Kevikazi
10-25-2005, 06:29 PM
It just seems little odd to me that LaVar gets to start as soon as "Pro Bowl balloting" came out. Arrington is not listed as a starting OLB so you can't vote for him. Wasn't there a stipulation that L.A. had to make 2 pro-bowl to get his bonus or to become a free-agent? Maybe it's just conspiracy theorist in me....
Longtimefan
10-25-2005, 10:49 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it's like 2 pro-bowls in four years, so he has a while to go yet. If he continues to perform the way he did on Sunday then I guess sky's the limit. I too think the other players took notice of how the coaches dealt with the situation, and true enough it had the flavor of vintage Gibbs.
That Guy
10-26-2005, 06:06 PM
maybe gibbs saw a good linebacker but wasn't satisfied because he has the potential to be great... and all this posturing was a way of motivating him to try harder and become not just a huge playmaker, but also a technically and schematicly sound (like urlacher etc)...
SkinsRock
10-26-2005, 06:41 PM
I agree with most, but while this does appear to be classic Gibbs, don't forget that Williams has pretty much complete control of the defense. I see this as being more the partnership of Gibbs and Williams agreeing on how to handle Lavar, and then actually following through with it (which some coaches would not have the nerve or reputation to be able to do).
Piss him off, make him yearn to play, and make him show that he can play their way....then unleash him on the opponents and let him take his frustrations out on them!!! Sounds good to me!
5RINGS
10-26-2005, 06:46 PM
The down side of all this Arrington benching stuff, is that there is NO WAY he plays for you guys next year. Not a chance.
That Guy
10-26-2005, 06:56 PM
he will if the coaches want him to, his SB is massive (and thus his cap hit). If he shows up like he did on sunday, he'll still be here. He may be mad at the FO/staff, but publicly he's saying the right things, and he does like the fans and the town.
SkinsRock
10-26-2005, 07:22 PM
The down side of all this Arrington benching stuff, is that there is NO WAY he plays for you guys next year. Not a chance.
From what I understand, his cap hit next year is about the same whether he's here or not. I'd rather pay for a quality player to play, rather than to leave. Plus, if this year continues like it is, and we go to the playoffs or at least make a solid run with a winning record, and he plays a part in it, I'd have a hard time seeing him wanting to leave, even after all this crap. If the season ends on a good note, this situation will seem like forever ago.
Basically, it's up to the Redskins, not Lavar. I may be in the minority here, but I really think LA will still be a Redskin in 2006 and beyond.
4mrusmc
10-26-2005, 08:10 PM
The one thing that gets me though is that if he had put forth this so called effort earlier in the season, would we have lost to denver and k.c.? I wonder if he sees it like that and blames himself? Just something to think about. Beat new york!!!!!!!!
skinsguy
10-26-2005, 08:17 PM
The down side of all this Arrington benching stuff, is that there is NO WAY he plays for you guys next year. Not a chance.
That might be wishful thinking.
I think the entire LaVar situation got way overblown in the media.
By seasons end all will be forgotten.