PSUskinsfan11
04-23-2004, 06:03 PM
No!!!!!!!!
Taylor 2004!!!!!!!!
Taylor 2004!!!!!!!!
Report that Gibbs has talked to postons about winslowPages :
[1]
2
PSUskinsfan11 04-23-2004, 06:03 PM No!!!!!!!! Taylor 2004!!!!!!!! JudgeJebus 04-23-2004, 06:21 PM Where did you hear this? skins009 04-23-2004, 06:47 PM I heard it too, this it not good. Tonight I will pray to god that the redskins draft Sean Tayler. Big C 04-23-2004, 06:55 PM Mark Schlereth seemed to think that Winslow would force Gibbs to change his whole offensive scheme, on the Draft show today, and thinks that Gibbs wont take him. Sounds good too me...Meryl Hodge on the other hand is obscessed with Winslow and thinks he should be taken #1 overall...hehe PSUskinsfan11 04-23-2004, 07:11 PM Where did you hear this? ESPN some reporter was in Washington and he said that basically we will not trade the pick but they are going through film as old as 2 years ago between Taylor and Winslow and he said that Gibbs has even talked to the Postons about Winslow. I hope to God this is a smokescreen and they are doing this just so no one trades up to take Taylor offiss 04-23-2004, 07:27 PM Mark Schlereth seemed to think that Winslow would force Gibbs to change his whole offensive scheme, on the Draft show today, and thinks that Gibbs wont take him. Sounds good too me...Meryl Hodge on the other hand is obscessed with Winslow and thinks he should be taken #1 overall...hehe I tend to agree with sclereth on this one, gibb's as he evolved as a head coach went away from the TE, which I alway's felt was a mistake, but that's what he did, if he does take Winslow it may be an indication that he's going to utilize a lot of the old san diego system to get Winslow the ball, he know's how to do it that's not a problem, it's whether he want's to ajust his game [gibb's] to accomadate Winslow. JWsleep 04-23-2004, 08:33 PM Look, isn't it true that Gibbs offense uses the H-back a lot? Wouldn't KW II be the H-back? What would he have to change? RUn more pass plays to the H-back? Why not? What LB in the league could cover him? If the kid can block, he's a great fit. And skinsncanes tells us he can block. If they take KW II, they'll have one of the most potent offenses in the league. I like Taylor too, but this is a good pick, assuming he doesn't hold out. offiss 04-23-2004, 09:10 PM Look, isn't it true that Gibbs offense uses the H-back a lot? Wouldn't KW II be the H-back? What would he have to change? RUn more pass plays to the H-back? Why not? What LB in the league could cover him? If the kid can block, he's a great fit. And skinsncanes tells us he can block. If they take KW II, they'll have one of the most potent offenses in the league. I like Taylor too, but this is a good pick, assuming he doesn't hold out. I think it's a misconception, he seldom used the h-back or TE's for anything other than blocking, that will obviously have to change if we draft Winslow. JWsleep 04-23-2004, 09:15 PM Well, his experience with KW I in San Diego shows he can do it. Also, I remember "Touchdown" Terry Orr catching a few. And Clint Didier. But the point is that Gibbs offense uses this position in very creative ways. With a real weapon like KW II, it could be awesome. Again, I'm all for Taylor. But I think it's wrong to say that this would be a wasted pick or a terrible mistake. KW II is a real talent at a position the skins need to fill. MTK 04-23-2004, 09:36 PM Personally I think we have enough weapons on offense. But if Gibbs wants Winslow I guess I won't be too disappointed even though I prefer Taylor. In Gibbs I trust! |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum