Sean Taylor going to the Pro Bowl!

U know damm well Taylor should be going over his weak ass

they only took 1 FS to the PB from the nfc and Sharper had a much better year than ST you can't argue that 1 tell me wath other SS played better than Roy Mike Brown had a better year but he played in a better defense.

In my point of view you got screwed with Washington I've said it a lot of times he's your best Def player.

The real question Mr. Sandtrap is were there any Free Safites that got in. There is a flaw in the system when you have just strong safties make it. Hey just remember those 2 TD's in September against your All Pro. Boy guess they did not consider that game.

CTR3 Correction the best 3 safeties go to the PB and at least 1 of each position it so happen that this year from the NFC 2 SS and 1FS got picked and from the AFC 2 FS and 1SS got in so man do some research before you post

NLtbE incentives i believe DO count against the cap the year after they're earned... I don't think there's any free money allowed in the cap structure.

To be a little more specific, incentives that are not LTBE(likely to be earned) do not count against the cap. Since Taylor has never made a Pro Bowl, that would be a non LTBE incentive, and not count against the cap.

Money made in incentives do count against cap as bonus money, otherwise every owner and their mother would be dishing out incentives to keep good players. I mean can you imagine ab incentive like get "1 INT" for top caliber CB?

By your logic, it also makes sense that Williams gets more tackles(horse collars, in Roy's case) than Taylor, since strong safeties generally play the run first, and the pass second, while free safeties play the pass first, and the run second. Williams does play the run very well, but he also bites on play action more than anyone in the league. He also appears to have learned pass coverage from a block of swiss cheese.

So by YOUR LOGIC, since Taylor is a FS he should have more INT's than Williams, but that is not the case either.

wait, how can ANYBODY be spouting off Roy Williams's merits here after he was so thoroughly embarassed on national TV in week2. last week wasn't so hot for him either.

it's like when you guys started spouting off about Whitten...hey you guys prolly know our TE by now right?

Dont you dallas guys see that Roy Williams is to blame for your deffense's demise? I mean ever since week 2 when we exposed him he gets burned by any team that has a speedy WR. Watch what happens this weekend when Steve Smith goes blazing by him for another TD...

Why would he put himself in that kind of situation?? Agreed he's not been convicted, but if you think he made "role model" decisions that night, we need to talk...


WWAMD?
What Would Art Monk Do?

Well, there have been times when I haven't made role model decisions. In fact, I could probably share some shocking things about my past, yet if you met me in person you'd think I was pretty cool dude.

All I am saying is, I think we use the word "thug" and "gangsta" very loosely. Especially when we really don't know the person for ourselves. I think if there's a consistent pattern of the same behaviour, then perhaps one could be called a gangsta or whatever. I'm in no way excusing or defending what appears to have happened with Sean this summer. But one incident hardly qualifies, in my mind, Sean Taylor or anyone else as a gangsta.

But then again, maybe we have two totally different definitions of a gangsta.

Bottom line, I think we both love Sean playing for our team and want him here for as long as he can stay.

I'm pretty confident he'll represent the Redskins in many Pro-Bowls and do it with class.

Well, there have been times when I haven't made role model decisions. In fact, I could probably share some shocking things about my past, yet if you met me in person you'd think I was pretty cool dude.

All I am saying is, I think we use the word "thug" and "gangsta" very loosely. Especially when we really don't know the person for ourselves. I think if there's a consistent pattern of the same behaviour, then perhaps one could be called a gangsta or whatever. I'm in no way excusing or defending what appears to have happened with Sean this summer. But one incident hardly qualifies, in my mind, Sean Taylor or anyone else as a gangsta.

But then again, maybe we have two totally different definitions of a gangsta.

Bottom line, I think we both love Sean playing for our team and want him here for as long as he can stay.

I'm pretty confident he'll represent the Redskins in many Pro-Bowls and do it with class.

Here! Here! (or is it Hear! Hear!?) - can't argue with any of that - well said numero 12. :headbange

Here! Here! (or is it Hear! Hear!?) - can't argue with any of that - well said numero 12. :headbange

My man!