Monk makes HOF semi-finalist list!

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4

Sheriff Gonna Getcha
11-22-2005, 08:15 PM
Until Peter King dies from eating too many burritos, Monk won't get in.

BigSKINBauer
11-22-2005, 08:52 PM
Until Peter King dies from eating too many burritos, Monk won't get in.ahhhhhhhh, ok i can wait a year

Warpath
11-22-2005, 10:14 PM
Awesome thing is, I told my wife that if Monk ever gets in, we're going. SO every year I watch closely to see if he makes the list. Has anyone even been to the Hall induction ceremony? I wonder how hard it is to get tiks and how much they cost. I also wonder if every friggin hotel for 100 miles in every direction is booked months in advance. I hope this is the year that Monk finally gets in!

BrudLee
11-22-2005, 11:29 PM
ahhhhhhhh, ok i can wait a year
:lol: :food-smil

56FAN
11-23-2005, 08:06 AM
And lets be truethful, irvin is not and i repeat not as good as monk.his personailty is all that irvin is about.mr push off.it isn't right but he just might make into the hall before monk.

onlydarksets
11-23-2005, 09:21 AM
Awesome thing is, I told my wife that if Monk ever gets in, we're going. SO every year I watch closely to see if he makes the list. Has anyone even been to the Hall induction ceremony? I wonder how hard it is to get tiks and how much they cost. I also wonder if every friggin hotel for 100 miles in every direction is booked months in advance. I hope this is the year that Monk finally gets in!

I've been a few times. I have family out there, so I don't know about hotels.

D'BOYZ
11-23-2005, 01:09 PM
"M. Irving (70%)"

Shame on a Dallas fan not even spelling Irvins name correctly!

Man I didn't notice if you read the complete post I wrote Irvin name correctly on the bottom I didn't notice I had spelled it wrong.


And I'm sorry Monk was an excellent reciever but to say he was better than IRVIN come on IRVIN change the way the wr in the league played they had to change the prototipal CB after him to a more physicall and bigger one because IRVIN just tossed them around.

He was a force on the field and a big part of a dinasty, sorry but I give any day better chances for him to get in that 2 Monk.

skinsguy
11-23-2005, 01:14 PM
Man I didn't notice if you read the complete post I wrote Irvin name correctly on the bottom I didn't notice I had spelled it wrong.


And I'm sorry Monk was an excellent reciever but to say he was better than IRVIN come on IRVIN change the way the wr in the league played they had to change the prototipal CB after him to a more physicall and bigger one because IRVIN just tossed them around.

He was a force on the field and a big part of a dinasty, sorry but I give any day better chances for him to get in that 2 Monk.

Monk was a big strong, physical receiver as well. Even though he didn't appear to be as fast as other receivers we've had on the team (Gary Clark, Santana Moss, etc...) he always found ways to get open downfield. Even when he wasn't exactly open, he still was able to haul in the pass. I am not taking anything away from Michael Irving, I thought he was a great receiver as well, but there is nothing between the two receivers that would suggest that Art Monk lacked anything from getting into the Hall of Fame before Michael Irving. In all honesty, Art Monk should have already been in the hall of fame.

D'BOYZ
11-23-2005, 01:22 PM
Monk was a big strong, physical receiver as well. Even though he didn't appear to be as fast as other receivers we've had on the team (Gary Clark, Santana Moss, etc...) he always found ways to get open downfield. Even when he wasn't exactly open, he still was able to haul in the pass. I am not taking anything away from Michael Irving, I thought he was a great receiver as well, but there is nothing between the two receivers that would suggest that Art Monk lacked anything from getting into the Hall of Fame before Michael Irving. In all honesty, Art Monk should have already been in the hall of fame.

Yes he should he was a great receiver but he hasn't got in yet and this year with all the big names I just don't see it happen and right now Irvin is the better of the 2, Monk hasn't made a top 6 candidate ever Irvin did it i nhis first year and he should had been inducted last year as harris and wright when they made the top 6 in my opinion it's dumb that the committe put players off after they reach the top six if six can get in then put six in.

For that matter I didn't think Young deserved to be there not as a first ballot for that matter.

SmootSmack
11-23-2005, 01:32 PM
Man I didn't notice if you read the complete post I wrote Irvin name correctly on the bottom I didn't notice I had spelled it wrong.


And I'm sorry Monk was an excellent reciever but to say he was better than IRVIN come on IRVIN change the way the wr in the league played they had to change the prototipal CB after him to a more physicall and bigger one because IRVIN just tossed them around.

He was a force on the field and a big part of a dinasty, sorry but I give any day better chances for him to get in that 2 Monk.

Michael Irvin was the master at the push-off. It's not so much that he was more physical than any WR before him. He just got away with pushing off a lot. And even he would admit that

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum