Raider Time

Pages : 1 [2]

#56fanatic
11-15-2005, 01:28 PM
I dont think we can look past the Raiders. They have a good bit of motivation with Norv vs "the DANNY". Norv is a great play caller and will have the first two drives scripted. They have a few weapons with Moss, Porter, and Jordan. Jordan has really started to play pretty good and the D is not as bad as it was in the beginning of the year. If we come out to soft, we are going to be in for another dogfight. We need to control the clock, like always, and somehow put pressure on Collins. Over the years he has been shakey when he gets hit early and often. If he has time, like Simms did, he will pick us apart even more. Look for a somewhat high scoring game, maybe 35 to 21, in favor of our boys

DA SKINS!!!

Big C
11-15-2005, 03:17 PM
i see us coming in with a lot of emotion after that loss, trying to redeem themselves. we win this game im almost certain, we have to. the team knows that. this is only the SECOND team this year with a LOSING record we have faced all year. damn tough scheduel

TheMalcolmConnection
11-15-2005, 03:31 PM
I'm tired of seeing our W-L column look like this:

W
L
W
L
W

Sickening stuff.

Big C
11-15-2005, 03:32 PM
soon it will look like

W
W
W
W
W
W
W

:duel: :duel: :duel:

TheMalcolmConnection
11-15-2005, 03:46 PM
I want Sunday to be the day we begin dominating teams and leaving no doubt that we belong in the playoff hunt. Have that carry over to stuffing LT and beating the Chargers.

mooby
11-15-2005, 05:23 PM
really. you know the raiders are gonna go deep against us, i have no doubt that shawn springs can shut down randy moss, but what really worries me is walt harris on jerry porter. I saw what porter did to champ bailey in that sunday night football game last year, and i have no doubt that can and probably will happen to harris. We just can't give up a big plays on defense. This is the oppurtunity for us to step up.

sportscurmudgeon
11-16-2005, 08:24 PM
Big C:

Charles Woodsen USED TO BE an excellent defensive player. For the last two seasons he has been a very highly paid AVERAGE defensive player. The Raiders will be weaker without him, but this is not the same as the Ravens losing Ed Reed. Oh, by the way, Woodsen is on a one-year franchise-player contract this year and will be "available" in the off season. The Skins do NOT need him nor should they want to try to get him. He costs waaay too much given his on-field production.

This game is a must-win for both teams. The Raiders must win if they hope to finish the season as anything more than a doormat. Once the season is a "certified loss", you can look for "fatties" like Ted Washington and Warren Sapp to chow down and get even fatter than they are now and lose any pretense they have to mobility. That could happen by December 1 if the Radiers don't win on Sunday.

The Skins need to win this weekend too because the Giants and the Cowboys look as if they will win this weekend.The Skins do not want to be 2 games down in the division with only 6 left to play.

Here's the key for the weekend. The defense has to contain LaMont Jordan - not only running the ball but catching the ball. He has more catches than Randy Moss this year! If they can do that, then they take away the "short game" and then they can tee-off and go after a highly immobile QB.

Prediction: Skins win a very close game. Margin of victory is a field goal or less.

BigSKINBauer
11-16-2005, 08:42 PM
i hereby take responsibility of the giants loss. I had no other WRs because of byes so i started plexico on my fantasy team. I will never do it again. I am going kickerless and starting my backup running back over Jordan

BigSKINBauer
11-16-2005, 08:46 PM
patten is single coveraged all the time and he fails to get open, i hope this is just some kind of slump. Moss is getting doubled and soon cooley will too so patten really needs to do his job. I am looking for Jacobs to have a good showing because we all know he can do it. 3-4 catchs 40-50 yards and i am a very happy man with jacobs

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum