redrock-skins
11-13-2005, 09:50 PM
His "schemes" have been torched for 36 points 2 out of the last 3 games and seem to give up big play after big play in all of our games.
Gregg Williams Has Some Explaining to Do!redrock-skins 11-13-2005, 09:50 PM His "schemes" have been torched for 36 points 2 out of the last 3 games and seem to give up big play after big play in all of our games. Hail2em 11-13-2005, 09:52 PM opponnets our doing their job.....watching film on us!! sniks 11-13-2005, 10:10 PM werent you guys making him the heir to joe gibbs throne in the beginning of the season?My my how quickly we turn on him. saden1 11-13-2005, 10:16 PM Why in the hell would you rush the passer continuously when you haven't even gotten to him once and you were getting toasted on the passing game is beyond me. I'm not saying play soft but, damn, can't you at least protect the sorry ass backup safeties we have? They were getting burned the whole game for god sake. NYCSkin 11-13-2005, 10:17 PM To be fair we got some banged up bodies on this D. However, I remember Buddy Ryan once saying that attacking type defenses always look better at the beginning of the season. As the season progresses--teams adjust and exploit the aggressive nature of the D. SUNRA 11-13-2005, 10:23 PM G Williams is not forcing Walt Harris to play up on the WR on 3rd down plays. Harris did the same thing against Philly and missed the tackle. Carlos Rodgers has to the starter. Playing him sporadically is not good. redrock-skins 11-13-2005, 11:47 PM werent you guys making him the heir to joe gibbs throne in the beginning of the season?My my how quickly we turn on him. The tide turned in the 2nd half of the Seattle game, when Alexander starting running all over us. We were lights out the first 2 1/2 games. Since then, our defense has only shut down the Eagles, which may have had something to do with the T.O. factor. VTSkins897 11-13-2005, 11:54 PM keep in mind that the offense handed them a TD. and of course there were some questionable calls. still the D is not looking good. i think that we really need some quality DLmen. hurrykaine 11-14-2005, 12:01 AM keep in mind that the offense handed them a TD. and of course there were some questionable calls. still the D is not looking good. i think that we really need some quality DLmen. The Defensive gameplan was a gamble today....stack the box to take away the run, and hope the rookie doesn't make the big pass plays to counter the blitz. Well, that's exactly what the 3rd year rookie did...burn us each time. Can't say it was G. Williams' fault. We were minus Griffin and Taylor, arguably two of our best defensive players. The strategy to stack the box was a good gamble to take. It's not just Harris, Rogers and Prioleau were extraordinarily average too. scowan 11-14-2005, 12:24 PM Our D has got to get to Collins next week or we may see the same thing happen. Porter and Randy Moss will kill us next week if we don't get presure on Collins. I was watching the game and everytime Simms took a snap I started counting 1 thousand one..... 1 thousand two... I got to 1 thousand 4 a lot, which means Simms had too much time... Rogers, Harris, Springs, all of our secondary guys looked bad because the front four could not get any pressure. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum