, absolutely. The article mentioned the Eagles are in a youth movement, Kolb is young. McNabb's numbers are strong and he's a major upgrade from Campbell. There is no statistical indication McNabb's peerformance will decline in the near term (2-3 years).

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

The only sad part is Chris Samuels had to retire.

I know he and the rest of the team caught a lot of blame for Jason Campbell's own shortcomings. How many times do we have to hear Santana Moss and Chris Cooley and Chris Samuels and Clinton Portis suck, the defense sucks because it's not like the Steelers or Ravens, and so on when we lose games 16-13.

Moss and Cooley will be able to prove they don't suck... Portis might if he isn't too broken down already...

Chris Samuels doesn't even get the chance.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

Im tired of people telling us to draft linemen

this is the NFL you don't want a rookie guard not just that the skins have been signing linemen williams is a guard!

McNabb is gonna do great and we didn't need to tell Jason about the transaction what has he really given to the franchise?

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

Still cannot believe McNabb is a Skin. This is blowing my mind ever so slightly.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

Finally, I can look forward to Madden 2011.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=Beemnseven;683312]Now that it's done, I'm 90% in favor. But the one thing that's been on my mind is pick #37 this year. [B]In the long run, wouldn't it have been better to take the two best offensive tackles in the 1st and 2nd knowing how horrific the line was last year?[/B]

[B]Doesn't matter anymore though[/B].[/quote]

That's what i was thinking word for word.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=pg86;683609][B]Im tired of people telling us to draft linemen[/B]

this is the NFL you don't want a rookie guard not just that the skins have been signing linemen williams is a guard!

McNabb is gonna do great and we didn't need to tell Jason about the transaction what has he really given to the franchise?[/quote]

So you're the jerk that Vinny was listening to? Seems to me you've been getting your way for the past . . . . ten years!

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=NYCskinfan82;683617]That's what i was thinking word for word.[/quote]

Remember when we had Chris Samuels and Jon Jansen, a first rounder and second rounder respectively, as bookend tackles?

Quarterback is the most important position, period.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=Redskins_P;683205]This is the way I see the trade....

Campbell + Zorn < McNabb + Shanahan[/quote]



Agreed

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=CRedskinsRule;683584]Ok, so about T+20 hours. I still don't like it, but reports are that the Skins/McNabb are working to get an extension. Campbell should be traded for an "acceptable" pick. So, without switching to a "Yes" I will say if the following things occur, I will feel MUCH better:

A) DM signs a 4-5 year deal for "reasonable" money, 4-5 is simply so we aren't playing around with him anymore. Should be set in a way that after year 3 he is easily cuttable.

B) JC is traded for at least a 3rd in this year's draft.

C) We win a SB[/quote]

Still mulling this whole trade over. Not a big fan - too much for an older player when we are more than one player, even a top 10 QB, from a SB.

With that said:

A) Agreed. Please, please - Can we avoid Jason Taylor redux?

B) Good luck with that. If we get a 4th I would be amazed. Everyone knows we just want to dump him.

C) Yes that would be sweet. DM throwing the winning touchdown. As an added bonus, an apoplectic Eagles fan base would implode from frustration.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=Son Of Man;683614]Finally, I can look forward to Madden 2011.[/quote]

I'm already updating my roster

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=JoeRedskin;683624]Still mulling this whole trade over. Not a big fan - too much for an older player when we are more than one player, even a top 10 QB, from a SB.

With that said:

A) Agreed. Please, please - Can we avoid Jason Taylor redux?

B) Good luck with that. If we get a 4th I would be amazed. Everyone knows we just want to dump him.

C) Yes that would be sweet. DM throwing the winning touchdown. As an added bonus, [B]an apoplectic Eagles fan base would implode from frustration[/B].[/quote]

That would make it all worth it to me.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=Trample the Elderly;683619]So you're the jerk that Vinny was listening to? Seems to me you've been getting your way for the past . . . . ten years![/quote]
No if Vinny were listening to me he would of been out to get McNabb years ago :P

I'm just saying I find it odd that our lines so horrible yet a backup qb can get behind it and not get sacked till the playoffs

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=pg86;683628]No if Vinny were listening to me he would of been out to get McNabb years ago :P

I'm just saying I find it odd that our lines so horrible yet a backup qb can get behind it and not get sacked till the playoffs[/quote]

Yeah in 2007. And that line wasn't stellar either. It's 2010. Last year's line stank.

Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
 

[quote=Trample the Elderly;683630]Yeah in 2007. And that line wasn't stellar either. It's 2010. Last year's line stank.[/quote]

We don't even know what the draft target is now though...what can we get for deep sixing J.C.?!?!? Or Colt

But really you don't wanna draft a rookie linemen